39 votes

Bill O'Reilly Slams Ron Paul; Cenk Responds

I don't agree with Cenk all the time, but he is very honest in his opinions. This is one video that I happen to agree with him 100% and I'm sure you will all too. Take a watch, it's interesting.

http://youtu.be/DwRYhKDpQgo

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'll ask again. Bill who?

Do the people who listen to Bill O for honest news really matter anymore?
I can't find one sane person who agrees with him on anything. He helps Ron Paul every time he opens his mouth. I think Bill thought Archie Bunker was dramatic role and never caught on it was a comedy. Real people don't think that way Bill. It's only TV. But you should know about that, or maybe not.
Taking pot shots at O'Reilly here on the Daily Paul is kinda fruitless. For starters I'm preaching to the choir and there will be no reasonable rebuttal by his followers. Considering they're so mentally drained for working a TV remote the chances they'll figure out a mouse and keyboard are slim to none.
Remember
Ron Paul says it all!

Oct '01 clip

In the video it shows a younger Dr Paul with oct. 24 2001 at the top.
I did not find it.
Link?

Old but smart

At 66 I guess folks can call me one of those old people.
So, I may be old but I am not stupid. I know Ron Paul is about the only chance we have left in this great country. I have known for awhile that O'Rielly is no more than a bully and a media mouth. Just for once I would like to see him eat his words. Young folks don't worry because we old folks are smarter than you may think. smile

I'm catching up

I'm 56 and happy to follow in your footsteps.
Ron Paul says it all. I know that age brings wisdom, but a child could see that Ron is right.
It hurts he is so right on the money about everything. Period.
Good men make good choices. Sticking to your guns and fighting for liberty regardless of others negative opinions show me the makings of a good man.
We all need someone to follow in these unfathomable times and his is the only strong and clear voice I here. So if your behind him, I got your back. And Bill who?

Ron Paul
Don't laugh, listen. Ya'll be amazed at what cha been missin.

Morris and O'Reilly:Charlie McCarthy and Mortimer Sneard of Fox

Dumb and Dummer...yuk, yuk, yuk...he heeeeee!

I used to love Bill...

... now I see him for the jacka$$ that he is.

Shame on you Bill.

Hey Bill....

maybe he doesn't come on your show because your an asshole. You and Dick toe sucking Morris. Bye the way we are going to crush Obama in the general election.

9/11 was an inside job .....time to get some answers..RP 2012

Ignore O'Reilly.

Cenk of TYT has already done a good job of answering O'Reilly. The best way to deal with O'Reilly is to ignore him. He is puffed-up ego-centric, rude and intrusive.

Dr.Paul is a decent man, popular, well-respected, and now very well-known. There is no need for O'Ry's platform to convey the message of Liberty. RP should Not lend himself to O'Reilly's rude style of interviewing. This is what a self-respecting man should do. Let DP members and RP supporters campaign to boycott O'Reilly, send messages to RP campaign staff. This will be great news, and it will have positive effect on the media. Put the bully in place, ignored = a bit smaller.

Ron's no Dummy

I imagine that Dr. Paul won't appear on the Factor because he knows that he won't get a word in edgewise just as Dick Morris couldn't talk on Peter Schiff's radio show the other day (and simply hung up ending the interview!). Dick probably won't accept another invitation from Peter just as Dr. Paul declined to be abused again by O'Reilly. I hope someone brings this simple observation to Morris'and O'Reilly's attention. Though Dr. Paul can debate with the best of them he is a gentleman of the first order and is what endears him to anyone with half a heart.

"It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged." G.K. Chesterton

What would RP say?

It's all very scary and yes good strategy. The fact that revolution could hit Libya shows that it is possible for revolution to hit any of the countries in this region, not just ones that don’t have the money to maintain their promises. In Egypt, there appears to be a possibility of an orderly transition to a new government, but this seems far less certain in Libya.

Libya’s oil exports amounted to about 1.5 million barrels a day in 2009, based on EIA data. The same source indicates that OPEC is to hold a special session in case of oil price soaring, and furthermore, that Saudi Arabia will make up for the shortfall in Libya’s exports (when and if).

One of the big lessons that may come out of this is that we really can’t count on OPEC as much as we had hoped. First, there is the problem of oil supply from individual countries, like Libya, being reduced, because of political problems. Second, OPEC’s ability to actually deal with disruptions may be less than advertised.

With the discovery of oil in 1959, the focus of U.S. interests changed as officials began to see Libya mostly as an inexpensive petrol pump. I guess, Libyan oil and gas reserves are of direct interest to the United States because they ease production pressures on our traditional suppliers.

