Video! Ron Paul on Fox News - 1pm - National ID Cards
Submitted by Michael Nystrom on Wed, 03/10/2010 - 13:24
Video! Ron Paul on Fox News - 1pm - National ID Cards
Submitted by Michael Nystrom on Wed, 03/10/2010 - 13:24
|
|
||||||||
Just part of the plot...somebody get the rope...
From David (Traitor) Rockefellers Memoirs....
For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have...attack(ed) the Rockefeller famiy for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over the American political and economic institution. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalist" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global, political and economical structure--one world, if you will. "If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves." William Pitt in the House of Commons November 18, 1783
"I have one word for you...predator drones. Oh, you think I'm kidding?" Obombya
Force the proletariat
to "identify" but NOT our President. When the President proves he is eligible for the presidency, then he can begin to think about ID cards.
I hate that reporter......
when someone has a motive that is not objective, they should not be a reporter..
Dr. Paul holds his cool as usual..but seriously..this liberal idiot needs to leave the USA...and enjoy a comm/socialistic life somewhere....
JUST NOT HERE....
So you like when only one side is presented?
I'm happy that she played the devil's advocate. Fair and Balanced. I want to hear arguments from both sides. I want to see Dr. Paul's responses to objections. The reporter was just doing her job.
Support Rand Paul by donating at http://www.randpaul2010.com/ and certified non-Truthers Peter Schiff at http://schiffforsenate.com/ and John Dennis at http://www.johndennis2010.com/
you shouldn't hear ARGUMENTS
you shouldn't hear ARGUMENTS from reporters! If you want to hear both sides, bring in someone who disagrees. Its Journalism 101!
Ventura 2012
There is no "should" or "shouldn't"
It's a matter of taste. I don't want to see a reporter just get information from a politician they're interviewing. I prefer Fox's mission of "fair and balanced." Their whole thing is letting you hear both sides then leaving it so that "you decide." When they're only interviewing one person, with no second person to giving opposing views, the interviewer steps in as the devil's advocate.
Your taste is just that a reporter just gets unchallenged information from someone. Not only is that boring, but it doesn't let you see if the politicians arguments can withstand counter-arguments. Debate helps you see the reasoning behind positions.
If you don't like Fox's "fair and balanced" thing, then don't watch. Don't click on Fox videos.
Support Rand Paul by donating at http://www.randpaul2010.com/ and certified non-Truthers Peter Schiff at http://schiffforsenate.com/ and John Dennis at http://www.johndennis2010.com/
I fully agree with you
It sucks that Fox is so lame and controlled, but as informed people we can choose not to watch. It is funny that they say "fair and balanced".
Explore Orthodox Christianity
hahahahahahahha
hahahahahahahha
Ventura 2012
"I prefer Fox's mission of 'fair and balanced'. Their whole
thing is letting you hear both sides then leaving it so that 'you decide'."
Nobody believes that. Not even Rupert Murdoch.
Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!
Oh, but you would have LOVED the interview
if she agreed with everything he said. You would have thought THAT was fair and balanced wouldn't you? I call that UNbalanced. "Balance" means to hear both sides, for both sides to be given equal weight.
Support Rand Paul by donating at http://www.randpaul2010.com/ and certified non-Truthers Peter Schiff at http://schiffforsenate.com/ and John Dennis at http://www.johndennis2010.com/
I didn't mention the interview at all.
I only commented on your reply.
"I don't want to see a reporter just get information from a politician they're interviewing."
What you want is a "chat show" not a news report.
BmoreBrawler is right. Reporters/journalists are to report, nothing more. If an alternate viewpoint is required, another person is interviewed. The reporter should not be part of the debate.
Don't presume to tell me what I would have loved to have seen. That's arrogant as hell.
Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!
Fortunately you dont make the rules.
The market decides what reporters do. The market likes debate. That's why Fox is so successful.
