78 votes

Ron Paul Slams Obama on Libya and the Constitution

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Obama's Constitutional law professors cap ?

What does the Supreme Court have to do with the generic Constitution ? Not a damn thing, it's an admiralty court for the UNITED STATES CORPORATION.
Visit the District Court of the US in the District of Columbia
it is an Article 3 Constitutional Court. Obama doesn't deal in generic Constitutional issues, he is the president of the US corporation and the bastardized constitution.

Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow

Obama thinks that someone else in another country

should step down, so that the people there can live their lives without fear ?? Who was it that proposed killing people on sight if they were suspected of having terrorist ties.
Seems people who bomb others with drones launched from hundreds or thousands of miles away might be considered terrorists ? The insane hypocrisy is just too much ??

Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow

Wise Man ...

Wise Man ...once said...

You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
Abraham Lincoln,
16th president of US (1809 - 1865)

Shame on YOU Obama, you poor excuse for humanity.
People ain't gonna be fooled anymore with your LIES and false hopes!!!

he was kinda incoherent on

he was kinda incoherent on the Gadafi response (kinda rambled), but otherwise I thought that was a great interview, especially the last part, "we're in the middle of a default"

RP getting some serious air-time!

This is what we've all been fighting for; more coverage, more debate, more common sense.....and the good Doctor is on point as usual! 3 years ago this type of interview would have been cut off after 15 seconds but now his message is so accurate that they have to listen and guess what- our side is growing exponentially!

Ron Paul vs Obama

That's what made this interview good.

I love the Good Dr and hope he can deliver quicker, more impactful messages.

Simple answers:

"No. President Obama is wrong. Unbelievable! He ought to read the Constitution if he want's real change" - boom! end response.


"Our message is taking hold, just look at my Republican challengers. They are just now, this year, saying what I've been saying for 40 years. You don't want someone like Mitt Romney who has his LAWYERS read the Constitution for him" BAMN!

Get in their face Dr. Paul! They set themselves up, for Gods Sake, for us all, KNOCK 'EM DOWN!!!

Excellent interview!

Wow, Ron is picking up some MAJOR steam on these interviews!

It absolutely BAFFLES me how people can hear clear, concise truth articulated like this and still go, "Eh, we'll just stay with the status quo." As someone coined the phrase years ago now..."Sheeple."

Wow flawless

This wasn't a homerun this was a grandslam.
He explained everything perfectly without getting too involved with terminology that many cannot understand but made logical replies that will make people think twice about the worn out ways this government uses propaganda.

I wish Ron Paul had pointed out that Dennis Kucinich...

introduced the Libyan legislation and more Democrats voted for it than Republicans.

I like at the beginning of

I like at the beginning of the video you can see Obama lie right to our faces on national tv. When speaking about the War Powers Act at 1:06 in the video he states "Do I think our actions in any way violate the War Powers Act?" He nods his head yes but states no. He is subconsciously telling the truth by nodding his head. I learned about this in a interview class and go figure Obama is a perfect example to see real examples of it.

If ever there were an IMPEACHABLE offense by any president....

THIS IS 100% TEXTBOOK IMPEACHABLE. Jhon Kerry says... He literally says that they didn't do it. So let me get this straight... Congress does not give the president the authority to initiate conflicts. And that means that the president CAN? Since when does it mean that if the congress doesn't carry out a presidents "request" when he gives it, then he has the full authority to violate that law? He says, the congress had the chance to authorize the conflict.... "and we didn't do it"..... Hey Jhon, your nothing but a war criminal like the president through your support of this.

He stated in his statement th reason that he shodln't have gone. He doesn't even get it, I sincerely believe that there is some kind of conspiracy here, and we just have weak congress men and women who are totally complicit.