Furthermore, I guess what we want are new investment opportunities to exist in areas like tourism and infrastructure development, but the current political and legal systems in place (none???} make it difficult for most U.S. companies, outside the energy sector, to pursue them.

All that being said, the USA is not the world police like so many are yammering about. We want control of the oil in the Arab countries, because we don't have any alternatives yet. We don't want China to take over and we don't want to be on the short end of the stick in terms of the coming oil/gas shortage.

So you can see that the confusion arises, when they take the next step. Listen to Trudy Rubin - excellent summary ---> http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/trudy-rubin/128344318.html . Oops! I guess O'Reilly was correct once again!

Let's all take a Cruise? http://feelnfly-feelnfly.blogspot.com/

Ha ha ha! o'rly...

Your and your butt plug morris are such baffoons!

You guys are the best!

Its like having my own personal armory...

Just had some flak on my FB about this whole O'Reilly thing. With my busy work schedule I couldn't reply . All I needed to do was come to the Daily Paul Armory!

For Freedom!
The World is my country, all mankind is my brethren, to do good is my religion.

SteveMT's picture

Although I generlly don't like Cenk, I like this.

He has gone up a notch after his willingness to do this. There is hope for him.

Bill O'reily is a hypocrite

Bill O'reily never even served in the military , yet he has no problem advocating sending countless youth to fight and die in endless and fruitless wars in the name of Israel . He is a typical coward and hypocrite .

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/2002/01/010702_Vietnam...

pass this on to as many people as you can in an effort to expose this fraud .

Those that advocate war should send their families first.

I think that would be a good law. Any congress member that votes for war, should serve in the war themselves, including all their family members, before anyone else.

We wouldn't have a single chicken hawk crying for war.

Hell Yeah!

I support that

For Freedom!
The World is my country, all mankind is my brethren, to do good is my religion.

you're a little overweight...

LOL

This won't hurt us one bit...O'Reilly sucks.

Anyone who supports the Neo-Con O'Reilly supports a flawed policy of poking a dog in the eye with a stick until it attacks you - then blaming it on the dog.

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

Maybe this would

Maybe this would work:

O'Reilly: Are you just gonna let Iran attack Israel?

Dr. Paul: When did Israel become our 51st state?

O'Reilly: gasp, sputter, You mean you'd just let them bomb Israel?

Dr. Paul: I wouldn't shed one drop of American blood for someone else's country. Israel has 30 nuclear warheads, Iran has none but if they had one they still couldn't attack Israel without assuring their own destruction whether we intervene or not. If you feel that strongly about defending other people's countries maybe you should do like George Orwell or Ernest Hemmingway did in the Spanish civil war and grab a gun and go over there yourself.

O'Reilly puts fingers in ears and stats changing U-S-A, U-S-A

Agree

And I think Paul should hammer home the point that Israel is more than capable of defending against an attack. Then he should ask Bill if he would volunteer to carry a rifle and go fight against Iran since he's such a war promoter. Then the U-S-A chants would get very loud!

Israel has 300 nukes I

Israel has 300 nukes I believe

you know, I think you're

you know, I think you're right. Not sure where to fact check that one though but I'm pretty sure you're right about that.

Samson Option - wiki.

most folks in the defense and intelligence community know the facts about Zion's nuclear policy. See wikipedia's "Samson Option", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option.

We saw the trailer on 911, recently the killings in Norway.

General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother." How and who will deal with this scary black-mail.

Ron Paul has said repeatedly that Israel has 200-300 nukes.

And is perfectly capable of defending themselves, if the US didn't keep getting in their way.

I believe the source of the 200-300 nukes is the CIA.

crazy

Bill O'Reilly "I've had Ron Paul on before and called him crazy".

And he wonders why Ron Paul does not want to come on his show?

Gandhi

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

Persistence and determination are alone omnipotent.
- Calvin Coolidge

O'Reilly Barks at his own Pope

O'Reilly lost my viewership long ago when he claimed to be a devout Catholic while publicly defying official Church teachings on tv. He openly supports abortion in certain circumstances, calls God "the Deity" like he is Hindu, and openly slammed Blessed John Paul II for telling us not to go to Iraq. I have no respect for him. He is a liar and he is obnoxious. He needs our prayers. There are many shows out there with high viewership that would give Dr Paul a boost like Chris Wallace. Wallace at least lets folks talk. O'Reilly is rude, egotistical and can't even respect the official teachings of his own religious leaders. He would never respect Dr Paul's answers.

Thomas M. Gallion

A ton of comments on that Utube already!

Mostly in favor of Ron Paul.

We are Winning!

What's this junk from Morris...

that 4 years of Ron Paul would be just like 4 more years of Obama. I couldn't imagine more polar opposites on almost every issue.