Ron Paul "Once You Allow A Secret Bank To Create Money Out Of Thin Air You Allow Wars!"
Submitted by BFrank on Wed, 03/17/2010 - 08:09
in
| |
  
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
I agree, you cannot have a
I agree, you cannot have a just society if the money is fraudulent.
Everything will be corrupted.
----------------------------------------------
tiffany jewellery
Financial reform "watered down to win Republican votes"??
What a joke! The first sentence out of Ed's mouth makes no sense. Doesn't he know that the Dems have more than enough votes in the House and the Senate to pass whatever financial reform they want? If it's been watered down, it obviously was done so by The Dems, who can easily get the media to blame the other side.
WHO GOT BIG MONEY FROM WALL STREET IN THE LAST ELECTION, BY A FACTOR OF FOUR TO ONE!!
WHO HAS THE MOST TIES TO THE BIGGEST FINANCIAL FIRMS??
GE, GM, CHRYSLER, AIG, GOLDMAN SACHS, COUNTRYWIDE, and with Obamacare: BIG PHARMA, BIG HEALTH INSURANCE, ...
WHO HAS RUN FANNIE AND FREDDIE 95% OF THE TIME, PROFITED IMMENSELY, AND RAN IT INTO THE GROUND (only to resuscitate it again) BY REFUSING TO REGULATE IT?
Put on the thinking cap. Who has the incentive to water down a financial reform bill - especially when they have all the votes? Republicans get a far larger percentage of their campaign donations from small individual contributions. Dems rely on BIG donors.
If one hasn't figured out that the Democratic party is the party of Big Business, then one is not paying attention to the facts - only impressions created by the media and conspiracy theorists.
Sorry - a distraction from the Ron Paul segment. Ron made a lot of sense.
It's called fiat usury.
The government is in the business of fiat usury. It borrows and feeds those who live off of the interest collected. There are two ways that I can think of to escape the debt. If people begin to remove their savings and spend on good and services or if the government prints. Where we are trapped is if the Fed raises interest rates. If interest rates remain at zero and fiat money circulates then eventually the debt can be paid off.
If the government had this same debt in gold there would be no way of paying off the debt except to mine more gold, the reason for this is because when bankers and investors don't spend, they lend. That's the trap.
grant
Aristotle (384-322 BC) formulated the classical view against usury.
Aristotle understood that money is sterile; it doesn't beget more money the way cows beget more cows. He knew that "Money exists not by nature but by law":
"The most hated sort (of wealth getting) and with the greatest reason, is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself and not from the natural object of it. For money was intended to be used in exhange but not to increase at interest. And this term interest (tokos), whichmeans the birth of money from money is applied to the breeding of money because the offspring resembles the parent.
Ron Paul is the only politician
that ever makes the connection between economic policy and defense/offense policy.
He's also the only one (to my knowledge) that has actually called Keynesianism pernicious (because, according to Keynes, it doesn't matter if you spend money on public works or a war, it'll have the same economic stimulant effect). Which, if you think about it, basically means it's OK to kill people to create jobs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics
http://mises.org
splitting hairs here, but Ron
splitting hairs here, but Ron Paul is not a politician..
he is a statesman.
“Defiance of God’s Law will eventually bring havoc to a society.” - Dr. Ron Paul
good exchange.
good exchange.
He's cuts right through the
He's cuts right through the BS as with a scalpel
Another excellent interview.
How can anyone consider somebody other than Dr. Paul qualified to be President?
While I agree with you 100% on that
How long do you think he would last in office, assuming he could even make it that far?
And how long did JFK last against the money power?
=======
RON PAUL 2012
the only other 2 I would
the only other 2 I would consider is Judge Napolitano or Chuck Baldwin.
“Defiance of God’s Law will eventually bring havoc to a society.” - Dr. Ron Paul
Big Time Regulator
Paul is the Regulator of The Constitution & The Rule of Law
The most important issue of our time,
and 301 views on You Tube. That is heartbreaking.
Probably a few hundred thousand watched it though
These things take time.
Explore Orthodox Christianity
what a brilliant man,
what a brilliant man, explains everything so clearly. thank god for Ron Paul.
". . . the moral hazard of creating money."
The lender of last resort is a super preditor beast.
And never forget, “Humans, despite our artistic pretensions, our sophistication and many accomplishments, owe the fact of our existence to a six-inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains.”
Every Time
Every time Ron Paul speaks, I'm amazed. Let's hope he can stick around for many more years.
re:Ron Paul "Once You Allow A Secret Bank To Create Money Out Of
quete:"Ron Paul "Once You Allow A Secret Bank To Create Money Out Of Thin Air You Allow Wars!""
the social here is always did this as a better one and what we can do is to watching....
Ron Paul did better ,a words can't do more effected to ...
......
tiffany jewellery
Good interview
Dr. Paul hits some key points. I really enjoyed his point that wars happen partly because the money incentive is there.
END the FED before it ENDS US
central banks are evil.
I think this is the most important thing I have learned from the good Dr.
they are "special" banks that only governments get to have.....they are not like your bank and mine.
END THE FED!!!!!!
Knowledge is power, action is love.
National Bank = National Corruption
Trade is the heart of society.
I agree, you cannot have a just society if the money is fraudulent.
Everything will be corrupted.
Not just End the Fed, but follow the law. Only gold and silver shall be legal tender.
By following the law, it prevents fiat currency and fractional reserve banking since they can only exist on paper.
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
.
Nothing new but it's always good to see the good doctor get some sheep time.
RON PAUL PHONE FROM HOME
R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 2012!
Mises.org
Fed. Res. started 1913; WWI started 1914
the data checks out.
LibertyDefined.org | If | Not Perfect
Yes, these criminal bankers
figured instead of competing with one another, they devised a way to create a monopoly where only they control everything hence the Federal Reserve in 1913. But they didn't just end it there, as soon as the Fed was signed in their machinations in Europe created the outbreak of war based upon an assassination of Franz Joseph as a pretext for WWI. Right after the new year 1914 there were strong voices making big noises against this abomination but too late the War was declared and soon everyone cared only for their loved ones having to be soldiers.
Later that year the sixteen amendment was passed without 2/3rds ratification of the States. They rammed it through and acted 'as if' it was ratified. They began setting up their mafia - parasite grew into the gigantic leviathan that sucks the life force out of each of us to this very day.
These bankers treat our collective energies as if it were a Bonsai tree.
What blows my mind is...
if the 16th Amendment never was ratified, then how did it become law?
In fact, it really isn't law, is it?
But we act like it is.
What is the history? Weren't there any honest politicians back then who said, "it wasn't ratified, so it's not law." Why is it enforced?
This blows my mind.
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford
1913 was a very strange year in the USA
Remember that eugenics was in full swing and dissenters were killed without question. As a 3rd or 4th generation slave, it's harder to recognize that our entire lives have been lived in captivity. Folks back then knew the deal and either accepted it or died or got sterilized.
Explore Orthodox Christianity
bump
for truth
Freedom is NOT free!