Ron Paul on GLENN BECK - Discussion on The Interview eo tempore
Submitted by imperium8infinitum8 on Tue, 12/18/2007 - 19:17
Discussion as the interview occurs....
»





















Youtube, glen beck & Ron Paul
sorry if you have it already,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZXWW4C2kpE
I missed it...
... sounds like it was pretty good overall. Can't wait till there are links posted.
As for 9/11 Truthers comments on here... Doctor Paul says we get our freedoms as individuals not as groups. We shouldn't be seperating our own ranks into minority groups. I believe there is alot wrong with the official story of 9/11 also... like how the heck those building fell in freefall speed when they were made to withstand plane hits... and no other building in History has collapsed from fire. There are questions to be answered still about it... some people I think might lean too much towards the conspiracy side for me.. but others won't even consider it at all. Our governments done it before... we may find out when President Paul has time to look into 911. Either way... our job is to get him elected and not argue about everything. His message of peace and freedom brought us all together. I'll defend all my brothers and sisters of freedom no matter what - when they attack one of us they attack all of us. Makes us stronger. We will win despite all the name calling and finger pointing the msm throws our way. We will stand together at every polling location across America and cast our votes. We are The Revolution - not black, white, hispanic, oriental, christian, atheist, catholic, muslim, homosexual, homosapien.... but AMERICAN! We are "The Revolution" and we endorse Dr Pauls message.
~Joe
Conspiracy Theories
I just shot Glenn Beck a thank-you.
As to the whole 9/11 Truthers / 9/11 Skeptics thing...
Here's what I take out of it. Who are the least trusting, most paranoid people in America? Probably conspiracty theorists. And if THEY trust Dr. Paul, then ANYONE can.
Where is YouTube link??
searches can't find it! It must be up there by now where is the link so all of us without cable or TVs can go watch?
I think DR.paul should have
confronted Beck politely, On his desire to have the military used on his supporters, How unconstitutional and un American is that idea? Other than that and his Swat protecting his family from Ron Paul supporters comment I believe it was an excellent interview and it reached millions.
Whatever your belief in the 9/11 subject, it has no place in the Ron Paul campaign, it hurts Ron Paul and all of us that are trying to help get him elected.That belongs at a 9/11 rally not at any Ron Paul event.If it is not DR. Paul's official stance on an issue, why harm the campaign by not being able to control yourself?
The violent Ron Paul supporters making threats on Ron Paul's behalf are not Supporting Ron Paul, they are hurting RP and the whole movement.
An example, at the Tea party that I attended a lot of home made videos were shown on a big screen , one of them was a mid evil type movie with Dr. Paul's face put on a character running around slaying other figures with other peoples faces, like beheading Rudy G. and others running for president, I don't remember seeing Beck as one of them, but people were cheering. Can you see how crazed we would all look if somebody taped this and got it to someone and they played it on TV or a political add.
Let's not be our own worst enemies.
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free".
Goethe
Violent Ron Paul supporters
There is absolutely no proof that those threatening emails were from actual Ron Paul supporters. Anyone, from any campaign can make those kinds of threats to discredit the campaign.
There's no privacy- you'd think the FBI would be all over those threatening emails if they were for real. Come on- let's all go back to being the smart adults we are. The are worried and using every dirty trick in the book.
I think some thanks are in order...
We asked for (demanded?) media exposure for Dr. Paul, and now he is getting it. I think a barrage of friendly emails can't hurt, as we work to address our own RP PR problems. I also offered him my prayers for his safety and the safety of his family. Whoever is threatening him (whether they 'support' RP or not), I hope that they are caught soon and brought to justice. There is simply no place for that crap in our midst.
For the uninitiated, Beck is unfortunately a hard-liner on Iraq. But he also does not serve as the GOP Echo Chamber the way Sean Vanity does. He regularly has guests he does not fully agree with (e.g. Michael Scheuer has been a guest more than once). He is not a 'journalist' as some have called him; he is paid to have an opinion. He also has the admiration of a lot of potential GOP voters. I think he treated RP with respect, and allowed him the time necessary to elaborate on his positions.
If the spirit moves you, here's his address: me@glennbeck.com
Peace be with you.
However Beck has behaved other days ...
... on this one he provided Ron Paul with a one hour forum, and gave him time to develop all of his answers to the questions that were asked. It was an excellent interview overall, and I sent a thank you email to him. The fact that he thought a guy with the moniker RonPaul2016 was a Ron Paul supporter was not the biggest error ever made: it is the idiot/criminal/coward using that name to try and sabotage Paul's campaign who is to blame, and not Beck (nor, of course, us).
