| |
  
|
||||||||||
Ron Paul vs. Tim Russert on Meet the Press
Submitted by DBlake on Sun, 12/23/2007 - 11:26
Was Tim Russert as fair to Ron Paul as he has been to the other US Presidential candidates? http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_vs_Tim_Russert_on... Thank you Tim .. Very professional job DIGG IT . » |
|
|||||||||
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
Biased and controlled...
I think that the good doctor did magnificent in light of the fact that Tim was somewhat controlling and limited Ron's responses. For example the question lumping together several issues, then attempting to not allow response to each, as each had there own merit, and thus needed clarification, which Dr. Paul didn't get response time. Also, if not for Dr. Paul's quick thinking, that question of running as a third party candidate would have lowered Dr. Paul's stature in this race.
Overall, it was great publicity, Tim was a bit antagonistic, but the good Dr. Paul clearly won this one, hitting the ball out of the park! I don't feel much need to thank Tim, as his hidden agenda's were revealed and then flushed down the toilet. It was simply an interview, Tim did his job, and Dr. Paul proved why he will be the next President of the united states.