5 votes

Senator Harkin confirms why we need to abolish the IRS

I read this and i believe that everyone needs to see this information as it concerns every american. this information being brought forward is a senator's view of our country and how the laws are operated outside of our constitutions. before you read this watch this video of a old alaskan senator, and former governor confirming exactly what is being said here is about the system based on trusts. please enjoy this video and information being brought forward in this email. if you have any question I will try my best to answer if i can.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3J8vbtMxgWg

SENATOR HARKINS – IRS KNOWLEDGE
Although the IR Code is used as the basis for the so-called income tax, the personal income tax does not derive its authority from the 16th Amendment, Brushaber v. Union Pacific RR, or any other constitutional or federal provision, as those authorities fell with the loss of our national money standard in 1933. Since 1933, the people have formed a new unincorporated United States in trust by their silence in accepting the loss of their ability for paying their debts [i.e., extinguishing the obligation] at law [i.e., by the loss of a money based on substance]. In other words, the suspension of our national money standard created a void in the law. Consequently, a resulting or implied [constructive] trust rushed in to fill the void.
In a resulting or implied trust, there are no terms of how and who is to administer the terms of the trust. Therefore, you cannot put the blame on anyone besides the people for letting the trust be established. “The United States Government may be the trustee of a charitable trust,” Russell v. Allen, 107 U.S. 163: 27 L.Ed. 397, and further: The United States or a state has capacity to take and hold property upon a charitable trust, but in the absence of a statute otherwise providing, the charitable trust is unenforceable against the United States or a state.” In other words, the code does not define who is required to file and what the terms are, but when you use the IR Code as your argument, you admit to conveying your estate to the public trust. Thus, all your arguments have little or no merit. It then is a constant battle finding niches in the code which the IRS eventually overcomes, and it comes down to how much you owe and when you are going to pay. In the mean time, you cannot own anything because they put a lien on it, and it is hell getting rid of the lien.
Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution states: “New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.” Article IV, Sec. 3 clearly states that in order to establish new incorporated States under the Constitution, the legislatures and Congress must follow the Constitutional rules. But, since there is no prohibition under Article IV, Sec. 3 or any other provisions of the Constitution to prohibit the people from forming an association of new unincorporated states, and just since there is no charter of incorporation of the new states, and just what its duties are, i.e., its intents and purposes, a resulting implied charitable trust is formed by operation of law [see below for definitions].
You must also remember that you are also considered a beneficiary to the trust, and as such, unjust enrichment comes into play. As a result of [all] the foregoing, when you go into court, the judge constructs a trust whereby he takes judicial notice [of the presumption that you are a beneficiary of the trust and the presumption is the fact until rebutted with evidence] and invokes unjust enrichment on your part. Consequently there is no Constitutional Law, only the conscience of the masses in the trust governed by courts of equity whereby all property, real and personal, is held in common to everybody in the trust, i.e., every person re-insures each other’s debts and responsibility, in limited liability. In other words, by operation of law, the people have formed new unincorporated states that operate outside the Constitution under their right to contract and convey their property as a gift in trust, thereby creating relative rights instead of absolute rights. As stated earlier, being there is no charter of incorporation and just what its duties and jurisdiction consist of, this public trust of unincorporated states reverts back to the Articles of Confederation because, under the Articles, taxation and commerce were and are under the control of the states and outside the control of the federal Government. Thus, the IR Code is not under control of Congress’ general powers, but rather its authority lies under local law, which is the law [of the unincorporated] states under the Erie RR doctrine.
The Articles were in force from March 1781 to March 1789. They were never abolished, but discredited by 1786, thus not being [were not] incorporated into the Constitution. Most authorities of that time agree that, had it not been for the Articles of Confederation, our Constitutional Republic would not have survived. But taxation and commerce, being under control of the [unincorporated] states, created major problems as we are witnessing today under local law. Erie held that the law of the state shall apply in the absence of the Constitution or Acts of Congress. First, Erie does not say the incorporated State, but the unincorporated state. Second, Erie does not differentiate between foreign or domestic commerce, nor does it differentiate between local or general Acts of Congress. I go ballistic when I hear folks say that the incorporated States are what are doing-us-in. Go to your state constitution and check to see if the state boundary lines are there. “Oh!” you say, “they are not there.” Well, then, how can the incorporated State or States be doing-us-in when there are no boundary lines drawn between the various general powers over the people?—the U.S. Supreme Court has stated this many times over.
The purpose of the personal income tax is to tax those who want government acting under local law (public policy) to take care of them, which unfortunately is what most of the people want and expect, and therein lies the major problem. Anyhow, silence is consent. Therefore you are required to file tax returns and share your wealth with the undesirables. That is, unless you use the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 USC 1602-1611 (FSIA). FSIA was passed in 1976 in order to offer to those who are dissatisfied with public policy, a statutory remedy to the Constitution under Article III. Your access to the Constitution runs directly through the FSIA in every area when dealing with government: federal, state, or local.
In short, the FSIA codified the era of Swift v. Tyson, 16 Peters 1 (1842-1938) whereby a jury trial can now be demanded, if desired, in State court on any statutory issue covered by the FSIA against federal, state, or local government. Congress specifically stated that the FSIA must be interpreted by statutory remedy in an Article III court regardless of the citizenship of the plaintiff under international law outside of the realm of equity, Erie, Title 42 and other public policy. FSIA also, waives sovereign immunity for commercial activities of state and federal governments which consists of about 90% of government activity. In summation, arguing the Internal Revenue Code is an effort in futility.
End.
Resulting trusts
There are two main categories of resulting trust. In Re Vandervell's Trusts (No. 2) [1974] Ch. 269, Megarry J. distinguished between automatic and presumed resulting trusts, as follows:
"(a) The first class of cases is where the transfer to B is not made on any trust [formal trust indenture (document) creating an express trust] ... there is a rebuttable presumption that B holds on resulting trust for A. The question is not one of the automatic consequences of a dispositive failure by A, but one of presumption: the property has been carried to B, and from the absence of consideration and any presumption of advancement [towards formalizing an express trust], B is presumed not only to hold the entire interest on trust, but also to hold the beneficial interest for A absolutely. The presumption thus establishes both that B is to take on trust and also what that trust is. Such resulting trusts may be called "presumed resulting trusts".
(b) The second class of case is where the transfer to B is made on trusts which leave some or all of the beneficial interest undisposed of. Here B automatically holds on resulting trust for A to the extent that the beneficial interest has not been carried to him or others. The resulting trust here does not depend on any intentions or presumptions, but is the automatic consequence of A's failure to dispose of what is vested in him. Since ex hypothesis the transfer is on trust, the resulting trust does not establish the trust but merely carries back to A the beneficial interest that has not been disposed of. Such resulting trusts may be called "automatic resulting trusts".

