Interesting GOP Poll
Submitted by rustybuick on Tue, 09/04/2007 - 10:46
They don't list RP but they do list "none of the above" Guess who's winning.
»
Interesting GOP Poll
Submitted by rustybuick on Tue, 09/04/2007 - 10:46
They don't list RP but they do list "none of the above" Guess who's winning. » |
|
||||||||
Ron Paul actually won the first poll...
Ron Paul won the poll, but the people running this poll said it was spamming (never heard that before), so they started this one without Ron Paul's name.
that's my favorite! LOL
"We can't put Ron Paul's name in the poll, because if we do, the results won't be scientific!"
R
O
F
L
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Get active NOW to put Ron in the general election. ronpaul.meetup.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
What is begun in anger, ends in shame.
We still need a few more. Go
We still need a few more. Go vote.
Dr. None
I just voted. "Dr. None" is utterly destroying the named candidates. "Who is that masked man?" :)
'none' may be destoying
'none' may be destoying Fraud Thompson in your state but 'none' is still 200 points down on the national. check the top of the site it has state filters.
Both fields
When I voted, I had the State field on 'all' and the Referrer field on 'gopstrawpolls.com' (which was apparently the default). That was my mistake. You have to have 'all' selected in both fields.
I emailed a couple of people (the only Ron Paul supporters that I know) asking them to vote. I suggest everyone do the same. The Internet is Ron Paul country. We can't let Fred win an online poll!
250 more "none of the above"
250 more "none of the above" votes needed to lay waste to big head fred
We need 350 more votes
That site is very inaccurate, its easy to change the vote total - there is no way Fred Thompson is in the lead. They just have a couple people deleting their cookies and then revoting.
We need about 350 more votes
We need about 350 more votes to put us over the top
keep'em coming "none " has
keep'em coming "none " has Faster freddy cat on the the run
2 different sets of results?
I checked less than 1 min. apart. The first time I voted and got the results, the second time I just went to results page. Very curious..... ??? one is off the site... the other is blogosphere total....
Second look..... http://www.gopstrawpolls.com/pollresults.php
First Choice:
F. Thompson 2368 (25.8%)
(none) 1920 (20.9%)
Romney 1635 (17.8%)
Giuliani 1173 (12.8%)
Hunter 537 (5.9%)
Gingrich 514 (5.6%)
Huckabee 441 (4.8%)
Tancredo 356 (3.9%)
McCain 142 (1.5%)
Brownback 79 (0.9%)
Gilmore 4 (0%)
Candidate Acceptability:
Net Votes + Votes - Votes
Brownback -3995 -43.6% 1854 (20.2%) 5849 (63.8%)
Gingrich -336 -3.7% 3905 (42.6%) 4241 (46.3%)
Giuliani -684 -7.5% 3742 (40.8%) 4426 (48.3%)
Huckabee 74 +0.8% 3967 (43.3%) 3893 (42.5%)
Hunter -200 -2.2% 3752 (40.9%) 3952 (43.1%)
McCain -5677 -61.9% 1243 (13.6%) 6920 (75.5%)
Romney 925 +10.1% 4497 (49%) 3572 (39%)
Tancredo -1954 -21.3% 2877 (31.4%) 4831 (52.7%)
F. Thompson 1633 +17.8% 4733 (51.6%) 3100 (33.8%)
How many hours do you spend reading blogs?
1 to 5 2637 (28.8%)
6 to 10 2503 (27.3%)
11 to 15 1621 (17.7%)
20 or more 1159 (12.6%)
16 to 20 1042 (11.4%)
(none) 207 (2.3%)
On a scale of 1 to 5, how committed are you to your candidate?
5 3943 (43%)
4 2613 (28.5%)
3 1508 (16.4%)
1 464 (5.1%)
2 424 (4.6%)
(none) 217 (2.4%)
Conservatism from 1 to 10
8 2513 (27.4%)
9 2137 (23.3%)
10 1535 (16.7%)
7 1004 (10.9%)
6 679 (7.4%)
5 593 (6.5%)
(none) 212 (2.3%)
4 169 (1.8%)
-5 111 (1.2%)
3 86 (0.9%)
1 86 (0.9%)
2 44 (0.5%)
This was I looked at after I voted for none.. http://www.gopstrawpolls.com/pollresults.php?refer=gopstrawp...
First look .....
2096 ballots cast from gopstrawpolls.com (View Blogosphere-wide Results)
First Choice:
(none) 970 (46.3%)
Romney 616 (29.4%)
F. Thompson 172 (8.2%)
Huckabee 98 (4.7%)
Giuliani 83 (4%)
Gingrich 54 (2.6%)
Hunter 48 (2.3%)
Tancredo 35 (1.7%)
McCain 14 (0.7%)
Brownback 6 (0.3%)
Candidate Acceptability:
Net Votes + Votes - Votes
Brownback -1425 -68% 187 (8.9%) 1612 (76.9%)
Gingrich -965 -46% 440 (21%) 1405 (67%)
Giuliani -1052 -50.2% 407 (19.4%) 1459 (69.6%)
Huckabee -685 -32.7% 560 (26.7%) 1245 (59.4%)
Hunter -902 -43% 436 (20.8%) 1338 (63.8%)
McCain -1501 -71.6% 172 (8.2%) 1673 (79.8%)
Romney -421 -20.1% 705 (33.6%) 1126 (53.7%)
Tancredo -1168 -55.7% 305 (14.6%) 1473 (70.3%)
F. Thompson -889 -42.4% 463 (22.1%) 1352 (64.5%)
How many hours do you spend reading blogs?
1 to 5 786 (37.5%)
6 to 10 483 (23%)
11 to 15 323 (15.4%)
20 or more 239 (11.4%)
16 to 20 181 (8.6%)
(none) 84 (4%)
On a scale of 1 to 5, how committed are you to your candidate?
5 1469 (70.1%)
4 270 (12.9%)
3 138 (6.6%)
1 106 (5.1%)
(none) 75 (3.6%)
2 39 (1.9%)
Conservatism from 1 to 10
8 489 (23.3%)
10 448 (21.4%)
9 366 (17.5%)
7 230 (11%)
6 198 (9.4%)
5 152 (7.2%)
(none) 94 (4.5%)
4 38 (1.8%)
1 27 (1.3%)
3 24 (1.1%)
-5 22 (1%)
2 9 (0.4%)
Note: -5 are lefty trolls.
You may have looked at an
You may have looked at an individual state vs. the entire poll. It breaks it down.
'none' is no longer listed.
'none' is no longer listed. What craven fools!
Famous Quote from Justice William O. Douglas
"The Constitution is not neutral.
It was designed to take the government
off the backs of people."
Famous Quote from Justice William O. Douglas
"The Constitution is not neutral.
It was designed to take the government
off the backs of people."
None is in first again...
I voted not acceptable on the other canidates..... that is still a choice.... drive up their negatives.
It's not listed as "none"
It's not listed as "none" you have to "not" vote for everyone else
LOL... silly poll
None is winning big time now. These clueless yahoos are too funny.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Get active NOW to put Ron in the general election. ronpaul.meetup.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
What is begun in anger, ends in shame.
"None" is coming up in a strong second place
We've narrowed the gap considerably in the last hour. Go vote.
poll
I voted for none and e-mailed the guy who designed the poll.
Donna
I can get behind "none"
Go "none" - a little cross check with the candidates listed on the right-hand side of their page clearly tells us who "none" is.
LOL That's really funny.
LOL That's really funny. Doh! LOL
Just say Yes to Dr No