Dov Zakheim and 911, From Freedom of Information Act Request

This is from a conversational thread at Christian Forums on 911 Truth, information which blew me away and details I didn't know on Zakheim, all backed up, hard sources. This is rough cut post I'll tighten it in the morning. Man this is really coming into focus.

------------
http://www.christianforums.com/t7521066-17/

Trogdor the Burninator--No - the overwhelming evidence is for the official version. Unless you have some pictures, radar tracks, video or witness testimony that proves otherwise.

Funny you should mention that. Just so happens that one of the war games they had scheduled for that morning was a hijack scenario which had a plane crashing into the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO,) where they usually capture satellite imagery of the DC airspace. That means all flying objects, flight paths, close-ups. Wouldn't you know it, because of the drill and the building evacuation that imagery is not available. Just like all the Pentagon surveillance video, the most heavily surveillanced building in the world. Just like all the black boxes from the planes. Just like the 95% of the steel evidence at the WTC that was shipped off to China to be melted in record speed. See the pattern here? The destruction of evidence and missing evidence is evidence in itself. Yet you just keep repeating "overwhelming evidence is for the official story." How is it "overwhelming," besides being "overwhelming" (your circular style of argument.) Google "historycommons national reconnaissance office"

Trogdor the Burninator:
Electronically hijacked - you're back to the same problem as the towers - you need weeks to install control equipment in an aircraft that was owned by a private co - and you need to keep it from being seen by maintenance personnel.

Ok folks, this is where it gets good. What most people don't know is that most commercial jetliners are already capable of flying and landing themselves. Chances are you've already been on a plane that was on auto-pilot when you landed. You enter flight path and it works with GPS. It's very accurate, and the GPS could be programmed to hit a target like the towers. It becomes much more accurate if a homing beacon is installed as a bullseye.

There is also well-known technology which allows ground controllers to seize a plane's controls from a hijacker and to land it remotely. it is based on off-the-shelf technology which you now see hundreds of times a day in the skies of Afghanistan, in unmanned drones. The pilot is actually sitting in an air-conditioned trailer on Creech Air Force Base in Nevada. The largest unmanned jet flying is the Global Hawk, about the size of a Lear Jet.

This last technology is FTS, for Flight Termination System, was pioneered by SPS International, System Planning Corporation, whose CEO in 2001 was Dov Zakheim. SPC is a defense contractor majoring in electronic warfare technologies, including remote-controlled aircraft systems, and the Flight Termination System. Zakheim was appointed the Pentagon's chief financial officer by Bush and this was his position at the time $2.3 trillion was announced missing from the Defense Department on the day before 9/11/2001. Zakheim was also a member of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), and one of the signers of both a letter to Bill Clinton in 1998 urging the overthrow of Saddam by force, and PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses," which recognized such an invasion might be impossible unless the U.S. got a "new Pearl Harbor." Other signers of these documents were Dick Cheney, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and Donald Rumsfeld.

Maybe coincidentally, Zakheim's SPS oversaw the investigation of the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. This would have given them intimate knowledge of the security systems and structural blueprints of the World Trade Center.

You will find all this if you google "Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions"

Okay, ready for this? As Comptroller of the Pentagon, Zakheim contracted to have 32 Boeing 767s, the same kind of plane which hit WTCs 1 and 2, refitted as tankers to replace aging KC-135s, at MacDill AFB, in Florida, as part of the Boeing /Pentagon tanker lease agreement. Then in 2008 in response to a Freedom of Information Act Request, it turned out that Bush and others lied about this kind of technology not being tested and available. If you google "remote controlled passenger plane 911 historycommons" you will find this eye-opening report:

A Raytheon 727 lands in New Mexico in August, 2001. [Source: Associated Press]

It is reported that the US company Raytheon landed a 727 six times in a military base in New Mexico without any pilots on board. This was done to test equipment making future hijackings more difficult, by allowing ground control to take over the flying of a hijacked plane. [Associated Press, 10/2/2001; Der Spiegel (Hamburg), 10/28/2001]

Several Raytheon employees with possible ties to this remote control technology program appear to have been on the hijacked 9/11 flights (see September 25, 2001). Earlier in the year, a specially designed Global Hawk plane flew from the US to Australia without pilot or passengers. [Independent Television News, 4/24/2001]

However, most media reports after 9/11 suggest such technology is currently impossible. For instance, the Observer quotes an expert who says that “the technology is pretty much there” but still untried. [Observer, 9/16/2001]

An aviation-security expert at Jane’s Defence Weekly says this type of technology belongs “in the realms of science fiction.” [Financial Times, 9/18/2001; Economist, 9/20/2001]

Even President Bush appears to deny the technology currently exists. He gives a speech after 9/11 in which he mentions that the government would give grants to research “new technology, probably far in the future, allowing air traffic controllers to land distressed planes by remote control.” [New York Times, 9/28/2001]

This is SPC/Dov Zaheim's Flight Termination System, which is really just an elaborate version of what drone pilots in Nevada do with unmanned planes in Afghanistan every day.

Is all this starting to snap into focus?

More about that missing $2.3 trillion, the Pentagon plane hit a fairly unpopulated part of the Pentagon by circing around to the landward side (away from the Potomac). Who WAS in that part of the building? Google: "Army unit piecing together accounts of Pentagon attack" to see this report:

"One Army office in the Pentagon lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts."

Accountants. Hmm.