LOWE v. STATE OF KANSAS, 163 U.S. 81 (1896) – And, in an information to enforce a charitable trust, a relator is required, who may be compelled, if the information is not maintained, to pay the costs. Attorney General v. Smart, 1 Ves. Sr. 72, and note; Attorney General v. Butler, 123 Mass. 304, 309.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Revoke the Trust called U.S. citizenship

The people were tricked into signing up for The New Deal, a government of unlimited powers.
The only real solution is to revoke the (communist) U.S. citizenship and transfer ones body and property back to a republic state.
Senator Harkin tells it like it is. If you don't like the New Deal collapse the U.S. citizenship and go back to the old deal!
Stop complaining. The fact your parents signed you up for a different citizenship from what you may want is correctable.
I am going through the process to close out my "trust account" called U.S. citizenship right now.
No more unlimited government "authority" over me.

The Oracle

TwelveOhOne's picture

How?

What process are you following? Thanks!

I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)

Non Resident Revenue

Im going back to non-resident alien status. That is our proper relationship to the foreign state UNITED STATES which is in fact it's own country within its own Washington D.C. Borders.

See Taking Control of Your Birth Certificate Trust on Sovereign Warriors. The basics are there.
There is more than one way to do it.

I joined a group that is using a foreign grantor trust and UCC-1 claim on the U.S. citizenship to claim and liquidate the U.S. citizenship. There are numerous groups doing this in The Crown colonies, United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia.

Search 1666 Ceste Que Vie Trust Act of Parliament, Declaratory Judgements Act of 1934 (reverses New Deal),
Secured Party Creditor Process.

1 So you can get some control over the U.S. citizenship through a Secured Party Creditor process.
2 Or you can do a Federal Declaratory Judgement (see Winston Shrout Declaratory Judgement on YouTube).
3 Or you can completely kill and liquidate the U.S. trust (citizenship) by the process shown on Sovereign Warriors.

I want my U.S. citizenship completely wiped out so I am using the total liquidation process and revenue to a foreign grantor trust. Remember Ohio is a foreign State to STATE OF OHIO! The first one is the Republic, the second one is the federal corporate commune (democracy).

Go to Sovereign Warriors or to Panterra/Gemstone University for details. There is also an article on DP about becoming the Administrator of your trust (U.S. citizenship), great info.

