2 votes

So just how does one live WITHOUT Social Security?

Originally published 2011-01-06 20:02:
- - -
With all the energy now aimed at cutting Social Security (and not the Trillion Dollar Wars) by both political Parties (including Obama's own deficit commission), just how then is one supposed to live -- without Social Security?

Many jobs and occupations become unsustainable as you become older and older. People's physicial abilities and stamina simply diminish (through no fault of their own), and also the underlying technologies and skills required change and transform with time so rapidly that even well educated people can become de-facto obsolete in their jobs, and no longer marketable. And the stress level and exhaustion level for many jobs just aren't well suited for people that are in their 60s. Finally, its just a fact that health issues will make older people more frail, more vulnerable, and less effective than younger people. While there are some occupations that can be sustained into old age (successful book author, owning a successful business that's mostly run by others, etc.), many, many professions and occupations cannot be sustained. People simply need to retire, and they cannot just work until "they've fallen and can't get up" (and then how do the bills get paid?). Retirement is a necessity for most.

So to retire at the age of 65, you would need to create a yearly revenue stream for yourself that would support all of your expenses, and could last for up to 35 years.

So if you need $40,000-per-year to pay for all your housing/taxes/health-care/food/utilities/automobile/phone/internet/insurances/and other miscellaneous expenses, then this means one of two things:

1) You have savings of at least: $1,400,000.00 (40,000 * 35 years), and therefore can draw down $40,000 each and every year - until the point where you will eventually be totally broke then at age 100. Of course, if you live up to 100, or you have a major surgery or hospital procedure that Medicare won't cover, or you have some other unforseen expenses, then you're screwed anyway -- even with 1.5 million.

2) Your savings (however much that is) can be put into some investment that will predictably and safely generate back $40,000 a year, and also not lose its principal value. With interest rates at 0%-1% I don't know what the hell that would be -- such an investment simply does not exist.

___

So please tell me, how the heck do you retire without Social Security? This is just impossible for 95% of the population.

In today's times with the cost of living so damn high, people living from paycheck-to-paycheck, and Employers not giving raises, how does anyone possibly save up a whopping 1.5 Million dollars?

Most people can't even afford to buy one house (and those that do are borrowing virtually all the money).

And where oh where can you ever put your money and invest it in something -- such that it is not put at any risk, and can also generate back a steady $40K or so for paying all the bills over the course of the year?

There is no such investment. It doesn't exist.

So, for people who are not wealthy, what do you do without Social Security.

The vast majority of the people, are going to need it. But if there is some secret alternative investment strategy that I haven't heard about that will magically produce the scenarios of 1 or 2 (above) -- I'd sure like to know about it.





Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Yeah, thought about that reverse mortgage thing.

But, do really trust the banks to give you 80% of the current market value of your home and let you just stay there for 20 or 30 years, undisturbed? I don't.

“It is the food which you furnish to your mind that determines the whole character of your life.”
―Emmet Fox

And one more suggestion...

you better figure it out quick because it's not gonna be around very much longer!!!

When Fascism goes to sleep, it checks under the bed for Ron Paul!

Well first off, being able to

Well first off, being able to retire isn't a right. You might just have to work until you're dead. But if you reach retirement age your expenses shouldn't be high (if you still have stuff like car payments, that was probably poor planning on your part). But social security was never created to sustain somebody's life and act as the sole yearly budget for an older person. It was supposed to be extra padding.

But if we ever got to the point of eliminating social security, that would also mean we should no longer have income taxes, payroll taxes, etc. Basically none of the fruits of your labor would be taxed away. Wouldn't you rather keep 25% of your income? Don't you think you can do a much better job of saving and/or investing it than the government? Sure some people won't save and invest. Some people will squander it away. But that's their choice; they must live with that mistake.

Unfortunately, the majority of the people want the government to take care of them from cradle to grave. They don't want personal ownership. Fortunately, we're making headway into that mindset.

I agree with you BUT

I don't think that is what he was saying.

