So why is that the headline?
Can you add a link or video that discusses this?
Is it true? I don't know.
Real eyes realize real lies
We want our country back
Every year is a year for Ron Paul!
in a British paper.
But this video says none of that and thus does not support the headline.
It detracts from credibility of this site to do that.
That's all I'm saying.
Where is the Australian government in this? Where is his representation of his country?
He is a subject of the Realm, seems as though the EU laws supercede British laws. Seems as a sound precedent is being set if he is sent to Sweden. Is there an extradition treaty between Sweden and the UK?
This can and most likely will get very convoluted. We need some Brits or Aussies to weigh on this here imo.
p.s. Something is rotten in Denmark...and Strasbourg and Brussels imo. lol
there's no bail, you just go to court that day. Am I wrong?
..interesting post on lewrockwell.com:
bail from what I've seen/heard. He didn't refuse it.
Received this news blip on my email at the same time:
"The Federal Government (Canadian)has released its long-awaited Air India Action Plan, and it includes streamlining court procedures for terror trials and improving the witness protection program to ensure it is appropriately suited to the types of witnesses who need protection in terrorism cases."
So that they don't have to have witnesses - they can just claim they are keeping the identities of the witnesses secret for their protection.
MODS : Can you edit my title please? It appears from other news sources he actually turned himself in. I want the record to be clear that he went on his own and was not hunted down.
For some reason I can no longer edit the post.
Here is everything you need to know about the accusations.
Hope he stays safe!
where's the password for the "insurance file"?
"If this mischievous financial policy [greenbacks], which has its origin in North America, should become endurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debts. It will hav
for not using condoms.
This is one f***ed up world.
Actually, some people (read establishment) test what others will put up with by whether they will laugh. If they laugh, they'll let you get away with it. Thankfully, I haven't seen much laughter yet. People have stopped laughing at everything, and are about to fight back I think. FYI I distinctly saw the press release trials in several places seeing whether people would laugh at this or that. Notice the sex charge here is as phoney as the Lewinsky scandal with Clinton. It even involves a Clinton, Hillary da diplomat. Thats the reason likely.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.
Garden party sycophants are good at the blame game and schizoid paranoia requires being a control freak.
Like the arrogant and ignorant nomads of the african basins, the Agenda 21 people have the mindset of the Masai of Africa. It's ok to war on you, because they have the global rights to all cattle and therefore, anything or land that get's in their way, they claim as their destiny entitled by (you fill in the blank)
but I'd call it the religion of oppressor and victim.
“I’d rather have a farmer in front of me,
than a frontal assault on me!”
War is severely detached from nature. And Agenda 21 has been, is, and will be an assault on nature.
We are pushing back the corporate "masai" mindset of conquering your neighbor, but this super preditor beast blind rhino is a cancer upon the lands.
And never forget, “Humans, despite our artistic pretensions, our sophistication and many accomplishments, owe the fact of our existence to a six-inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains.”
Does this mean that the insurance file will be released?
Doubtful. He turned himself in. The way I read it, if they prevent wikileaks itself from operating, they will.
"Julian Assange has turned himself in"
Now it reads as if he's some kind of dangerous criminal who finally got caught against his will, and that's exactly how many people want to interpret this.
It's funny, and sad at the same time, how some people (sheeple I should rather say) are reacting with joy to this, happy that 'he has finally be caught' as if he were the reincarnation of Saddam Hoessein himself.
Relieved that they can continue buiseness as usual without having to read nasty stuff about their own governments in the newspapers on a daily basis (at least that's what they assume and hope for).
Glad that they can go back to their comfortable slumber, their usual smalltalk about who f*cks who in Hollywood.
Life must be easy for them, they have nothing significant to worry about, but when they find out this was just the tip of a very big iceberg, it'll be too late.
They don't like to think, it makes them unconformatable, so the story being over is 'good'. My observation is a lot of people on freerepublic are military and this way. Their sense of discussion is always sodomy and force, because that is only what they are good at - force. However, its the ideas of those that think that they always end up following, even if it is years later. Its pretty pathetic actually. Continue to have confidence in thinking ahead, and avoid the mob from letting you do it in the short term.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: