Professor Murray Sabrin on why Ron Paul is silenced by the media— because of the Federal Reserve
Submitted by JohnPhillipSousa on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 14:28in
I don't think this is a repost. If so just let me know. It's on YT too.
»
- Login to post comments
Keeping this fresh.
Excellent video; a must see.
http://www.libertymaven.com/wp-content/uploads/bostonwhois.jpg
Sabrin would have a position in a Ron Paul presidency
He gets it.
"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul
Can anyone find the video...
that is referenced in this about The Bernanke NOT answering a question by Dr. Paul?
I've searched and searched and cannot find it. Thanks.
How many trillions has been pumped into Israel?
Before Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, they funneled $400 billion in assets to Israel. Do you remember? It was in the news one day, and gone the next.
Eustace Clarence Mullins wrote an excellent book titled "Secrets of the Federal Reserve Bank". Even though he never, ever, mentioned the word "Jew", in 1955 a German Jewish judge ordered his book to be burned. Germany burned his books. Mullins exposed the goose that lays the golden egg. I read the book. If it wasn't for Mullins, there would be no book by Griffins titled "Creature of Jekyll Island", and there would be no book by Ron Paul called "End The Fed".
Are there any scientists on this forum who are knowledgeable about poisons? If so, we need to talk.
"I support the Declaration of Independence and I interpret the Constitution."
rp marketing material
this professor is articulate at a level at the average american can understand. unfortunately, rp often does not bring up fed reserve at right and right place and explain it so a high schooler can understand it as this professor just used in the video.
i have seen numerous comments all over the place on the need for rp to use wording that the average american can quickly understand. this video does a good job of doing that as well as the recent rand paul interview with the judge on lack of willpower by republicans.
can rp supporters do anything about having rp use less phd type wording and injecting the federal reeserve bank in debates and ads?
bd
I don't think knocking this conversation off the
fundamental need to educate people about the harm done by the Fed, into a conspiracy track -- true or not the mainstream voter is not going to do for it and it will alienate many -- is useful in any positive, real way. Historians will dig deeper and their reports will reflect the winners of this campaign. If the Fed remains dominant it will be portrayed as FDR still is in the mainstream, a savior from a many-year's depression that it will deepen and lengthen.
If the Fed falls in disgrace, much more scholarly work will emerge over the decades to follow. Jumping onto conspiracies too early limits your audience; mostly negative elements will jump there with you.
Well said
Jumping into that sort of thing too early will push people away. You have to remember that many people are just beginning to question the mainstream media for the very first time. That's a lot to digest all at once. Freeing oneself from the chains of media propaganda is a process and it takes a while. I remember feeling like the whole world was upside-down for weeks; I was miserable. Some people will push away and bury their head back in the sand, because it's just such an unpleasant feeling. I think we need to stay very top level with our talking points.
You always come up with good stuff YumYum
I am not aware of the $400 billion that you mentioned. Do you have a link?
You are absolutely right about Mullins. His fine research was plagiarized by many without proper acknowledgement. Some authors spun the work to create red herrings.
Regarding poisons, Mullins wrote "Death by Injection" that reveals much about what we are being subjected to now. The PTB just could not afford to have Mullins gain prominence or have his books become widely distributed.
END the FED before it ENDS US
Thank you! Here is a link
http://www.rense.com/general83/400.htm
I am really looking froward to reading "The New World Order" by Mullins.
I just started reading "The Curse of Canaan: A Demonology of History"
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/mullins_curse_of_cana...
"I support the Declaration of Independence and I interpret the Constitution."
Thanks for the link
Wow, this is startling news and something that should be investigated by any credible news agency.
You are going to find a few things in "The New World Order" that will offend the beliefs of many in this group. I don't want to say what they are but if and when you find them, I'd enjoy a discussion.
Larry
END the FED before it ENDS US
Excellent video.
Thanks for posting. There is one person that earned his degrees.
Murray misses some key points...
The reason that the U.S. dropped the international gold redemption option was because the U.S. was running out of gold. It was not by choice.
Why? Well here is the key that Murray neglects to mention...
While the privately owned Federal Reserve rents money to the U.S., we were backing it with Treasury gold. In 1933 the domestic redemption window was closed... because we were running out of gold.
Reasonable people should ask why the people of the U.S. were backing a private currency with gold in the first place. If we were solely backing the money, why didn't the U.S. solely issue the money?
BTW, nothing has changed, we solely back the Fed's money with our private and public property. And again, if the U.S. is solely backing the money, why aren't we issuing it instead of borrowing it?
END the FED before it ENDS US
In 2012, not only do we back the FED's money with.....
our public and private property/assets but with our current and future labor and the income taxes which we will pay on that labor. This unilateral agreement began just after the United States (Corporation) filed for bankruptcy in 1933. Remember the citizenry gold seizure per our Federal Government around this very time? The national debt which took a mere twenty years to accrue since the creation/implementation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913. Thus resulting in a bankruptcy in a mere 20 years due to these international banking interests calling in their loan. Knowing quite well that we as a nation were financially unable to pay back or pay off this debt/loan an arrangement/agreement was created on the part of our government with these very banking interests which essentially guaranteed our citizenry's current and future labor through the income derived through the Federal Income Tax(es). In addition, also guaranteed by our government to these banking interests is/will be future labor and the taxes paid on those by our children and eventually their children and eventually their children and grandchildren, etc. I believe you get the picture. For additional insight on this very subject, please Google- The Redemption Process. There is a wonderful letter circulating which was written by Colonel Edward Mandel House of the President Woodrow Wilson Administration which explains in detail this very subject matter. A wonderfully explicit explanation.
Dr, wasn't it around '33 when they confiscated privately owned
gold?
Bill Still whose just announced his candidacy for President -Libertarian Party-has asked and come up with an answer to your last question. And it's where he parts ways with RP. Wants the govt to print its own money, (would be interest free) pay the debt off, then end the Fed and/or its ability to conterfeit money.No borrowing, no national debt.
He's a big proponent of individual states having their own state banks a la N.Dakota. California just voted down the same thing. Surprise Surprise. I like his ideas. Wouldn't mind seeing him in Paul's admin. But he's singularly focused on monetary policy. In fact, I don't recall him addressing foreign policy.
http://still2012.com/
"If you want something you've never had before, you have to do something you've never done before." Debra Medina
FDR confiscated gold in 1933 for no reason
John; FDR confiscated gold at well below market value in 1933, then after taking receipt, he abandoned domestic redemption. If the U.S. was going off the gold standard, he didn't need to confiscate any gold. He screwed the people.
I'm interested in Bill Still but details are lacking in his plan. It will be interesting to see his plan.
State banks can be a dangerous affair as the state pension funds may be used to back private debt. This makes no sense and will result in theft.
END the FED before it ENDS US
excellent question, doctor...
maybe someday we can get an answer!
its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
Defeat CORKER! Bailed out the banks. In training to steal more.
Defeat ALEXANDER! Career traitor! Handsomely rich in a poor Nation.
Very true, but I went back and listened and I think he was
just giving a quick overview.
Also, kinda funny actually, at about 4:45 he answers his panel member's question on how would Paul stop the FED from debasing the currency. Replies,"Simple. He tells the Fed to stop printing money [sic]." That's so wrong I don't have room to go into it. But he confessed; he doesn't know what's within the President's powers to accomplish that.
But Paul does. So it's a mute point.
"If you want something you've never had before, you have to do something you've never done before." Debra Medina
Unsound money equals an unsound society
Because societies are based upon trade.
This guy is right on! The core of most the problems we are having is unsound money, or the banks counterfeiting, stealing value from the people and then using the counterfeit money to buy and consolidate resources, power, and control.
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
Beautiful find
I don't know how many times I have had similar conversations trying to make these points with people especially about electeds either being unqualified, corrupted, or forced not to speak about what REALLY is wrong with America!
