63 votes

Former 4-Star General Admits Neocon Coup in Middle East

I have been labeled a conspiracy theorist for about a decade because there has never been enough credible references sharing the truth about the neocon agenda to dismantle and takeover the middle east.

Until now.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

i just

watched this video for the first time and wow.. looks like he was right.

I like Wes Clark for this but

I like Wes Clark for this but this is the second video I've seen of him telling the story about the lead up to the Iraq invasion and in the first one I'm pretty sure he said it was Donald Rumsfeld telling him all this. Now, he is saying it was a high ranking Pentagon official. There is a big difference between Donald Rumsfeld and an unnamed Pentagon official. Something seems a little funny about that.

What are you talking about?

He did say Donald Rumsfeld. He said after 9/11 he went to the pentagon and saw Donald Rumsfeld. Watch the video starting at the 0:30 mark.

The General aludes to members of the CFR

The people that the Ret. General refers to in his speech that knew what the Agenda for the Middle East was long before it started to unfold are all CFR members. Ron Paul has spoken about the CFR and of course its relation to the Fed. Res. Aside from the books that Ron Paul has written to explain the Federal Reserve and Sound Money situation, the one book that is a must read and should be taught in every history class is one that Ron Paul himself, endorsed; “The Creature from Jekyll Island”, by G. Edward Griffin. It seems to me that if the voting population would take the time to read this very enlightening and interesting book about the CRIMINAL creation of the Federal Reserve, Ron Paul would be the clear and ONLY choice for President. He is the only candidate that has been bird-dogging this CRIME since he came into office. He is the only candidate that understands this CRIME which IS the root of all of America’s ills. The other candidates either don’t know this information or they aren’t willing to talk about it in public. Either way that would make them part of the problem. People would see that they have been tricked into wasting their time and energy playing the Republican/ Democrat game and that that game has been used to distract their eyes from who is really running the country. A group of elderly people I know have just finished reading the book and are now sickened and ashamed that this has happened to their country right underneath their noses. They feel that all of the votes that they have cast over the years have either been wasted or have helped a CRIMINAL cause that they didn’t even know existed. If you have read the book, read it again. If you have never read or even heard of this book, you have now, so get it, read it and pass it on so that you and others will have their eyes opened before the next election.

This was the opposition to RON PAUL in 2008 and why the Media tried so hard to ignore him then. They are the same organizations that own the Media and the Banks that are responsible this election season for trying so blatantly to suppress his momentum now

Zoom in Magnifies,

Gen.Clark's focus on 'them' is taken as neo-con. but that would be magnifying them tooo much, though they are involved in the coup - no doubt. let us add in-to the mix NATO, + Zion's Agenda. Clark was a General & Commander, spent many years in the military, then he suddenly 'discovers' a teeny meeeny bit on a huge canvas, called Earth. Wow.
Zoom out & get the bigger perspective.

Clark gave us some insight on the neoCon plans, but

isn't he calling the kettle black? He was the NATO Commander (Clinton admin) that initiated the Kosovo War, by siding with the KLA (trained by bin Laden aka CIA name John Osman) and Muslim Albanians, against the Yugoslav and Serbian Christians. This of course was initially instigated by the IMF and World Bank scams to cause political rife, which began back in Reagan's term. This conflict was a mirror to what's happening in Libya. They wanted to take down the legitimate government, to gain control of the Caspian Sea for an oil pipeline and gain control of the prosperous mineral assets of the region. If Clark would of brought this fraud up, he would have some credibility, but since he focused on Bush's administration he is playing partisan politics. As example with the Libyan invasion, the GOP gave a small wimper of disapproval, but as with Libya, only because it was a UN/NATO attack, and not lead by US military. Like Clinton, Obama is attempting to hide his aggression behind the UN/NATO, so they can't blame him for the atrocities being committed.
The question that should be made, is why isn't Faux News or the radio hacks tying these conflicts together as being the Democrat method. The reason being, their job is to keep the right behind military interventionism, and continue the left vs right BS game. If they were to press the Libyan conflict to hard by exposing the frauds, people might awaken to Dr Paul, which by all means they can't let it happen.

Just watched the Pat Tillman Documentary


I know too many good people who IF they knew the truth, they would make great allies in our fight for Liberty. The vast majority of the people are unwilling participants in this farce!

I am a little less kind for our good democrate brothers and sisters. They scream and holler at Bush (and well they should) but now that Obama is running the wars, all is well, even though they still don't like it.

Where, Oh WHERE is the Anti-war movement?

....where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is LIBERTY. 2 Corinthians 3:17(b)

***wants are unlimited, means are scarce...***

Clark is a CEO of a corporation that makes stealth bikes

his company makes magnetic wheels. I saw it on a science show at my friends' house about 7 years ago. I couldn't believe what I was seeing and tried to chase the TV show down buit never had any luck. Since I saw the program, my gripe with Clark is that he would rather sell his wheels to the defense contractors for big bucks than have it go public. He would be a good person for Ron Paul, but then I think to win it takes a wide spectrum of people, from the truther to the generals of defense department contracts and million in between...


makes your blood boil.

