Home » Forums » Videos

Ron Paul discussed on MSNBC (more lies)

Submitted by John.Boyer on Thu, 12/27/2007 - 01:21
in
0 votes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqv8AOVpGfw

did he really say it was revisionism?

serious? what paul said was an opinion, an interpretation of history of what COULD have been done. it has nothing to do with revising history.

how disheartening to see such a blatant attempt to discredit a candidate. did anyone else pick up on that lie? need to find out who that analyst was. disgusting.

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Most interesting

Submitted by gregoryrichards on Thu, 12/27/2007 - 01:48.

Why don't they debate Ron Paul on real issues, the issues facing our nation today, the merits of his policy, rather than his take on the merits of decisions made in 1860?

In any event, I wouldn't be to concerned.

Why?

Submitted by Jane Aitken on Thu, 12/27/2007 - 01:29.

Why are you promoting his name in the same sentence with this???

curious, why not? i'll

Submitted by John.Boyer on Thu, 12/27/2007 - 01:46.

curious, why not? i'll change it, but whats your reasoning?

-thanks