Don't make him (or her) feel bad about 'poor planning'. Jeeze. I just helped get my Aunt and Uncle into a lovely assisted living facility (their children, I guess, do not want to host them and they WANT to live there) They have planned fastidiously for this for decades. They have money saved.

HOWEVER despite all that planning my uncle has had well over a third world nation's national budget in operations. My Aunt is in early stages of Alzheimers and even with all of their careful planning for "retirement" they will only have a three decent years at this facility before it's all for not.

My Uncle will probably die before then. But maybe not. My Aunt will probably live forever. The more I look at life here in America the more I realize the end game is to make sure that we die broke. If you have been good slaves (like my aunts generation) they will keep you alive to move money around till it literally kills you. My aunt just finished Chemotherapy for breast cancer she's 78 for God's sake. MOST of the people in the waiting room waiting for their EXPENSIVE government dose of chemo were well over 80 years old. I was beside myself. No one wants to die especially when faith is constantly diminished (and I'm not a bible thumper but its clear the US has very little faith) and when your doctor keeps pushing pills at you as if aging were a disease and not a fact of life.

Moving them into that facility was an eye opener. I will not be putting my mother into one of those. I will take care of her. And I hope that my children learn from the experience, because hopefully I will have a family that helps me on the way out like I helped them on the way in.

I totally get where the guy that posted this is coming from.

IMO

If the value of the civil currency was restored, there would be less need for dependency on public chapters like SocSec.

As SocSec is arranged today it is an unethical institution which relies on taxation under threat of violence to fund its operations, it coerces citizens into participating, and condescendingly presumes all individuals are incapable of providing for themselves into seniority.

Otherwise I would endorse a model where the prerogative of individual choice concerning public endowment [ex. SocSec] is dignified, and the right to withdraw from institutional abuse (including all taxation) is reserved.

More here
http://facebook.com/FreeDominionPoliticalParty

From a Historical Perspective :

This "security" idea's been around a loooong time.

From : Common Law Social Security/

Believe it or not, a type of social security was established in England by the Statute of Charitable Uses (43 Eliz. c. 4, 1601). In this Statute you will find every description that your social security number covers, and everything your income tax pays for.

A. "whereas lands, tenements, rents, annuities, profits, hereditament, goods, chattels, money and stocks of money have been heretofore given, limited, appointed and assigned, as well by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, and her most noble progenitors, as by sundry other well-disposed person; some for relief of aged, impotent and poor people, some for maintenance of sick and maimed soldiers and mariners, schools of learning, free schools and scholars in universities, some for repair of bridges, ports, havens, causeways, churches, sea-banks and HIGHWAYS, some for education and preferment of orphans, some for or toward relief, stock or maintenance for houses of correction, some for marriages of poor maids, some for supportation, aid and help of young tradesmen, handicraftsmen and persons decayed, and others for relief or redemption of prisoners or captives, and for aid or ease of any poor inhabitants concerning payments of fifteens, setting out of soldiers and OTHER TAXES ...***...

[ Emphasis added ]

These Trusts defined in the Statute of Charitable Uses are either eleemosynary or governmental trusts and it is highly apparent to me that it is this Statute from which the United States Government drew its authority to create the Social Security Act with the support of the income tax. After all just where does your tax dollars go? To the above. And doesn't all the above require a number?

Continued at URL :

http://www.the-legacy.info/Common%20Law%20Social%20Security.htm

The Constitution is a Trust : http://www.The-Legacy.Info

SPEND LESS

No fancy TV, no going out, you can live quite nicely at 1970s standards which are not so bad and keep plenty of savings on hand.

It's your need to keep up with the Joneses which causes you to not have the money you desire.

Wrong.