Support Rand Paul by donating at http://www.randpaul2010.com/ and certified non-Truthers Peter Schiff at http://schiffforsenate.com/ and John Dennis at http://www.johndennis2010.com/
Jocean, read this, please.
http://granddelusion.wordpress.com/glenn-beck/
Just saw this posted at our very own DP.
This will be an eye-opener for you. Please be open.
This article has DIRECT bearing on your viewpoint. You must understand this, or you will continue in the dark.
May God bless America to continue to awaken.
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford
At the expense
of the rule of law ?
Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow
Since when is debate illegal?
?
Support Rand Paul by donating at http://www.randpaul2010.com/ and certified non-Truthers Peter Schiff at http://schiffforsenate.com/ and John Dennis at http://www.johndennis2010.com/
If by "market" you mean CFR, then I agree.
Wish I could tell Megyn, "nice to be with you!"
The "market" wouldn't know a real debate from a
monster truck rally.
Fox is successful because it flashes bright colors and uses reporters that failed the third grade.
Is that what you like?
Are you so easily dazzled by buffoonery?
If you are, I've got some cat toys I'd be happy to give you.
Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!
Fox is successful because it
Fox is successful because it flashes bright colors and uses reporters that failed the third grade.
Fox News is successful because the lamestream media has been totally suppressing coverage of right-of-Joe-Stalin political positions and Fox News spends time presenting SOME of them, thus serving a large audience.
Unfortunately, Fox News transparently presented only the neocon faction's version of the suppressed material and did its own suppression of other factions, such as the constitutionalist and libertarian versions. But they were still covering a lot more than the LSM.
I'm trying to figure out whether, since the end of the presidential primaries and the crash, they're trying to clean up their act enough to re-attract viewers from the other factions (for revenue or to head off yet another news network startup) or if they're just onboard with the neocon attempt to co-opt the liberty movement.
= = = =
"Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job."
That means: For each job "created or saved" about five were destroyed.
Trying to "co-opt the liberty movement"
is too conspiratorial for me to believe. Corporations are in it for the money. Their allegiance is only to money. Reporters will be hired and fired based on whether they cause viewership to increase or decrease. If neoconservatism is popular, they'll hire more neoconservatives. If libertarianism gets more popular they'll hire more libertarians (e.g. John Stossel). I don't doubt that if progressivism were the most popular or most interesting ideology in America, Murdoch would direct Fox to start hiring progressives and firing libertarians and conservatives. He's not going to let the stock price suffer, if he can help it.
Support Rand Paul by donating at http://www.randpaul2010.com/ and certified non-Truthers Peter Schiff at http://schiffforsenate.com/ and John Dennis at http://www.johndennis2010.com/
The opportunity cost of not
The opportunity cost of not towing the government's line overwhelms any money to be made through actually reporting of facts. The government as the primary newsmaker has distorted the market.
When the government prints the money, you don't have a free market in money. When the government makes the news, you don't have a free market in news.
Ventura 2012
The government doesn't "make the news."
There has never been so much media diversity as there is today. If one reporter distorts the facts, there is another reporter undisorting them. Competition abounds. If there is a free market in anything in this country, it is in the press.
Support Rand Paul by donating at http://www.randpaul2010.com/ and certified non-Truthers Peter Schiff at http://schiffforsenate.com/ and John Dennis at http://www.johndennis2010.com/
Please read
Jocean, you simply need to investigate more.
I challenged you to read the 2-minute article above about Beck.
Also, to truly be convinced there's an conspiracy of gov't-media-corporations (with the CFR being a major front organization, as is the UN), you can read, "The Naked Capitalist." It's a short read and will 100% convince you.
If you choose not the read this, you're much like the folks who have faith in Global Warming, where no amount of evidence will shake your faith.
But that is all you have is "belief." And that belief is founded completely in media propaganda, promulgated by the gov't and ultimately the bankers who run the world, that's right, the "capitalists" who would destroy freedom in all countries.
Since you're on this site, I would hope/trust you're open to this commonsense proposition, that there is an oligarchy that indeed rules the nations.
