Washington Post: So who wants to join Rand Paul's "tea-party" caucus?
Republican lawmakers gird for rowdy tea party
By Shailagh Murray
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, July 18, 2010; A03
So who wants to join Rand Paul's "tea-party" caucus?
"I don't know about that," Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) replied with a nervous laugh. "I'm not sure I should be participating in this story."
Republican lawmakers see plenty of good in the tea party, but they also see reasons to worry. The movement, which has ignited passion among conservative voters and pushed big government to the forefront of the 2010 election debate, has also stirred quite a bit of controversy. Voters who don't want to privatize Social Security or withdraw from the United Nations could begin to see the tea party and the Republican Party as one and the same.
Paul, the GOP Senate nominee in Kentucky, floated the idea of forming an official caucus for tea-party-minded senators in an interview in the National Review as one way he would shake up Washington. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), one of the movement's favorite incumbents, filed paperwork on Thursday to register a similar group in the House "to promote Americans' call for fiscal responsibility, adherence to the Constitution, and limited government."
In six states -- Kentucky, Nevada, Florida, Utah, Colorado and Minnesota -- tea-party-backed Republican Senate candidates have won nomination or are favored in upcoming primaries. They are attracting outsize attention not only from Democrats and the media, but from conservative leaders such as former Alaska governor Sarah Palin and Fox News host Glenn Beck.
Republicans such as Paul and Sharron Angle in Nevada may hold provocative views, but "they're our nominees and I think we ought to get behind them 100 percent," said Sen. John Cornyn (Tex.).
"The candidates are not ours to choose," said Cornyn, chairman of the Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee. "They're the choice of the primary voters in the states, and I think we should respect their choices."
Yet some Republicans worry that tea-party candidates are settling too comfortably into their roles as unruly insurgents and could prove hard to manage if they get elected. Paul, who beat GOP establishment favorite Trey Grayson in Kentucky's primary, told the National Review that he would seek to join forces with GOP Sens. Jim DeMint (S.C.) and Tom Coburn (Okla.), "who are unafraid to stand up" and who have blocked numerous bills advanced by both parties deemed by the pair as expanding government.
"If we get another loud voice in there, like Mike Lee from Utah or Sharron Angle from Nevada, there will be a new nucleus" to advocate causes such as term limits, a balanced-budget amendment and "having bills point to where they are enumerated in the Constitution," Paul said in the interview.
Former Senate majority leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), now a D.C. lobbyist, warned that a robust bloc of rabble-rousers spells further Senate dysfunction. "We don't need a lot of Jim DeMint disciples," Lott said in an interview. "As soon as they get here, we need to co-opt them."
But Lott said he's not expecting a tea-party sweep. "I still have faith in the visceral judgment of the American people," he said.
Sen. Robert F. Bennett (R-Utah), who failed to survive his party's nominating process after running afoul of local tea-party activists, told a local Associated Press reporter last week that the GOP had jeopardized its chance to win Senate seats in Republican-leaning states such as Nevada and Kentucky and potentially in Colorado, where tea-party favorite Ken Buck has surged ahead of Lt. Gov. Jane Norton in their primary battle.
Bennett warned that such candidates are stealing attention from top GOP recruits such as Mike Castle in Delaware and John Hoeven in North Dakota, both of whom are favored to win seats held by Democrats. Nor are they helping the Republican Party to resolve its deeper identity problems, he said.
"That's my concern, that at the moment there is not a cohesive Republican strategy of this is what we're going to do," Bennett told the AP. "And certainly among the tea-party types there's clearly no strategy of this is what we're going to do."
more
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07...




















Corker is trash
and needs to be kicked to the curb when his election comes up.
Lott is a long-time traitor who needs to go out to pasture because he's irrelevant.
These usurper Neocons aren't going to like getting kicked-out. They think they have it pretty cozy, and they like it that way. They aren't going to play very nice with us.
So, they just need to be kicked out of the way. Their time is over, and they held sway in this Party too long already.
Just remember what they did to RP during the 2008 primary cycle, if any extra motivation is needed. They are snakes.
And notice what the media always does?
They give airtime to irrelevant people like Lott and Palin and other has-beens or never-wases, in an effort to keep them "relevant", or infer that anything they say has some kind of relevancy.
This is a blatant indicator of media bias in keeping the "status quo". They often tip their hand, if anybody pays the least bit of attention to how they operate.
bump
for discussion. How does a honest candidate survive and do the right thing even if they get elected? We must continue to pressure those who are elected and vote against the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.
Does He Mean to Sound Condescending and Insulting?
But Lott said he's not expecting a tea-party sweep. "I still have faith in the visceral judgment of the American people," he said.
1. Lott is saying that if we vote for tea party candidates, we have bad judgement.
2. The American People are not believers in freedom (the tea party's core issue).
If he can't trust our judgement, that would be an excellent reason for him to join the tea party movement, since libertarianism is based on the idea of the freedom to trust oneself without needing permission from others.
IMissLiberty
What if none of the tea party candidates are elected?
So far establishment Republican leaders have said they will support the tea party nominees but maybe that's just for show. Behind the scenes their bosses, the real power brokers of the New World Order, have to be marshaling their forces against the tea party candidates who threaten their big global control plans. A Democrat to them would be far preferable.
New Hampshire and Ecuador
Good point!
!
A republican identity problem ?
I'd say so, it's impossible to differentiate between a democrat and a republican. They work both sides headed toward the middle, it's called herding and it's used to round up the cattle or the sheep. What you use as a guide for what you do in Federal government is the Constitution. If it says do this, then do that, if it says this is off limits you can't do that. Seems pretty simple and it has nothing to do with party. Parties are the WWF wrestling some people watch late on Saturday nights. It's a bullcrap game of divisiveness meant to divide and conquer. I believe the people in the Tex Parties realize this now and they're saying enough is enough.
Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow
I wonder how they'd "co-opt" Rand Paul.
Sounds like Lott has a definite process in mind. Maybe they say "OK, what are your favorite committee assignments and which are your least favorite? Tell you what, I'll give you your choice of committees but on the condition that you vote with me. If you can't give me your word on that, I'll have to put you on the suckiest committees and you'll have to share an office with the janitor."
Maybe the tea party caucus likelies should demand the worst assignments of committee and office as a united front against co-option.
New Hampshire and Ecuador
Hell with it. There are NO
Hell with it. There are NO "sucky" committees up there if even one has anything to do with knowledge or the system changing. Their personal power is not why we are trying so hard to send them there, and they know that. As RP basically said, it takes a strong person to resist the urges to run our lives. They stay strong or we vote them out. One of the Tea Party missions is to watch the officials they elect and every vote they take needs to be explained, and transparent.
Of course, which is why
Of course, which is why DeMint toppling McConnell as minority leader would be very important.
The first 5 million supporters of Dr. Paul are 'early adopters.' The next 10 million will require a modified approach.
good points
good points
Follow me on Twitter for breaking news on Ron Paul and the U.S. Economy:
www.twitter.com/AbolishTheFed