0 votes

Why is the Rockefeller group funding this Mosque in NYC?

From the Imam's own website:

http://www.asmasociety.org/home/p_support.html

The usual suspects are funding this Mosque just to divide and conquer and distract the people.

They want to distract the people so instead of talking about our government going out of control, we're talking about some bogus Mosque and the "scary" Muslim religion.

We're being played.

Make sure you email this list to these clowns:

me@glennbeck.com
hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Cavuto@foxnews.com
countdown@msnbc.com
hardball@msnbc.com
Foxreport@foxnews.com

Also, email it to the Judge:
freedomwatch@foxbusiness.com

And go to www.DrudgeReport.com and post a tip as well

We need to tell the establishment that we know this is a divide and conquer scheme and we're not going to fall for it.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bump

Makes sense. They love employing the divide and conquer strategy. Oh, and never ending wars to profit from.

Are any of the protestors hired by the day, week ?

.

Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow

Do you know if they're

Do you know if they're actually funding the mosque, or just other Muslim charitable programs. I looked on one of the Rockefeller Philanthropy sites and it says they give to the Muslim Women's Fund http://www.rockpa.org/Page.aspx?pid=309

Thank You !

mega bump

____

"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

the imam

has long had a working relationship with the US to promote moderate islam. The whole story and controversy, from a certain perspective, is hillarious.

Fortune Favors the Bold

Another great link

It also shows the Global Fund for Women supports them. That is remarkable because too many people think that Muslims abuse their girls and women. If Muslims, in general, do that then why is the Global Fund for Women supporting them? I wish people would stop collectivizing Muslim men.

Healthnut4freedom

The lip of truth shall be established forever: but a lying tongue is but for a moment...Lying lips are abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly are His delight. Prov 12:19,22

because

he supports a moderate vision of islam that somewhat respects women's rights

Fortune Favors the Bold

They are trying to start a war between the

Christains and the Muslins. Listen to Eustice Mullins.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7644857907453201814#

MSNBC

has it as, Whites against Muslims. They are seperating Whites from the majority. Whites are their second class crazies. Too stupid to know the laws of America. Which is what the contriversy really is about. Stupid white people.

I'm guilty by assocciation and genetics.

Stupid white people are similar to made up al'quida or Taliban, in their own Country ..We are hold outs that need to be eliminated . Politicly first and than rubbed out eventually because most whites claim Chirstianity.

I know the face of satan. It looks like a teddy bear.

Better off emailing the Judge

Better off emailing the Judge at freedomwatch@foxbusiness.com

Those other clowns are slaves for the Rockefeller criminals. You nailed it, it's all a distraction. They don't want people focused on the economy, failed wars, or the government trying to ban homegrown foods.

The Rockefellers are evil spawns of satanic scum.

This controversy is all pre-planned OF COURSE

please check out the July/Aug 2010 Foreign Affairs Magazine (the official publication of the CFR)

Please check out the August 30, 2010 edition of TIME Magazine.

please note the lead times to press and release while purusing these pubilications.

oh and of course the largest share holder of NewsCorp (other than Rupert Murdoch) has contributed heavily to the Muslim Center.

We could all go on and on...but for goodness sake the media has Middle America whipped into a god forsaken "God Fight". We all know these type of arguments are NEVER settled. Just the type of existential, amorphous threat that the evil, power hungry have exploited throughout history.

Ron Paul is right when he says this is just a play to reinforce the idea that Muslim Extremists were solely responsible for 9/11: Not Backlash or (dare I say it) some sort of conspiratorial plot too horrible to be taken seriously by the good people of These United States of America.

Oh that is just TOO good!

<:0

Thomas Jefferson: “Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever."

Viva La Revolucion!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmaTNf4YhEs

Thanks, for the

info.

"We can see with our eyes, hear with our ears and feel with our touch, but we understand with our hearts."

Jewish Angst?

could be...

And Liz Cheney and Bill Krystol

are getting funding for opposition to it. This is such a faked fight. The same people are fabricating support and opposition.

interesting

do you have any links?

Drudge & FOX are 100%

committed to Israeli war agenda..

So is MSNBC, CNN, CNBC and ABC.....

Seems there is not a single news network who does not parrot the same exact line.

Keith Olbermann is the same as Glenn Beck.

Both of them are profiteering opportunistic neocon crackpots....

As is Bill Maher.

Then somehow, out of the fire you have "Freedom Watch" which is the only TV station that gives opposition.

Yea and....

Freedom Watch is on Fox Business. If you have cable then you have to pay more to get that channel and in this economy I guess ol Murdoch feels safe letting it air to keep his image up knowing that people like me can't afford it. If it weren't for the DP I would be lost.

░░░░░░███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ ☻/
Il███████████████████]. /▌
◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤.. / \

Murdoch

is all about money and his own power. Whatever sells.

Fortune Favors the Bold

Its the most popular show on all of Fox

Which thankfully means the sleeping giant is awakening, Freedom Watch is the #1 rated show on TV.

But I never give any $$ to Fox.....Just watch "Freedom Watch" online for free...right where it belongs. Oh and of course the independent news.

http://whatreallyhappened.com

I assume you mean Fox Business

If true, that's interesting. Do you have a link to confirm that?

Fortune Favors the Bold

Yes, that is correct

http://www.therightscoop.com/judge-napolitano-at-the-america...

It pretty much nets an average of 50,000 viewers per day. On certain days, Freedom Watch has netted as many as 130,000 viewers to the Judge's program.