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford
Government DOES "make news"
Government DOES "make news" the same way that Tiger Woods "makes news".
Ventura 2012
The government produces its own news footage
and feeds it to news stations across the country without this fact being disclosed by the reporters/stations.
This has been documented many times.
http://www.prwatch.org/fakenews/execsummary
The financial, automotive, and pharmaceutical industries are intertwined with the government. There is no reason for me to believe the government isn't involved in mass media as well.
I doubt very seriously we will ever see another Woodward or Bernstein in America again.
Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!
failed the third grade?
Megyn Kelly earned her undergraduate degree in political science from Syracuse University and her J.D. from Albany Law School in 1995 [9], where she was editor of the Albany Law Review. She was an associate in the Chicago office of Bickel & Brewer, during which time she co-wrote "The Conflicting Roles of Lawyer as Director."[10] She was also an attorney who practiced as a litigator with Jones Day, in New York City, Chicago and Washington, D.C., before leaving to pursue a career in journalism. She joined Fox News in 2004.
What grade are you in?
Support Rand Paul by donating at http://www.randpaul2010.com/ and certified non-Truthers Peter Schiff at http://schiffforsenate.com/ and John Dennis at http://www.johndennis2010.com/
She's also a blonde who likes long walks on the beach and the
smell of napalm in the morning.
I guess all those degrees means she can read the little words on the "fair and balanced" teleprompter quite easily.
Good for her!
Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!
Then you should watch CNN.
Then you should watch CNN. They actually pretend to be real journalists over there(besides Rick Sanchez).
Ventura 2012
How to kill it.
Add an amendment such that:
- The ID is connected to a national database that is immediately searchible and carries the following two bits of additional information, kept up-to-date by the appropriate federal agencies:
1) Whether the person is eligible to vote in federal elections.
2) Whether the person is legally barred from purchasing a firearm.
1) Is used as follows:
- Proof of citizenship and age is required to get the bit set.
- Criminal convictions (where applicable) clears the bit, release or pardon-with-rights-restored sets it again.
- The associated ID number is needed to register to vote in federal elections.
- The ID is required to vote at a polling place in a federal election. Arranging absentee voting requires periodic checks to insure that the person voting is still alive and is the person registered.
- The national database must be used (and updated) by the registrars of voters of the states, counties, and municipalities to insure that each voter is registered in, and votes in, no more than one place and one time for any federal election.
- (Usual hook: Withholding any election-related federal funding.)
2) is used as follows:
- Firearms dealers may interrogate the database to determine if the person in question is eligible to purchase the firearm.
- A positive response serves as an "instant background check", allowing the immediate (no waiting period) sale of firearms to the bearer and immunizing the dealer against any prosecution for allegedly selling to an unqualified individual.
- The dealer may not be required to inform the database on whether, how many, or what type of firearms were purchased. The operators of the database may not keep records of which IDs were checked or when and where. (Keeping such records subjects the operators of the database and the responsible agency to suits for statutory damages for denial of civil rights under color of law - so enforcement can be done by citizens without cooperation from prosecutors.)
The idea here is not to get this passed, but to make passing it so repugnant to certain politicians that they'll vote against it. These two amendments, if attached, should get the Democrats solidly onto the "no" side. 1) would spike the ACORN and motor-voter plus permanent-absentee vote fraud and many other ballot-box-stuffing schemes (from which they benefit selectively) and 2) will get their anti-gun faction "up in arms". B-) ) On the R side they're unlikely to draw votes from anybody who wouldn't have voted for a national ID card anyhow.)
= = = =
"Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job."
That means: For each job "created or saved" about five were destroyed.
The govenment belongs to the people...
We should be tagging the government like cattle. Not the people.
KevTuma: Here's your next idea for a Comic
Lego: That was a funny visual man, hahahahaha!!
"Cattle Branding Congress" -- Gov't Branded by the People, smile.
*&^ Constitution --- Constitutional Rationality