I Love Paul, but what is the negative on Romney?
Submitted by jasoncin on Sat, 12/22/2007 - 23:55
I absolutely support and love Ron paul. With that said, I am concerned that no one is really attacking Romney. Is there something I am missing? I know he is a flip flopper, but I haven't heard attacks on him lately. I am afraid he may sneak in behind all the attacks on Huckabee and McCain.
What do you think?
»
Radio ads
Ron has started naming names in his radio ads and comparing records. But to outright attack someone is not his style and we don't generally do it here either except to note if they have attacked him..
ignorant of constitution too
ignorant of constitution
too entrenched in the money machine, corporate control of gov't = fascism
no grassroot support
typical politician playing the religious card with Pat robertson.
no 20+ years of voting record to vet
pro war
not a veteran so not fit to command an army to war. It's ok if he is for peace but he is not.
no underlying principle like RP has
do not understand our economic woes -- no clue coz he does not suffer the common people's woe.
First of all you have only been here for a short time
The more you hang here the more you will learn about Dr. Paul and the focus of our work.
We are pretty much single minded in this effort. I suggest you study Mitt somewhere else and stick to the Doc when you are here.
A general view would be this.
Mr Romney wants the war on terror to continue. This means that our young men and women will be in danger far away from home this Christmas.
The war on terror requires more money than we actually have so we borrow the money from China.
Mitt wants the federal reserve to continue printing money, thus debasing our currency and making our savings worth less.
These two brief views put Mr.Romney well to the right of the political center...ok? You still with me? Are you really reading this? I hope so.
Now since you love Dr. Paul so much you are blinded from knowledge of his political position I will tell you this once.
Dr.Paul will end the war, cut defense spending and stabilize the currency.
Quiz..........where does this put Dr. Paul in the political spectrum of today?
The center............right in the middle.
Dr. Paul is the MOST MODERATE of the candidates.
Mitt seems like a nice man. He is out on the right.
The doc is the best man because he is in the center.
If you want to attack Mitt, I suggest you FOLLOW THE EXAMPLE OF THE MAN YOU LOVE, DR.PAUL.
Say the truth over and over again. Mr. Romney will take care of himself without any help from us...Lord knows he has enough money. The doc has proven that negative campaigning does not work..so why start now?
From graph standpoint, Mitt hasn't peaked yet and might just be the man to beat at the convention...we will beat him...he is beatable and he WILL BE BEATEN. Now do solid research and post why you think Mitt can be beaten at the convention....we here, would love a post like that.
We want it more than they do...so we don't spend energy attacking other candidates and we beat them by telling the truth.
T
Unify
big issues for
big issues for me:
flip-flops almost as much as Hillary
not strong on the 2nd (supported the Brady Bill and the AWB)
supports amnesty for illegals
appointed very liberal judges in Mass
pro-war/pro-torture
supports the continuation of the war on drugs.
not as big for me, might matter to you:
pro-choice (a lot of evidence, including abortions being included as a "benefit" in the Mass heath care system)
for federal funding of stem-cell research
then there's the whole "I'd check with the lawyers" comment and the strapping his dog to the roof of his car thing.
in my view he's not as horrible as some of the others (Giuliani) but he's still a statist, big-government totalitarian, not a small-government conservative. Romney is more of the same, Ron Paul is Hope for America!
--
Son_Of_Liberty (formerly known as hippychimp...)
carpe libertatem
--
Son_Of_Liberty
twitter: @uptofreedom
comes down to who you trust
I'd vote Ron Paul first and then the Green Party candidate next. For me, I don't like the Republican Agenda but I'm willing to put my effort and money into Ron Paul to influence it significantly.
I forgave Bush and moved on because my life was more valuable than micromanaging him.
troll much?
You should do some research. Its not hard to find things about Romney that reveal his real agenda.
The revolution doesn't need to find dirt on anyone though.
http://montana4ronpaul.com/
this is very true. they have
this is very true. they have agendas and dirt and all that is the fire fueling those puppets downfall.
heres an attack you can send
heres an attack you can send off to some journalists... Mitt romney, if he were to hold his nose while speaking, would sound exactly like darth vader. If thats not evidence that hes on the darkside, i dont know what is!
When Romney answered the
When Romney answered the question about Bombing Iran with the answer that he would consult his attorneys before he did it........ well that answer speaks for it's self... the idiot does not know the Constitution and is not fit to be commander and chief.... "Consult his attorneys" what a total dipchit! talk about a howard dean moment!
“A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Prov. 22:3; 27:12 KJV)
Hey McCain-----┌П┐(◣_◢)┌П┐
You're absolutely right, I forgot about that!
I totally forgot about that. I wish that would come out more often in attacks on him. It was a kodak moment in hte debate!
Ron Paul for Freedom!!
Ron Paul for Freedom!!
The negative on Romney
is that he's not Ron Paul, not even close. Build up Ron and we won't have to worry about what tears down the others. -JP
The first 5 million supporters of Dr. Paul are 'early adopters.' The next 10 million will require a modified approach.