Does Federal law superceed State law?

Does federal law supersede state law? The answer is, only in areas specifically mentioned in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. This is made very clear by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments of the Bill of Rights.

The states can't declare war. The states can't exchange ambassadors with foreign nations. The states can't issue passports. The states can't operate customs and impose tariffs.

At the same time, the federal government has no authority to control our health care, but that doesn't stop the criminals in Washington, DC. They also have no authority to control our education, or energy production. They have no authority to ensure the safety of airline passengers - that is the responsibility of the airlines.

So, federal law only supersedes state law in the areas where the federal government is given authority. All public servants, federal, state, county and local take an oath to support and defend the Constitution. We need to make sure they abide by that oath.

Only constitutional laws from the Federal government supersede State laws.

The healthcare bill is definitely not constitutional, so it does not qualify as superseding State law, even if passed.

Just as Thomas Jefferson said in 1799, "Whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force."

The lawsuit is not entirely useless, it will help the attorney general to look like a "people's man" in his future political bid, when in reality he will still be the establishment whore.

This useless lawsuit will give him the image of the guy who fought against the system, so he can talk about being "different" then the others politicians. I can already see him saying "I quit my job as an attorney general and decided to become a Senator to better serve the people.I will go and change Washington, bla,bla,bla".

As agreed to within the forwarded Constitutional limits..Other than this the States jurisdiction supersedes all jurisdictions..
Corporate USA does not have any legal jurisdiction at all if you want to get down to brass tacks ..The States never agreed to a Corporation takeover.
The States meerly need not to recognize the False jurisdiction..
Civil law versus; Corporate law not agreed upon by the States.

BUT good luck enforcing States Rights at this moment in history...States need a big arsonal..I guess the States could legally cut all financial cash flow to the FED gov't, by Continental Congress vote...That's a big gun.

Executive orders may not bypass or supersede the limitations of the Reserved States Rights & States jurisdiction..It's all about jurisdiction..Who's jurisdiction is it..In my opinion , I'm not sure that the amendments made to the Constitution are legal on the premis that the FED gov't does not have the right granted to them to change the Constitution.
It would need to be changed within the framework of a Continental Congrees to ratify changes by vote outside of the Federal gov't..The States in majority vote are the writers of the Constitution not the FEDeral gov't..

SO where are ALL these great Harvard graduates..They should have been taught all this ..Where are the men of renown who are not politicians????????????

CONSTITUTIONAL Federal law and court decisions do, but not un-CONSTITUTIONAL ones.