Why is this not being broadcast to the American people?

We should have Jon Stewart put Wesley Clark on his show. Jon Stewart has millions of viewers and a lot of political clout. Rumsfeld was on there, lying about not "selling" America on the Iraq war.

Talk about....

too little way too late. The guy does seem like a gem but only when compared to scum like McCaffery and Betrayus.

9/11 was an inside job .....time to get some answers..RP 2012

This is the big picture of US foreign policy

Can you imagine how many people in politics, the media, academia, etc. all think "we'd better hurry up and get the US to clean house in the middle east before someone gets big enough to stop us"?

Either that or perhaps (or more probably) a lot of powerful people are only moral when they can't get away with being immoral.

Still, a lot of decent people have been really fooled simply because they overestimate the morals of authority figures.

And I wish Clark give more information about this "coo" (how do you spell that?). Obviously, names would be good, but also just talking generally about how many are in this coo, how they got in control of so much (talk about holes in our system of sovereignty), the roles of authority organizations to pull this off, how to overthrow them.

BTW: It is possible that Clark is an inside job...giving a voice to our concerns, but no plan of action. The lack of a plan of action is the tell-tell sign of a planted voice.

Could he be a potential VP

Could he be a potential VP pick for Paul? I wonder what his economic and social policies look like.

I don't think his endorsement would hurt

If you read Clarks Bio, he is very qualified. On foreign policy he could support Ron Pauls position better than most any other person. The statement I hear alot is: I like RP, except for his foreign policy. This clearly shows the RP foreign policy is the best policy for our country.


No more Masons, Neocons, or puppets as a sugguestion to VP RP.

How do I know he's a mason, because nearly all of the officer corp, and even to make ranks like Sargeant Major, it is almost a requirement.

GARAUNTEEE!!! he is a high ranking one.

Freedom may be worth searching for.

I have given up on my fellow Americans, (not DPers) as I will not shed one more calorie trying to awaken anyone else who is not a critical thinker and does not have the inherent feeling that something is wrong.

just wow

just wow

Why is the General not leading now?

If he was sincere would he not be challanging the sitting president and advisors? He is still taking and executing orders. Did he mention his oath to uphold the Constitution? His mission is to perpetuate the Left-Right paradigm.

reedr3v's picture

Exactly. Why did he suppress the

information all these years and so many die? This shows what disgusting chickens all of the big military brass are, doing nothing but looking out for their own jobs and pensions.

I understand

I understand your point. But can you imagine him coming out with classified information and then gets blame and jail for revealing those information to the public? Man that would be the biggest leak ever if he came out and said it years ago. He should at least feel some guilt in this but he should learn to correct it by helping us now.

Three years prior to "waking up" (Big Thanks RP!), I kinda....

like this guy running for POTUS Dem primary to run against Dubya back in '04...till I lost my taste for him when he endorsed Kerry thereafter.

Guess there was some valid points in liking this guy then..

The question

that burns in my mind, is how can this General openly blow the whistle on a multiple country invasion, and this Bradley Manning "character" gets thrown in the brig for supposedly/allegedly releasing helicopter gunship footage,and or other documents?

Good Speech

That was a good speech in favor of non-interventionism in that region. Yet this guy did endorse Hillary Clinton for president in 2008. She would of been better than Obama, but I if this guy is such a non-interventionist why endorse Hillary (or anyone for that matter except maybe Kucinich) over Ron Paul.

Nobody gets to be a 4 Star,

or even a 1 Star, without being obedient to the Regime.

Kissing ass is exactly

how you get to be a four star. I saw it first hand.

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves." William Pitt in the House of Commons November 18, 1783
"I know major allies who fund them" Gen. Dempsey referring to ISIS

Yes, definitly, if you don't kiss up, you go nowhere.

A officer gets his career wrecked if he doesn't obey unlawful and immoral "orders", and instead goes by the rules. We saw that first hand.

The military is so corrupt, it's unbelievable.

This Guy is a Tool

I had to brief him a couple of times back when, during the Bosnia days. I wouldn't trust a damn thing this guy says or the motivs behind him speaking.

Yes, you're right.

There was no neocon coup in the Middle East.

The neocon coup happened when they did 9/11.

Do I hear an

Do I hear an endorsement for Ron Paul?


This guy cannot be trusted. If he did endorse Ron Paul it would just be an Establishment effort to be on the inside track of a Paul administration.

interesting to hear

Clark's personal narrative.

I have to say, though, with regard to his comment that a policy coup occurred and no one bothered to tell "us"...Brzezinski's The Grand Chessboard came out in the 90's and pretty much called the 2000s like a play by play.