Updated: 8-21-10 C-to-C AM:911 Debate
Submitted by SteveMT on Sat, 08/21/2010 - 13:21
The program aired 8-21-10. For those interested in this conspiracy theory, this program should have been a very interesting one, but was not. See comments below.
Richard Gage from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and Dave Thomas, a physicist from New Mexicans for Science and Reason will debate the idea of controlled demolition of buildings on 9/11. Kim Johnson and Niels Harrit also join the discussion. Hosted by Ian Punnett.
Overall disappointing
The format was very awkward. I fell asleep and never did hear any plausible rebuttal of the "Pile-Driver Effect", given as reason for the towers to collapse by Thomas. I thought the host did a poor job.
Vote for Liberty...Buy Silver Eagles.
I listened for two hours last night,..
and must say that I was overall disappointed. Ian Punnett should have had a focused agenda on the points he knew that there was disagreement about, and he should have tried to get to the truth.
1. What temperature does bare steel melt at?
2. What temperature does kerosene burn at?
3. Was most of the jet fuel burned up in the first minute after the planes impacted?
4. Weren't these building designed to withstand multiple impacts?
5. If there was a "pile-driver" effect, where did this pile-driver disappear to?
6. Why were there squibs going up the sides of WTC7 immediately before it fell down perfectly?
7. Why wasn't the steel analyzed for explosives/demolition?
These are some of the questions that I wish had been discussed.
I can't believe that Coast to Coast
actually charges people to listen to archived material.
I missed the last hour and a half and wanted to hear it but not on the coast to coast site. Anyone record this ? Thanks
Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow
+1 for a download
Someone must have recorded it.
not sure what there is to debate
you either care to listen to the evidence that exists, or you choose to ignore it. 9/11 'debates' are about as intelligible as debating the existence of the easter bunny.
Thank you SteveMT, free listen links here
Here's some free listen links:
KVI in Seattle, Washington:
http://www.kvi.com/home/ondemand/4906711.html
WALG in Albany, Georgia:
http://player.cumulusstreaming.com/SLPLayer.aspx?WALG-AM
KFAQ in Tulsa, Oklahoma
http://www.1170kfaq.com/kfaqplayer.html
Real eyes realize real lies
2012, we want our country back
2012 is the year for Ron Paul!
MSM Report: http://www.msmreport.com/
You are very welcome.
Also, appreciate the links.
Meant to thank you Steve.
We had Richard Gage here in Houston at the University of Houston about 2 years ago now, he is outstanding.
I'm listening now, guess Richard won't start till a little later on.
Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow
My
local and semi-local radio stations do not broadcast Coast to Coast until the middle of the night. I hope someone tapes it and shares it online...
Sounds like an interesting show...
Berwick, Columbia County, Pennsylvania
Ron Paul 2012 - The People's Choice
rEVOLution SuperPAC: http://www.revolutionpac.com/
WTP Federal Lawsuit to BAN ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/Update2011-07-26...
Listen Live on the Internet
Most major stations will have live feed from their website. You no longer have to listen on an AM transistor radio since Al Gore invented the internet.
Listen live:
http://www.wlac.com/main.html
where do i click?
?
"listen live" button
ok, there's a "listen live" button right under the logo on the top left-hand side.
although,i don't hear anything right now.
So,
who's gonna play the shill debater on the show, and cite "Occam's Razor" and "Hanlon's Razor", and say "Prove it!", and roll their eyes while saying "conspiracy nuts are embarassing", etc, and all the other shill comments that we used to see every day here, before the topic was verboten?
It will be 2-for and 2-against with Ian Punnett trying to
moderate. No other subjects are scheduled, which means 4 hours of discussion. I got my chips and dip ready.
The debate
is over concerning these buildings having been demolished. Any reasonably intelligent person who has caught a smattering of what the firemen on the scene witnessed and heard knows these buildings didn't fall of their own accord. Just watching the manner in which they came down that day was reason to doubt the official fairytale.
Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow
Agree with you riceowlex.
I linked to a presentation by Dave Thomas attempting to debunk 911 truth. It is a joke. It does not debunk anything.
See what you think about this.
http://www.nmsr.org/911_may2010.pdf
You'd think that these so called debunkers
would be in short supply with all the evidence for what we know to be true. I've also got a theory that the perpetrators of 9/11 had planned for another drone to hit building 7, I'm thinking that is what was shot down in Pennsylvania. So instead of risk the wired building being found out they just lit it ablaze then demolished it. Building 7 video is the 9/11 Zapruder film.
Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow
They would have doctored the WTC7 building collapse....
videos if they had had the opportunity. WTC7 is still the smoking gum of 911. Tonight should be a very interesting discussion indeed. I don't want to believe that our gov. did this. It makes me sick. But look at some of the other "theories" that have been proven correct, and one says...yea, it is possible. They could have done it. Sickening!
Also, the Zapruder film was cut. They had plenty of time to "fix it," and they did. There are unexplainable jumps in the film at crucial moments.
Thanks for the bumps.