Ron Paul 2012??? Diebold VS Paper BallotsSubmitted by Thomas on Fri, 12/24/2010 - 22:33
Diebold VS Paper Ballots (my first post on DP resurrected)
Submitted by Thomas on Wed, 06/13/2007 - 11:28
in Daily Paul Liberty Forum
Forgive me if this topic has been covered but here it is anyway.
There must be away to "Fast Track Emergency Legislation" so we are able to cast our votes with old style paper ballot and not the electronic voting machines (even the ones that give you a paper receipt) which have been proven to be tampered with easily.
This early in the game I can see the possibility of Mr Paul winning the election and helping to restore this once great nation to it's past glory and freedoms we once had.
Maybe a Supreme Court Emergency Injunction banning the machines?
Anyone have an answer to this?
All our hard work will be for naught if this is not done.
Okay I went to: http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
The problem with this is thus; You vote for candidate A. You get a paper receipt from the machine that says you voted for candidate A
But what happens is the machine tallys the vote for candidate B
Then Faux news and all the other mainstream says candidate B won the election And most of the uneducated Americans believe them . I have never used the electronic machines myself but would make the assumption that the paper receipt that you get is just like a cash register receipt you get from circuit city or wherever that is very fragile and the print on it will completely disappear with exposure to sunlight in a short time. I WANT THE HEAVY NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO DESTROY PAPER BALLOTS WITH THE STANDARD ARROW TO POINT TO CANDIDATE AND HANDLE TO PUNCH OUT THE DARN CHAD Then if there is a recount or anything is questionably about the election there will be durable paper to count. AND I WANT 6th grade math wizards to do the recount if there is to be one........Kids would do a better job than the last recount fiasco. Thomas
(edit:this needs to be rectified before we get too far into 2011 especially if Ron Runs)