Jhon said it himself... We didn't do the authorization.. so how in the world does that mean the opposite of what it means?! Th president can't do this! this is IMPEACHABLE


Obama "I don't even have to get to the CONSTITUTIONAL question."
(or vice verse)
The "I was just following orders" defense did NOT work at the NUREMBERG TRIALS on CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

RON PAUL 2012 or even sooner.

FYI U.S. Drones Strike Somalia, Or As We Can Now Call It, “War Number Five”

Link to share without negative title~


I want to be able to share this on my facebook for those who may need more convincing but without a negative slant. Ron Paul certainly slams down ome truth, but obama makes himself look a fool with no help from Dr. Paul.

AND this link takes them to RP's campaign site to learn more about him!

Please share and post this awesome video!!

Full Video without negative title?

I meant to ask if the Full Interview can be shared without negative title?? How do I do that? do I download and then repost to youtube??

do another search on YouTube

I did a search with the words "libya ron paul cnn john king" and the same video with different titles are listed so you could pick (of course watch it fully because some ppl add comments that are sometimes unnecessary).



Body language

If you pay attention at 1:11 into the video when Obama asks the question "do I think in our actions in any way violate the war powers resolution"? if you notice he nods yes quickly before he says no. This is his tell. His subconscious cannot stop him from revealing his lie.

-A former liberal for Ron Paul.

Good catch.

Very very good catch.


OMG ... that was 10 full minutes of rib cracking haymakers! That's my hero dealing the Ace in the hole which is talking points of devastating truth that can't be spun, in fact there is absolutely no escape. The candidate carousel at the RNC has given Dr. Paul a wedge in the media door, he is now taking full advantage and on the offensive ... nailed this interview with a railroad spike!

(never mind)

(never mind)

"Know what you know, know what you don't know, and understand and appreciate the distinction."


Poll on Obama and Libya needs help


it's about split now...

Check out http://iroots.org/
"If you’re into political activism, at least for Ron Paul if not for anyone else, I strongly recommend spending some time with iroots.org." - Tom Woods

voted and posted it at RPF


Integrity means having to say things that people don't want to hear & especially to say things that the regime doesnt want to hear -RonPaul

@ 8:08

Let's switch gears...you're making too much sense

Laughed so hard

Laughed so hard

Every Congress person ought to have to sit down

and listen to the wisdom of Ron Paul in this interview, and then be asked, where do you stand on this? The thing is, everybody knows Ron Paul is right, but for self promoting reasons (i.e. strongarm of the party) they have sold themselves out. How about every voting American watching this interview with Ron Paul, and then conducting one of the famous "scientific" polls on his approval. I'd wager his approval number would be about 90%. That's probably one of the big reasons the news media shuns Ron Paul interviews, he's so dead on right you really can't argue with him!

alan laney

Stronger Rebuke Needed

At 1:58, he says he thinks it's "sad" that President B.O. is ignoring the Constitution.

How about "treasonous", how about "dictator like", how about "criminal", how about "evil", how about "endangering to our national security", how about "lawless", how about "rogue criminality", how about "worthy of swift impeachment"?

It's much more than "sad."

Even when Ron said the comment was a "horrible statement", much more accurate and to the point would be "treasonous". Obama thinks he's above the law, and is testing how far he can go. Will the Congress allow this to continue?

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a rEVOLution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford

I think he was almost at a loss for words his reaction was so

strong. That is how it came across, not that he felt mildly about it.

Integrity means having to say things that people don't want to hear & especially to say things that the regime doesnt want to hear -RonPaul

wow, one of the best!

This is what the whole campaign should look like, RP vs Obama. No contest! Ron Paul is my president!


I don't know which puzzles me more,

the millions of people that voted for Obama, or why don't Americans embrace Ron Paul's clear arguments. You just can't have a clearer message than the good doctor's. If you don't get the message, then we're in bad, bad shape, and it appears that's the case.

alan laney

The gov't could say...

...Obama is Jesus Christ, and I think a good many people would believe it, maybe millions of people.

Indeed, we are in bad shape.

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a rEVOLution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford