Abolish the Fed documentary

Hello Paul, I took the time to read your article. Good work, well done!

It is unfortunate that our leaders at every level have either been accomplices or ignorant of the damages done to all free people by the Federal Reserve Bankers and the world’s central bankers who control the national wealth of all the countries where they control the creation of money.

We were warned by our Founding Fathers exactly what to expect if the control of our money system was relinquished to the central bankers. The battle over money control was going on long before the FRB was given this monopoly and the sanctions of government force to implement their long term goals. Our Founders believed that the American people would not be conquered by war but by destroying our wealth from within.

The goal of the central bankers and all those elitist who support them is simple; the complete and utter surrender of individual freedom and liberty to the aristocracy of the ruling class. The destruction of our wealth is not accidental but the planned slavery of the individual to the “state”.

Out of ignorance or intent, our academic leaders lie to our youth; many religious leaders lie to the religious, and our government leaders lie to everyone. The elitist of every stripe support the FRB and its goals.

You are so right; this is not a simple case of misguided intentions. The central bankers are counterfeiters, inflators and traitors to the American people and should be punished accordingly.

I watched the Democrat debate for a short time this past Sunday morning (that’s all I could take). I heard the words “constitution” or “getting back to our constitutional roots” no less than 3 times. Are the neo-liberal Democrats (really just neo-cons in liberal clothing) changing their views or are they just mouthing the words and sentiments they hear from Dr. Paul because of the strong support he is getting from the people. They will lie through their teeth to keep themselves in control. Don’t fall for more lies. They are not changing their goals only their rhetoric to win.

Best Regards,
Anti-Stupid

Did you know that Paul did not teach the Ten Commandments to the gentiles in Asia Minor? And you might also realize that the Ten Commandments were given to Israel strictly to keep them from being destroyed about the Golden Calf imagery?

Paul taught the Seven Noachide Laws.

_________________________

"Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

"Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;"
_________________________

Ron Paul was not on the roll call then, but the Sanhedrin took things very seriously:

_________________________

"This Court, therefore, urges the Attorney General of the United States of America, Janet Reno, currently under the Political Leadership of President Bill Clinton to answer to the charge of failure to hear a grievance that is brought before its duly appointed Courts, and it has 90 working days in which to show cause as to why this case should not be heard before this Court and to submit documents showing that it has conformed with all treaties, conventions and wishes of the native peoples and with states accepted or annexed under the Constitutional principles and Noahide law, which was adopted as Law in the United States by Congress."
_________________________

So remember how these two verses are talking about the same laws:

_________________________

Gen 9:4 But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.

and

Act 15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
_________________________

Regards,

David Merrill.

P.S. I know what you mean; The Public Papers of FDR are above and the thick green book is the Constitution:

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/attachments/end-days-america/3...

LakeshoreBaby,

As a law student let me shed some light on this subject.

Federal acts (i.e. Acts of Congress) are merely statutes enacted by the United States Government (i.e. legislation) that are binding as law in all jurisdictions, provided they are not unconstitutional.

There are several sources of law in the United States, such as constitutional law, administrative law, statutes, and the common law (case law). There is also a hierarchy of law (which helps us decide what law trumps another). For example, the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land and may invalidate any other law, whether administrative, statutory or case law by declaring it unconstitutional.

To determine whether specific laws apply to a particular case, you must determine whether it is "mandatory authority" or merely "persuasive authority" (such as court dicta, non-jurisdictional court decisions, etc.). Generally speaking, federal laws (whether constitutional, statutory, or administrative) are always mandatory in every court (both federal and state). And U.S. Supreme Court cases that interpret federal law is mandatory on all courts (if only a state law is at issue, the state's supreme court has the final say, not the U.S. Supreme Court). Other federal courts' holdings (e.g. those from federal district courts or federal courts of appeal) that interpret federal law are mandatory only for lower courts in the same jurisdiction.

A state's constitution, statutes, and administrative law are always mandatory within that state (and only in that state). A state’s common law (case law) is mandatory for lower courts in the same jurisdiction and for federal courts interpreting state law. It is persuasive for all other courts.

As for the United States Code, it is the codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States. It is divided by broad subjects into 50 titles. These are mandatory authority in all cases. Contrary to what David said (and with all due respect to David), every provision in the US Code is mandatory authority, none of which is "voluntarily assumed." Subjection to Title 26 of the US Code (Internal Revenue Code) is hardly voluntarily assumed. If you earn income in excess of allowable deductions, you must pay income taxes (subject to the Title's provisions).

To answer your final question, yes, Executive Orders by the President have the force of law, provided they do not violate federal constitutional or statutory law. Well, most have the force of law anyways; Proclamations are generally ceremonial or symbolic.

Hope this helps,

kpage3

Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.