0 votes

Dr Wakefield demands retraction -- documents prove innocence from allegations of vaccine autism data fraud


(NaturalNews) In light of new evidence that has emerged clearing Dr Wakefield of the allegations that he fabricated study data involving MMR vaccines and symptoms of autism, Dr Wakefield is now publicly demanding a retraction from the British Medical Journal and author Brian Deer. Documents just made public reveal that another medical research team which included a senior pathologist independently documented evidence of a possible MMR vaccine - autism link 14 months before Dr Wakefield's paper first appears in The Lancet -- based on several of the same children appearing in Dr Wakefield's study. (http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_D...)

These documents include detailed clinical notes describing the pathology in seven children following MMR vaccination. These notes include references to "autism" and chronic gastrointestinal inflammation, among others.

This evidence, which was just made public, refutes the accusations of fraud leveled against Dr Andrew Wakefield by the British Medical Journal and reporter Brian Deer. This evidence was made available to the BMJ before the publication of their accusations, but they chose to ignore it. Dr Wakefield, in essence, has been falsely accused by the BMJ in what is now being widely recognized as a political witch hunt against the most visible researcher questioning the safety of MMR vaccines.

The BMJ, in essence, has been caught pulling off what may be the largest scientific fraud ever perpetrated by any medical journal in the history of the world.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Andrew Wakefield's claims against MMR were based on a severe conflict of interest. The global scare rested on claims by the parents of only eight children. But most of them were lawyers' clients and members of campaign groups - countering assertions that the study was based on routine referrals - and Wakefield had been funded through an undisclosed deal to help them sue drug companies.

Read through Brian Deer's independant investigaion.

ACinMA's picture


You should really look into the serious conflict of interest of Brian Deer, before you make the mistake in thinking he is some sort of actual independent journalist..
Aside from that, maybe you should look into the continuing mounting evidence from many other health researchers, doctors and many others in the professional medical community around the world that have, independent from Wakefield, found evidence supporting all the claims he made..
Maybe you should read a few more of the posts on the site about this subject, you may have a change of thought..

Fall River, Bristol County, Massachusetts

"When one gets in bed with government,
one must expect the diseases it spreads."
‎"It's not like I'm a powerful person. My ideas are."

How do you spell "lies"?

You spell it:
and a myriad of other three letter words,
with the adjective "corruption"
and synonymous with "corrupt judicial system".

And never forget, “Humans, despite our artistic pretensions, our sophistication and many accomplishments, owe the fact of our existence to a six-inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains.”

ACinMA's picture

already posted

already posted LL


Fall River, Bristol County, Massachusetts

"When one gets in bed with government,
one must expect the diseases it spreads."
‎"It's not like I'm a powerful person. My ideas are."

s** happens

Sorry -- & I already posted my post on Twitter...sigh

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15