Freedom is popular....Its translated into nearly the most popular TV show with John Stossel runner up.

Which is why I highly suggest we use it.....as a platform to bring everybody to the liberty candidates & constitution where they can have real change.

http://www.liberty-candidates.org

Only problem is, we have to hijack the Glenn Beck supporters & lead them to the drinking well. That is the only way the Revolution will be a lasting success..

As much as people might want to trust Beck, they cannot do so as Beck's agenda is to drive all the "Freedom Lovers" right into the liberal neocon's hands. Same as any of them.

He can't really "be" on our side, but he can get the message out there.....yet our JOB is to bring them the rest of the way...To the Liberty candidates via Freedom Watch and successfully wake them up.

The people that are pushing the Mosque issue

are the same psycho-paths that did 9.11 & need the wars to go on forever.

The minute their is peace, people will realize the criminality.

I have soured on Ron Paul a little bit, because he is in-effective as a sucessfull legislator & his son is coming off like a NEO... but I am very proud of his postion on this subject.

God Bless the Truth Seekers.

I respect Corbett, but.....

I saw quite a few things on his 9-11 Youtube documentary that I did not like.

Comments such as "Perhaps it should be a synagogue or chapel that gets built there!" are making this issue worse.

Sorry but, with the amount of "surveillance" state setup now we know flat out they are watching. You figured that out right?

So when comments like those are posted everywhere, it gives them "ammo" to paint the entire movement as raving conspiracy-theorists and white supremacists.

They will pretty much jump on it and use broad brush strokes all over their media. We are setting ourselves up for a big shock if we think otherwise.

The better way to handle this is just refrain from having discussions about 9-11 until it can be aired in a court of law. These racists don't need ammo to "debate" what they did on National TV, and then proceed to label us all as militias. That's the exact kind of leverage we don't want to give them.....especially now that their image is so badly tarnished. Right?

I hate having to openly suppress discussion about 9-11 but to be serious here....such questions are so explosive they are better off being brought up in court and before Legal Counsel. Which will get all the MIC bastards thrown on the witness stand. Image is key to our overall success, especially in a Nationwide Trial. They need to always appear as the extremists & have it blow up in their face.

I was referring to your link, actually

On your link is where I made note of a lot of those comments, that were added on this very video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV56P159egU

I just bring it up because these videos take like a snapshot of everyone's comments, and use it for data-mining and unsavory purposes(whether we like it or not). Due to the nature of many of those comments, I felt that he should know. This isn't like a small thing - "people" record everyone's messages for up to 90 days & they also harass the radio hosts to get them fired.

that was a very good report

thanks for posting this. i will keep cobett in mind for future topics.

i randomly found this

"Answers from Mr. Verhagen, Minister of Foreign Affairs, to questions of members Wilders and Fritsma (PVV) on ‘the co-financing ... of a mosque on Ground Zero’.

Question 1: Is it true that Dutch taxpayers’ money is used for the support of the American Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMA), the organization Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf, who wants to build a mosque on Ground Zero?

Answer: No, the American Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMA) is not involved in the construction of a mosque at Ground Zero in the United States. For that reason, therefore, there is thus no Dutch tax money used.

However, the American Society for Muslim Advancement does receive subsidy from the Dutch MDG3 Fund to implement the program of the Women’s Islamic Initiative in Spirituality and Equity (WISE) Compact program. […]"

[end of Q&A]

continues...

"First: ASMA (American Society for Muslim Advancement) at the website of the Cordoba Initiative, which wants to build the mosque Ground Zero, is called a “partner organization”.

Second: The co-founder and Director of ASMA, Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf, is co-founder, Director and Chairman of the Board of The Cordoba Initiative.” Also Daisy Khan, director of ASMA, is co-founder and Director of The Cordoba Initiative [and wife of Rauf], which has as “principal place of business” the office address of the ASMA society."

see: http://bigpeace.com/nmay/2010/08/16/the-dutch-connection-the...

Conclusion: Contrary to what the Dutch Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Verhagen states (on behalf of former Minister Bert Koenders), ASMA is indeed related — and not insignificantly (including financially) — to the Cordoba Initiative, the organization that wants to build the Ground Zero mosque. Both Faisal Rauf and Daisy Khan represent “The Cordoba Initiative” and ASMA, and both organizations are deeply intertwined. This means a subsidy to ASMA for the WISE program also benefits The Cordoba Initiative organization.

Plot Thickens???

Well if only we could have the Tea Party care about THAT right at the very beginning, instead of the bash islam everywhere theme than we would get to the bottom of this....

I think its more than CLEAR what this was.

I support their freedom of religion according to property rights, but I definitely do not support the current leader of these establishments Feisal Abdul.

It's just what happens when you have foreign donors. They get mixed up in all kinds of bureaucratic crap, here we have the globalists sponsoring Abdul for another one of those circus shows.

I am sure that their plan was to do a false-flag attack and waste everyone's time. We need one politician, like Jake Towne to go on record and say point of fact "We do not support the Islamic center's LATEST leadership" - as he is clearly a manchurian candidate.

One point of fact about all this: It gets dragged out of nowhere while people are focused on banking. You don't know half of anything about these corporate funding partners or their donors, & really its all silly, because most of the time a State would not even allow someone with murky history to be teaching religious studies. They get disqualified due to risk of fraud.

So WHO put Abdul in the position he's in? Like I said its up to the States and States normally hire religious leaders/teachers off the street by doing thorough background checks. The very fact he sailed into New York with all this hush-hush funding and became a certified "leader" was flat suspicious. The State isn't stupid