No fancy tv, no premium cable channels, no cell phone, no remodeling to keep up with the times and fashion, no purchases of anything that are not essential, etc., etc. Still allow myself the luxury of a computer to keep up with what's really going on in the world. Savings just about depleted keeping up with the ever increasing costs of utilities and property taxes. We are unable to get "fair market value" for our house (which, by the way would be a couple hundred thousand LESS that the actual value of the house and lot). Social Security is what is still putting food on the table and paying for the insurances. Next step is homelessness.

I do agree that the young people should be given the option to "opt out" of the system. I just wish we had been given that choice, since we would have had invested that money a lot more wisely than the government did. No hands would have been in the cookie jar leaving IOUs.

“It is the food which you furnish to your mind that determines the whole character of your life.”
―Emmet Fox

"We are unable to get "fair market value" for our house

which, by the way would be a couple hundred thousand LESS that the actual value of the house and lot)."

That's your first mistake. Your home and many homes are not worth and never were worth what they were when you bought it most likely.

The only thing, and I know this would be hard to do, you have left hopefully, is that you're not upside down in the mortgage. If you have ANY equity.. be smart and sell it off now before they finish you off through currency debasement.

If you can, buy a remote piece of property and go off grid... now. you're privy to knowledge most people don't have. Take advantage of it and act.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

"Actual value" means what it would cost to rebuild

the house, in it's current form, plus the price of the land it sits on. So, yes, the actual value of my house is a couple of hundred thousand LESS that current "fair market value". The neighborhood has changed and the housing market is in the tank, making fair market vaule substantially less than actual value.

Unfortunately, current personal circumstances do not allow us to sell and move on right now. Tried to sell before my husband got sick but, could not. Hopefully, as soon as conditions change, I can sell and get close to fair market value. Not much of a mortgage lien at all, so that's not an issue, thankfully.

Thanks for the advice about going off the grid with a remote piece of property, rp4pres. Any suggestions? I don't have a clue how to go about getting off the grid.

“It is the food which you furnish to your mind that determines the whole character of your life.”
―Emmet Fox

I suppose if you have the money to

get and install solar panels and all of the needed pieces to that puzzle, you could do off-grid where you are.

I'd look through my house too and get rid of the large energy users, like a "modern" fridge/freezer setup.. You can actually get two used deep freezers.. use one for a freezer and the other can be easily modified to be the most efficient refrigerator, you've ever seen by far. I think the report I read was about 200watts consumed in a 24 hour day.

Maybe check into steam engines and grid tie-ins too. You can actually take a very easy steam engine converted from an IC engine and charge a battery pack as a backup for your solar.

The thing is, I could give you a hundred ideas, but would you actually make the changes and do the work needed to learn.

Also, the remote land was an alternative to your present situation. Having land like that if you have no reason to leave where you are is more or less just a vacation spot and more bills.. unless you use it as a backup bug out spot.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

I agree with Nonna

#

http://simplefactsplainargume

http://simplefactsplainarguments.blogspot.com/2013/01/social...

Maybe if dividends didn't get taxed so highly people could retire and live off them. And no, you can't stick your money into one investment and expect it to give you returns year after year. You have to keep doing homework (it's your retirement, after all) and keep picking good stocks.

So if there's not one investment that you can just leave alone for 40 years while you sit around and collect dividends, then how would a government program like SS possibly be better? You think the government will be able to post a profit? That's idiotic. THERE IS NO MONEY LEFT IN SOCIAL SECURITY. So stop acting like the government can do a better job of taking care of people than individuals can on their own.

Simple Facts and Plain Arguments
A common sense take on politics and current events.

www.simplefactsplainarguments.com

Do what old folks used to do

Move in the with the kids.

Author of Shades of Thomas Paine, a common sense blog with a Libertarian slant.

http://shadesofthomaspaine.blogexec.com

Also author of Stick it to the Man!

http://www.amazon.com/Stick-Man-Richard-Moyer/dp/1484036417

there are people 'in between'--

the welfare recipient/impoverished and those who have been successful enough to 'retire' without SS at a decent age.

Some of *us* were stupid enough to:

--do work that wasn't tied to the military industrial complex and didn't pay very well, in spite of college degrees and excellent skills/working habits

--pay into SS

--get ourselves downsized

We worked our fingers to the bone, quite literally (both of us are underweight now in our 60s)--

and at one point our hours were cut so deeply that the employer said, "why don't you just 'retire' and collect SS?"--

It was our only option. There were no other jobs in the area or in our area(s) of expertise--

We will have to work 'forever'--

part-time or as long as the work lasts.

Even for those of *us* who have fed ourselves (gardening, cooking from scratch, gleaning, foraging, preserving, buying in bulk and locally)--

and put by for a 'rainy day'--

get old.

We refuse to use government health care programs; we are not enrolled in any of them, but we can't afford insurance.

We live day to day and watch those who invested in the military or medical industrial complex take cruises--

but we feel good about how we lived and what we did with our time, our health, our strength and our lives--

but the fact is that you can get to where you wear out. Some people wear out in their 50s (thank heavens we didn't), some in their 60s, some not until their 70s.

The truth is that genetics plays a big role and a person's childhood plays a large role, dietary practices do matter, though we've always eaten MUCH better than the standard American diet.

There are people still working in their 80s, and there are people who are worn out in their 50s.

Sometimes hard work CAN wear a person out--

we've both worked since we were very young; we both had to; one of us had an impoverished family and had to put food on the table, the other of us had no family and had to work, because at 18 there would be no more foster home--

We watched our friends have more 'carefree' childhoods. Most of our friends and peers didn't have to work as hard to get through college--

but we didn't break down 'til our 60s--

and we're still working. There are days when we wonder how much longer we can keep going, but there really isn't an option. Until God decides it's your time to go, you have to keep moving. (*partly tongue in cheek, but lots of truth there*)--

the idea of 'golden' years is a big laugh--

but then we had special needs kids (some of them)--

and our children who aren't special needs have also struggled financially--

we had no parents to help us or be grandparents for our children. There was so safety net for us, and our children will not take care of us--

We count on God to do that, after we've put in a hard day's work.

But at hard day's work in the 60s can't be as much as a hard day's work in the 30s--

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Can you save $4,000 per year

Can you save $4,000 per year during your working life?
That should be reasonable. Just live within your means.
If you invest $40,000 per year for your working life of 40 years at 6% (easily doable),you will end up with $656,000. Perhaps not the $1.5 million you desire, but sufficient.
Now, if you continue earning 6% interest on that $656,000 then you will be able to take out $45,000 for 30 years.
Please do some learning about compound interest.

Is it perfectly safe? No. Nothing is perfectly safe. If you want to be safe, then suffer living on $21,800 per year instead of $45,000.

And if you are too stupid to plan for your own future, then plan on working until you die. Or, have your kids take care of you. They do owe it to you anyway as you took care of them.

Grow up, and accept responsibility for yourself.

“If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.”

I just retired

I start collecting SS next month. I also have some savings, but not enough to live on forever. I'm married and still healthy enough to work, so I plan to start working part time maybe later this year or next year, but I could not do this without SS.

On a side note, I'm sitting here reading the comics, and the Doonesbury comic strip points out that cutting SS by 10% will save $60 billion by 2040, but cutting out the war in Afghanistan will save $150 billion in two years.

Don't look at the problem as

Don't look at the problem as "if I didn't have Social Security, then I wouldn't survive". Well the government created that dependency when they decided to start taxing income and making you poorer. If you started your working career with no income tax, no payroll tax, no any kind of with holdings of your paycheck. And you were given free reign of 100% of your income the rest of your life, you would have every opportunity to succeed.

If the government didn't take about 25% of income your whole life, and you could then save/invest that money yourself, you would more than likely have more of a budget than you do on Social Security.

Nowadays, just simple yearly savings can still net you a budget double or triple that of a SS check.

jrd3820's picture

Depends on how old you are

I am relatively young still so I am not worried about having to live without social security. It's math. Math is a universal constant.