No need to tell him that I found him unbearable on the few occasions I happened to turn on CNN Headline News during his show, and that I have no intention of watching him any day he is not interviewing a libertarian. Today, he is a journalist who did a fine job.
good idea
I emailed him and thanked him for having Dr Paul on the show.
~Joe
Threats on Glenn
I think that his statements of threats were outrageous. If he didn't want to show the proof on air why would he mention it on air and point the finger at Ron Pauls supporters.
Astounding
I think that the answers given by Dr. Paul were, on the whole, excellent. He was articulate, persuasive, and spoke truth.
I don't see Glenn Beck
I don't see Glenn beck asking the other candidates this question. He was ok for the most part but I still think his advertisers beat him up pretty good.
I think the Good Doctor acquited himself rather well tonigh. I just loved it when he basically turned the threat thing around on the ubiquitous Mr. Beck.
Go Ron Go...
Let's tell the advertisers and media what we really think.
http://www.2008SuperBoycott.com
http://www.2008SuperBoycott.com
We Just want Fair Coverage
No Glenn Beck attack on Ron Paul...
Its nice to be wrong. Not a bad thing to be wrong, and I am glad Dr Paul did not get attacked by Beck and got to speak his mind.
And so I am happy to be wrong, it all worked out well, no assasination attempt on Paul....[and by that term I mean character assasination only]..... but he did attack us in the Revolution and 9/11 skeptics, but Beck did not attack Dr. Paul. We 9/11 skeptics and revolutionaries can take the insults, and we can through them back at Beck at a later date.
But was it worth it? Was it worth going on this show? Beck did his name calling to others in the form of some kind of question to Ron Paul.
Well its nice to be wrong. I am glad it turned out ok. No "dean scream" came of it.
As far as 9/11 is concerned, you know Dr. Paul did not like the govt whitewash of it, but its wiser to be a skeptic, not put forth a theory on 9/11, and just poke holes in the official story. Demand answers, and I believe if given the chance, Ron would demand answers.
Ok guys, did we get Beck viewers to join the Paul campaign? Was it worth it?
You tell me.
As far as a threat on Becks life, I am surprised by it, and surprised he said it on the show and surprised he thinks its one of us..... Even so, I can't help but wonder if the threat came AFTER he threatened us in the Revolution. With the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, and the loss of habeaus Corpus, and treason being a Death Penalty, it was a serious threat against all of us. Perhaps Glenn Beck got a wake up call with all the RP people at his book events.
What is Glenn Beck's educational back ground.... mmm must wiki him. Certainly not a libertarian.
Treg
just a quick comment on the "dean scream"
Just a thought.....i think the "dean scream" destroyed Dean because he did not speak real truth, and even though his campaign had fervent, disgruntled supporters, it is strange how he was abandoned after that event.
I guess my question is......because Dr. Paul speaks so much truth, would it really even be possible for him to have a dean scream moment? Unless he does something totally off the wall, I think the media would have a hard time framing a RP action as a crazy dean scream moment, and that thing later going on to ruin his campaign.
I guess what I'm thinking is that unless RP does something absolutely un-RP, a dean scream moment is very unlikely to hurt RP.
Today Glenn Beck...Next Larry King?
now how do we get him on Larry King Live - that would give him some true legitimacy in the eyes of MSM followers!
Wouldn't it be great to see him interviewed on Larry King just before the Iowa and New Hampshire nominations?
"Liberty tastes sweetest to those who fight for it, and most bitter to those who work to deny it!"
LearnRonPaul
Larry King gives a great interview.
Larry King is great,.....and he interviewed the former president of mexico and got the Amero remark.... I think Larry must know about the NAU. I hope Ron gets on Larry King. When you get King you have arrived! Lets email Larry King.
Treg
Here's Larry's link
Former Mexican President Vicente' Fox even hinted at the NAU to Larry when he appeared on the program.
Larry might be interested in Dr. Paul's thoughts - If Dr. Paul mentioned Fox's remarks, maybe they would even air it again!
Here's a link that might help us get Dr. Paul on the show:
http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form4.html?83
"Liberty tastes sweetest to those who fight for it, and most bitter to those who work to deny it!"
LearnRonPaul
Sent e-mail
Hope it helps.
my english professor....
for some reason thought Larry King was a joke, and he would not allow him for the blogs we had to write. My view was that the media as a whole is a joke, and to suppose that any part of the media has more legitamacy than Larry King was a joke in and of itself. In fact, I think Larry King would give RP a respectful, fair, and interesting interview. As such, I agree, I'd love to see him on LK.
E-mail Larry King for Dr. Paul Appearence
Tge point is to reach out to as many people as possible - Larry has a wide audience and many would learn from Dr. Paul's message!
"Liberty tastes sweetest to those who fight for it, and most bitter to those who work to deny it!"
LearnRonPaul
The best thing would be
The best thing would be Oprah, although the odds of that are dubious. Her reach goes straight to America's heartland. Talk shows and late-night comics are really the way to reach Americans.
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
Plus she now endorses Obama
Stedman's packing as we speak!
"Liberty tastes sweetest to those who fight for it, and most bitter to those who work to deny it!"
LearnRonPaul
Great interview overall.
Great interview overall. Other than Glen Beck bringing up the threats he got from a few minority of Ron Supporters. He should have started that segment out with, this happened after I had a segment on my show with guests and myself calling Ron Paul supporters a domestic threat and a kin to Islamic terrorists. He gave a perfect example of why people are aggressive against another, he attacked Ron Paul supporters first. It doesn't justify and violent threats, but he should have mentioned it. I doubt he had many if any threats before that.
9/11 truthers
Hopefully this interview will help weed out some of the 9/11 truthers from the movement, and in doing so attract more people to the campaign that have been turned off by them at gatherings handing out flyers, etc.
9/II truthers vs 9/11 skeptics
Skeptics have no theory as to what happened, just want better answers.
I'm a 9/11 truther too
And I'm not going anywhere. I didn't start supporting Ron Paul because I think he believes or doesnn't believe in 9/11 being an inside job, even if just partially.
I support Ron Paul because of his ideas and his honesty.
9/11 is a different issue. To me the possibility of 9/11 being an inside job shows just how messed up our government really is, and how much they lust for control over the people in this country, by scaring them.
My stance with Ron Paul and 9/11, is simply this. Under a Paul administration I don't think any false flag terror would be being done from orders of the executive branch. We would have a executive branch we could trust. So it doesn't matter to me if Ron Paul doesn't believe the whole 9/11 thing. He doesn't have to. The fact that he is an honest man who understands false flag terror and the dangers of it, means you have nothing to worry about with him.
So once again, as a 9/11 truther I am not going anywhere. I am not supporting Ron Paul based on 9/11, I am supporting him based on him being someone that such possibilities, and corruption, won't exist.
I'm a 911 Truther
and..........I'm not going anywhere. I'm not part of this Revolution because of 911. I'm part of this because I believe in Ron Paul.
baubaublacksheep
have you any wool?
what is that song about anyway? its prolly got some crazy hidden messages or meanings....maybe not.
read below for my stance on 9/11.
ive got no beef with the truthers....
I think we can all agree that there is no idea which should not be discussed, no matter how crazy. I think a lot of truthers are motivated by the fact that they feel their viewpoint is being surpressed as part of the alleged conspiracy. Whether or not this is true, if so many people feel this way, there should certainly be a venue to discuss the opposing viewpoints, and the dinosaur media has not provided this. If the conspiracy turns out to be outrageous than most reasonable people will discount it. I think the frustration arises from the fact that so many are intent on keeping it from being fully discussed out in the open, as if it is crazy or unpatriotic to consider such things. My opinion is that, inevitably, the only way to settle this once and for all is to address every single argument, and to fully analyze all of the claims to make sure once and for all that the US gov was not in any way involved. If all the claims cannot be put to rest then perhaps the truthers have some good points.
To further illustrate my point.....if someone came up to you and told you that the Earth is flat, you wouldn't get upset because the truth is obvious. In the same way, if all the arguments are laid out, and it is obvious that the US had no part in 9/11, then no one would get upset when someone continues to say that the gov played apart, it would simply be absurd. Only in this fashion can this whole thing be put to rest. The truthers are frustrated, and want a means to voice this frustration, so we, as non-truthers, should fully encourage a venue for discussion if we are so confident in our viewpoints.
No Secrets
When Dr. Paul is President, and he begins to create the open, "no-secrets" government he speaks about, perhaps we will learn more about many of the conspiracy claims that have been around for years! UFO's, JFK, etc.
Some may prove viable, some may not but whatever the truth, to get us there will require patience, unity and hard work!
Let's not be divided anymore - that's old political thought from the machine as we know it!
Let;s get Dr. Paul elected first!!!!
"Liberty tastes sweetest to those who fight for it, and most bitter to those who work to deny it!"
LearnRonPaul