28 votes

Barack Obama (c. 2007)"detention of American citizens as enemy combatants is unconstitutional."

Felt like digging up some good ol' fashioned hypocrisy. A Q&A with Boston.com has plenty of it. Here's some highlights:

"The detention of American citizens, without access to counsel, fair procedure, or pursuant to judicial authorization, as enemy combatants is unconstitutional."

However, KILLING them is fine. Just don't detain them.

"Warrantless surveillance of American citizens, in defiance of FISA, is unlawful and unconstitutional."

"The creation of military commissions, without congressional authorization, was unlawful (as the Supreme Court held) and a bad idea."

"I believe the Administration’s use of executive authority to over-classify information is a bad idea."

"I also reject the view, suggested in memoranda by the Department of Justice, that the President may do whatever he deems necessary to protect national security, and that he may torture people in defiance of congressional enactments. In my view, torture is unconstitutional, and certain enhanced interrogation techniques like “waterboarding” clearly constitute torture. And as noted, I reject the use of signing statements to make extreme and implausible claims of presidential authority."

"I reject the Bush Administration's claim that the President has plenary authority under the Constitution to detain U.S. citizens without charges as unlawful enemy combatants."

"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."

"It is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action."

"As for the specific question about bombing suspected nuclear sites, I recently introduced S.J. Res. 23, which states in part that “any offensive military action taken by the United States against Iran must be explicitly authorized by Congress.”"

"9. Do you agree or disagree ... that nothing in the Constitution confers an affirmative right to habeas corpus, separate from any statutory habeas rights Congress might grant or take away?

[Obama:]Disagree strongly."

I know, nothing new, but it's nice to be reminded that candidates make empty promises & convictions all the time.

There's plenty more:
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/specials/CandidateQ...




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

good find

it will come in handy in a few months, if things go as planned !

----------------------------
Dr.Ron Paul's 2002 Predictions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

Very good

Keep this stuff up. Thank you for your work and perseverance. (-:

Michael Nystrom's fists can punch through FUD.

It's sad, but you just did

It's sad, but you just did what the MSM is supposed to do but never will.

Columbus, Ohio

Hmmm!

What a coincidence, all the people in that picture are Collectivists...

Sigh, when will people learn?

That.....

must've been a different Barack Obama.

"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin

Maybe...

Maybe... it was Barry Soetoro instead? :p

Send the link to

Send the link to DrudgeReport.com

Good call

Doneski.