Live within your means and start saving now. Forget about SS, pretend it's not even there (because... well... it's not). I understand if you have been counting on SS your whole life, it is not as easy as pretending it's not there, but there are still tons of ways to live cheap.

First, tell your doctor to eff off. You do not need half of the crap he/she tells you that you need anyways. That should save you some $.

Then remind your children (if you have them, I do not plan on it so this all on me) that you brought them into this world. That is all you have to say, that should save you some money also.

Garden garden garden garden garden. I am not even necessarily talking about a huge sprawling garden (although that would be preferable), you can do a lot of gardening inside even in smaller living spaces. Seriously, this can save you tons of money. Also, eating healthier will save you money on medical problems that will go away.

Cut your cable and internet. I would go as far as to say cut your cell phone, but most people I know say I am a bit extreme when it comes to what I will and won't pay for.

You do not need new clothes or shoes. Clothes are clothes, shoes are shoes. They are irrelevant. This might sound petty, but really you can save a lot thinking like this.

If you must have an additional income there are tons of ways to make extra money. I teach a SAT prep class 2 nights a week at the library. I started out volunteering, but it eventually grew into a paying gig. It does not pay much, but I do not need much because of how I live. Make something and sell it online. Do some freelance writing or something. I think someone below mentioned something about rental properties. My parents have decent success with this. Personally, I think it would muddy my finances with things like loans and dependency on renters, but it is not the worst idea either.

Forget the word need. There is little you need in this world, and money is not one of the things you need.

Good luck.

Great reply. Might I add, To

Great reply. Might I add, To live simply - Simply live. My Grandmother would always say that. I never understood what she meant as a kid, but I get it now.

jrd3820's picture

I like that

There is a difference between "need" and "want." Needs are basic, and there are few. Shelter, Nutrition, water. After that if you want something bigger or better work your ass off for it and make it work, but you can do it without credit or government loans.

My other answer

would be to stop creating so much inflation that the cost of living continues to balloon at such a preposterous pace. If someone could still live for a couple of bucks a year, you wouldn't need any income or investments.

Also we should stop pretending that everyone is going to live to be 100. When there are perfectly healthy individuals that mysteriously and suddenly die in their 50's, they aren't too much better off having made all those Social Security payments, are they?

Keep you SS and your government I will take care of myself

until i cant then thats it. Keep you dictatorship keep your extorted theft called tax keep your proclaimations. And Ill keep my FREEDOM.

sovereign

My plan: Have children and raise them as humans

Hope they take care of you.
Plan B: Work at ACE hardware

My thinking

is that this is a bit of a trick question. The burden of proof for any intervention should lie on its supporters to show that the program is indefinitely sustainable.

My understanding is that Social Security is flawed by design and that the "trust fund" is a charade, so it inevitably will go bankrupt and the government will be unable to make good on its promises. If that is true, then it doesn't really matter whether ideologically you think that its a good idea or not.

The same way...

we live without socialism!
Independent means not depending on anyone!!!
Socialism means depending on someone...

When Fascism goes to sleep, it checks under the bed for Ron Paul!

You restore the family farm.

Old people on farms seem to stay healthy until the end. When one earns their daily bread, embraces their place in the circle of life, the idea of "retirement" becomes silly. If they kick us off the land, everyone is screwed.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

I agree . . .

one set of grandparents lost the farm; the other set sold the farm--

sad--

wanted land; couldn't get it.

Use every square foot of our backyard, though--

:)

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

True Fishy...

and the children continued to run the family farm and took care of the elderly when they were too old to work anymore...
Remember the Waltons? -it included fiction drama but still based on old life styles.

what Fishy said. Buying and

what Fishy said. Buying and renting real estate, and operating your own business are pretty much the only other answers.

The days of sticking principle in the bank and living off interest have come and gone. Even the stock market is a suckers bet. It's been artificially held up by the FED the last 4 years. In REAL terms though, it's not even keeping pace with inflation.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul