3 votes

U.S. creates violent jihadist textbooks for use in afganistan

These textbooks cause extremists. Maybe that was what the goal was. Hmmm?

The Jihad Schoolbook Scandal...

Why has the US been Shipping Muslim Extremist Schoolbooks into Afghanistan...for 20 Years?

And why is President Bush hiding it?

By Jared Israel
[Posted 9 April 2002]

=======================================

Have you heard about the Afghan Jihad schoolbook scandal?

Or perhaps I should say, "Have you heard about the Afghan Jihad schoolbook scandal that's waiting to happen?"

Because it has been almost unreported in the Western media that the US government shipped, and continues to ship, millions of Islamist textbooks into Afghanistan. (Islamist

Only one English-speaking newspaper we could find has investigated this issue: the Washington Post. The story appeared March 23rd. (1)

Washington Post investigators report that during the past twenty years the US has spent millions of dollars producing fanatical schoolbooks, which were then distributed in Afghanistan.

"The primers, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then [i.e., since the violent destruction of the Afghan secular government in the early 1990s] as the Afghan school system's core curriculum. Even the Taliban used the American-produced books..." -- Washington Post, 23 March 2002 (1)

According to the Post the U.S. is now "...wrestling with the unintended consequences of its successful strategy of stirring Islamic fervor to fight communism."

So the books made up the core curriculum in Afghan schools. And what were the unintended consequences? The Post reports that according to unnamed officials the schoolbooks "steeped a generation in [Islamist] violence."

How could this result have been unintended? Did they expect that giving fundamentalist schoolbooks to schoolchildren would make them moderate Muslims?

=============

Let's be reasonable

=============

Nobody with normal intelligence could expect to distribute millions of violent Islamist schoolbooks without influencing school children towards violent Islamism. Therefore one would assume that the unnamed US officials who, we are told, are distressed at these "unintended consequences" must previously have been unaware of the Islamist content of the schoolbooks.

But surely someone was aware. The US government can't write, edit, print and ship millions of violent, Muslim fundamentalist primers into Afghanistan without high officials in the US government approving those primers.

So if the books weren't supposed to be Islamist, that is if their fanatical content contradicted US policy in Afghanistan, shouldn't the mass media and top politicians, such as President George Bush, now be calling for an investigation? Shouldn't they be demanding to know the identity of the official or officials who subverted the intended US policy by flooding Afghanistan with jihad primers?

Indeed, considering the disastrous consequences, shouldn't US officials and the media be questioning the very practice of violating the sovereignty of other countries by distributing millions of Islamic fundamentalist schoolbooks?

Yet using the media search engine, Lexis-Nexis, we could find no evidence that any mainstream Western newspaper, other than the Washington Post, nor any TV station or government leader ever questioned, let alone denounced, the export of millions of Islamist schoolbooks to Afghanistan.

Quite the contrary.

For example here's what the Boston Globe wrote in an article about the obstacles to education in Afghanistan, a year after the US invasion:

"The obstacles to accomplishing that goal are enormous. What few schools impoverished Afghanistan once had - about 2,000 - are now all virtually destroyed, pummeled by gunfire or turned into refugee camps. Teachers here have not been paid for months, even years. Those schoolbooks that still exist are pro-Taliban screeds and deemed unusable.
-- Elizabeth Neuffer in the Boston Globe, March 17, 2002 (1A)

The article implies that the unusable textbooks were produced by and for the Taliban - "pro-Taliban screeds." The author, Elizabeth Neuffer, is the Globe's UN Bureau Chief. Surely she must know that the textbooks in question were made in USA and that the US is continuing to ship Islamist textbooks into Afghanistan. Instead of exposing the scandal that the US promotes Muslim fanaticism in Afghanistan, she misrepresents the books and misleads her readers.

Other newspapers spun more elaborate lies. Here is the Daily Telegraph from Sydney, Australia:

[Daily Telegraph Excerpt starts here]

"AFGHAN children ran, skipped and dawdled to their classrooms like pupils everywhere yesterday for the start of a new school year -- with girls and women teachers back in class and subjects like math replacing the Islamic dogma of the Taliban.

"In a symbolic break from a war-scarred past, children opened new textbooks written by Afghan scholars based at universities in the US.

"There are even pictures of people -- images banned by the fundamentalist Taliban."
- The Daily Telegraph (Sydney), March 25, 2002 (1B)

[Daily Telegraph Excerpt ends here]

By beginning the article with the irrelevant but cheery image - "Afghan children ran, skipped and dawdled...[etc]." - the Telegraph prepares us for an upbeat news experience. We are not disappointed. We are told that in the new textbooks:

"There are even pictures of people -- images banned by the fundamentalist Taliban."

Again we get the impression that the Taliban were responsible for the bad old texts but due to the US invasion "children opened new textbooks...".

Unfortunately, as the Washington Post investigators reported:

"Even the Taliban used the American-produced books, though the radical movement scratched out human faces in keeping with its strict fundamentalist code." -- Washington Post, March 23, 2002

Other than their objections to the human face, the Taliban were perfectly happy with the US-produced primers.

As if presenting evidence of a sea change, the Telegraph tells that now Afghan children have schoolbooks "written by Afghan scholars based at universities in the US."

The rest of the article appears at http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm . excellent website expecially for anyone that wants to understand the Vatican/nato war against the serbs.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

should be read

bump for importance

hate to comment on my post

hate to comment on my post but the emperorsclothes.com site was attacked recently. They say this Dear Readers,

In the past few days, TENC was attacked. Someone deleted a great many - perhaps hundreds - of files from our server, including everything written in Serbo-Croatian; much of our material in English on Yugoslavia (the page with our main collection of Yugoslavia articles is back online, but some articles may not yet be when you read this); all our articles rebutting the charge of genocide at Srebrenica; much of our material dealing with the Vatican (the Vatican page is back up, but not yet all articles); and most articles on Marko Perkovic Thompson, the clerical-fascist Croatian rock star. (What a remarkable combination: "clerical-fascist" and "rock star." Too bad it's true.)

do a search on that site for hitlers map and you might find how hitler intended to carve up the countries and the various ethnic groups. Whats shocking is that is exactly what the u.s. e.u. nato and the vatican have done in our time. hitlers goal was an e.u. That area is critical to controling europe. The serbs kept japan from fighting against the allies in europe by fighting against the triparte treaty. Japan refused to join the two front war until the serbs were dealt with. The international community (spit) is commiting genocide against the serbs for the e.u...(spit)

"We must re-take the Republican Party"-Ron Paul. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlqXq8YxQFQ

I've had time to read this and . . .

none of my typical words will work--

Has anyone else on here known about this?

Where was this information 8 years ago?

I was against the war from the beginning, so why didn't *I* see this?

*shaking my head in dismay, astonishment and horror*

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

DailyPaul is a DailyDose

of unimaginable news stories. You could not make up or even dream up the stuff that is uncovered here. This textbook story makes total sense regarding our interference inside other countries and the "blowback" result. I can't wait for tomorrow's revelation.

US Intentionally Orchestrates "Blowback"

I still contend that the 'supposed feigned ignorance' on the theory of "blowback" by most of our military leaders, intelligence and government officials is pure BS!! They understand the theory very well IMO and they count on and sometimes orchestrate it ...in order to continue justification for the ongoing occupations

"I think we are living in a world of lies: lies that don't even know they are lies, because they are the children and grandchildren of lies." ~ Chris Floyd

I agree

they need an enemy.

Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.

bumping to . . .

look into this when I have more time.

I may have to use one of my three well-used words: chilling, disturbing, scary--

for this--

:(

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--