0 votes

Sec of Defense says: Yes We Can Cause Earthquakes

http://eclipptv.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=51

"A: ... There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves."



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Government website

Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. from Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcrip...

Freedom is NOT free!

Environmental Modification Convention , Geneva 1977

* Apparently even way back in 1977 they were concerned enough about weather modification being weaponized that they felt it necessary to have this agreement.

************
As used in Article I, the term "environmental modification techniques" refers to any technique for changing -- through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes -- the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space.

Understanding Relating to Article II
It is the understanding of the Committee that the following examples are illustrative of phenomena that could be caused by the use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II of the Convention: earthquakes, tsunamis; an upset in the ecological balance of a region; changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation, cyclones of various types and tornadic storms); changes in climate patterns; changes in ocean currents; changes in the state of the ozone layer; and changes in the state of the ionosphere.

It is further understood that all the phenomena listed above, when produced by military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, would result, or could reasonably be expected to result, in widespread, long-lasting or severe destruction, damage or injury. Thus, military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II, so as to cause those phenomena as a means of destruction, damage or injury to another State Party, would be prohibited.

full agreement here:
http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/enmod/text/environ2.htm

Owning the Weather for Military Use
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO409F.html

Kay Hutchison's Weather Modification Research and Technology Act
The Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act (S.517) was introduced March 3, 2005, on the floor of the U.S. Senate by Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) without co-sponsors. The bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders on December 8, 2005. Calendar No. 319.[1]

Senator Hutchison introduced the same bill, To establish the Weather Modification Operations and Research Board and outline its duties and responsibilities (S.2170), in the 2nd Session, 108th Congress, March 4, 2004.

Weather modification forbidden
It should be noted that 'weather control', as well as 'weather tampering', is expressly forbidden dating from at least December 10 1976, when the 'United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, TIAS 9614 Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques' was adopted.[1]

"The Convention was: Signed in Geneva May 18 1977; Entered into force October 5 1978; Ratification by U.S. President December 13 1979; U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17 1980."[1]

In a December 13, 2005, letter to Senator Hutchison, John H. Marburger, III, Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President, wrote:

"The Administration respectfully requests that you defer further consideration of the bill pending the outcome of an inter-agency discussion of these issues that the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) would coordinate – with the Department of Justice on legal issues, with the Department of State on foreign policy implications, with the Departments of Defense and State on national security implications, and with pertinent research agencies to consider the reasons the U.S. Government previously halted its work in this area. At the conclusion of this review, the Administration would report back to you on the results of these discussions so you are fully apprised of all possible issues associated with authorizing a new Federal program on this topic."[1]

more...

http://www.opencongress.org/wiki/Weather_Modification_Resear...

"I think we are living in a world of lies: lies that don't even know they are lies, because they are the children and grandchildren of lies." ~ Chris Floyd

Link to the original source before the doubters start

throw in the "controlling the weather by 2025" paper too. Only use .gov or .mil websites for military information.

worth bumping--

bump

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Bookmarked!

Yes, earthquakes can be brought on by human intervention. Right now we are shakin up Texas for Medina! ;-)

Seriously..I have more to add to this topic but am too busy right now for Texas!

"I think we are living in a world of lies: lies that don't even know they are lies, because they are the children and grandchildren of lies." ~ Chris Floyd