Either way you will have to do your due diligence but it's worth it to get the monkeys off your back!

The Oracle

TwelveOhOne's picture

Thanks!

Not sure I'm ready to take the leap but I'm glad to see that people are arranging it so that it is easier. The future has more liberty in it.

I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)

When the laws of man are ignored

the laws of the jungle take its place.

Regarding phrases like "no right", or "authority over me", these protections from the state are no longer upheld by bespectacled court authorities, but violently disregarded by people with badges and guns.

To imagine that something can be done, on paper, that will stop violent people from breaking laws already written, like renouncing citizenship or announcing personal sovereignty, or nullifying is to misunderstand the very nature of the thugs with badges and guns.

They may have no proper authority, according to the bespectacled scholars, but the Boston lockdown showed us, to paraphrase Mao, that "power grows from the barrel of a gun", and this is the extent of all law in the United States.

Author of Shades of Thomas Paine, a common sense blog with a Libertarian slant.

http://shadesofthomaspaine.blogexec.com

Also author of Stick it to the Man!

http://www.amazon.com/Stick-Man-Richard-Moyer/dp/1484036417

Fictions

The U.S. agents can only act on their fictions. This is why they ask for a government I.D. Showing the name of your membership (the ship is a fiction). No membership no jurisdiction. The police will not mess with anyone above their jurisdiction. First of all the charges brought by police are in dollars. So no contract = no contract violation = no dollars.
The STATE OF NEW YORK for example is simply a for profit business. It sells tickets and charges to its membership.
You don't get the record of the month from Columbia unless you have a membership contract with them requiring you to accept the records. You will not get tickets/charges/ taxes from the U.S. if you do not have a contract requiring you to accept those. U.S. citizenship is a commercial contract requiring you to pay any charges that you are presented with, no contract, no charges.
It is really that simple.
Obviously the thing to do if you don't want any more records is to cancel your record club membership.
The same applies to what one should do if he/she does not want to receive any more theater tickets/tax offers or charges from the UNITED STATES CORP, cancel the membership!
Of course you have to bring all your accounts with the UNITED STATES CORP current and follow the contract terms for cancellation.
Yes, even the dumbest cop knows he cannot sell a ticket to non "ticket club" members.
It is all paper, the guns are for show.

The Oracle

More on Trusts

Very interesting. So I guess

Very interesting. So I guess all the people in jail for failing to file, or filing fraudulent information are in jail for voluntary reasons.

I don't like the income tax any more than anyone else, but it is currently the law. When people buy into spurious arguments like this, they end up in jail.

We need to change the law, We need to educate the American people. But while it is the law, we have to follow it.

Bumping

For more time to read.

Sure seems interesting on the face of it.

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

Gymnastics. All of it. You contradicted yourself numerous

times.

Lay off the pipe.

It is much simpler than that.

We live in a police state.

They have guns, and they threaten to use them on you if you don't comply.

That's about it. The rest is mere window dressing.

Agreed

The elite are hiding personal gain and imposed injustice behind a wall of constructed sophistry.

This is a long read...

I'm gonna have to come back to this....

“The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had." - Eric Schmidt

Since this was done under the War Powers Act...

The act could be revoked or declared unconstitutional.

bump

to read later

Jackson County Georgia

War is an instrument entirely inefficient toward redressing wrong; and multiplies, instead of indemnifying losses.
Thomas Jefferson

BUMPed for liberty

THIS IS A MUST READ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wisdom is better than weapons of War.....

.

And that folks is why we want to abolish the irs.

State of Texas Has No Boundaries!

So you could "do business" within the State of Texas Trust from anywhere on Earth. This article is a great read for people who keep claiming "They are violating the constitution". No not really!

The Rhodesian group just tricked us into joining and creating a giant commune and they run it for "our benefit" supposedly.
The people created a whole new communist society under cover of the Social Security system.

What a mess!
When FDR said "no politician will ever be able to undo what I have done" , he was right!
Sorting this out will take years. This is the same mess that eastern European countries are trying to sort out. Nobody owns anything. Everything has been placed into the collective Public Trust.
How do we divide it up? How do we return the Land to it's rightful owners that it was unlawfully taken from by the communist's Society?
Right now The Rulers decide who gets what out of the Trust.
Obviously they decide they get 97% and the rest of us have to fight over what is left.
Do read this article.

The Oracle

thank you

for your response......

Wisdom is better than weapons of War.....

hmmmmm....

bump....

Wisdom is better than weapons of War.....

bumped for liberty

everyone needs to know this.....

Wisdom is better than weapons of War.....