CNN outed CFR president is Huckabee advisor on Foreign Policy!!!

Anyone who has anything to do with the CFR is a traitor to this Nation and to Liberty. Anyone.

I sent Hagee ministries an email last night, but had not confirmed this information yet. This over the top. This is not just about certain policy ideas vs. another. This is complete abandonment of the people of the USA. Mike Huckabee is a traitor. He has sold his soul. Now we know what happened back in September - he licked the boot of the NWO!!

I do find it interesting that the interest in Huck and his sudden rise in media attention and the polls happened immediately after he addressed the Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR controls the corporate media and are doing their best to prop Huckabee up. First they anointed Rudy, but conservatives cannot stand him since he is corrupt and way to the left of most Republicans. Then it was Romney, but his religion is a problem with evengelists, not to mention his flip-flopping on so many core issues. John McCain, another CFR member, had already alienated the base with his attacks on the administration for the past six years, and his open borders amnesty stance, though a winner with his CFR masters, destroyed his chances. Then they got Fred Thompson out there, but the man has been something of a dud. So now it's Huck's turn.

More and more people are figuring out that the two political parties are virtually identical. The CFR controls both presidential candidates in every single election. They control Hillary, Obama, and Edwards, and no other Democrat has a chance. However, Ron Paul has to be giving them fits. A Paul presidency would undo half a century of CFR meddling.

Fortunately, there are plenty of people on the right who, though they would immediately make fun of any of us for mentioning the CFR and its power, they are not part of it either. In the last couple of days, there have been huge hit pieces against Huckabee by George Will and Ann Coulter. Michelle Malkin is blogging against him, and Rush Limbaugh, who calls him "the Huckster", practically had an anti-Huckabee meltdown yesterday.

Much of "the right" might not get Ron Paul, but agree with us on most issues. A lot of them love Bush for the war on terror but hate everything else about his administration. That's where I was a few years ago. They revolted over Harriet Miers, Dubai Ports, and amnesty for illegal aliens. They won't just roll over for a bad candidate because the corporate media tell them to.

Does anyone know or how we can find out when this Richard Haas President of the CFR started to be advisor to Mike Huckabee? If we can find out and then look into when Mike Huckabee started to go up in the polls like they say he is, then we can see this is all a FARSE!

They will have to pry the GOP from the dead, cold hands of most of the neocons. They will not go away quickly and the Democrats will be a lot less welcoming to them, Hillary, Obama, Biden etc notwithstanding. A lot of Democrats don't want these troublemakers. Rahm Emanuel is one CFR type, pushing pro-war Dems in the last election; he's hated by a lot of anti-war Dems.

They will only abandon the Republican party when they think it can't win anymore. And that will be soon if it doesn't accept Ron Paul.

Thanks for bringing this up!

I found this tidbit on one of Time's blogs:

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2007/12/wingtips_vs_boots...

Mike Huckabee, famously, has near-zilch foreign policy experience, but his gut reactions in a forthcoming piece in Foreign Affairs are refreshingly independent of the lockstep militarism deployed by the other Republicans running for President. This may be a consequence of conversations Huckabee's been having recently with Richard Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, which publishes Foreign Affairs.

Haass is a moderate Republican middle east expert--Iran is his specialty--who left the Bush State Department, in large part because he opposed the war in Iraq.

Open and shut case... Mr. Huckabee has been anointed!

sorry what does CFR stand for?/

Link? Something? This is explosive if it can be confirmed and substantiated but totaly useless and dangerous if it cannot be.