Therefore there is no difference in party as none (except Dr Paul) have had the balls (pardon my bluntness Dr Paul) to stand up for the Oaths they take when entering office.
So I ask myself, what are they afraid of?
"If" they are afraid of the all-mighty powerful FED-elite, then we must take back our powers as a duty to make the elected and the all-mighty FED elite understand we ARE more powerful because we CAN rectify our Constitution. We DO have the power and no usurpation of our power by the patriot act or homeland security or (small "f") federal reserve can hold back a nation when it finally realizes...
The Fed Reserve isn't the only Corrupt Game in Town
Good post, freelea2... I personally believe RP is being ignored/derided because he BELONGS to NO CORPORATE LOBBY. And of course, that means he's Not for Sale. (Must drive Corporate Anything bonkers!) As WE know, he Does Belong to the PEOPLE. fed reserve may be ultimate CORRUPT CORPORATE?
In the meantime, seems to me every DAILY CRISIS to which We are being confronted leads back to the Globalist/NWO Agenda, and this current prez had the way paved by numerous adms and congressional delegations...
Someday ALL of us will realize that this Unbridled Government has morphed into a form that is entirely "Alien" - and no longer holds itself to a standard even remotely based on Our Constitution. Even if RP were elected tomorrow, we have to be "activated", just as you've written.
Susie 4 Liberty
So Right-
Sabrin is an immigrant (1949) from Poland. His personal loses in WWII were positively tragic. In fact the only reason he's alive is because his parents immigrated. Sabrin used to be Sabrinsky. The Open Letter below is truly inspired and inspiring.
This is why he's so outspoken and candid. The truth is on his side. And as you alluded to, no army can beat an idea whose time has come.
I think RP and Sobrin make a dynamic duo. He's got the same fire in his belly that I saw in RP's videos from early on.
I'm rolling around on my tongue the sound of President Paul and Vice President Sabrin to get a feel-LOL-why not?
"If you want something you've never had before, you have to do something you've never done before." Debra Medina
2007-Sabrin praises Ron Paul-good background info on both
Found this Open Letter on LRC.com. Better title I think would be: "In Praise of Ron Paul"
[RP and Sabrin go back to 1982! and are good friends]
http://www.lewrockwell.com/sabrin/sabrin10.html
"If you want something you've never had before, you have to do something you've never done before." Debra Medina
Debra Medina is a good woman...would have been good for Texas
And having mentioned Debra Medina's quote, I suppose you recall who/what dashed HER campaign for Governor...
Susie 4 Liberty
Glen Beck's question to her about believing 9/11 was
an inside job? I remember AJ was so furious at her for not coming out strongly for it. It was a set up tho. Not really an appropriate question for a guber. candidate. Actually, I didn't think she handled it so bad. Said she was for reopening the investigation based on the evidence she'd seen if I recall. Oh well, she's one smart, tough cookie.
Absolutely. She was the only choice for Texas. Too bad Perry didn't pull a crazy comedy routine during the campaign like he just did the other night. Ha!
Sure hopes Deb runs again.
"If you want something you've never had before, you have to do something you've never done before." Debra Medina
I'd love to have a transcript of this
He sounds like RP but names names and has a 'If you don't like it, tough' delivery. Bet his students like him.
"If you want something you've never had before, you have to do something you've never done before." Debra Medina
OMG.... just sent this one out to my family
Talk about a direct endorsement for the courage, knowledge and understanding of Ron Paul.
Thomas Jefferson: “Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever."
Viva La Revolucion!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmaTNf4YhEs
An excellent endorsement for
An excellent endorsement for Ron Paul. Just a question though, who is Professor Sabrin? With what institution is he affiliated? Sorry for my ignorance and I like his delivery.
Murray Sabrin ran for governor of NJ a few years back
on the libertarian ticket and is a professor at Ramapo College in Mahwah, NJ. He speaks very well; I agree with you.
shuleba-wiki him
His name just didn't ring a bell until I saw his numerous archives on Lew Rockwell.com— after seeing that connection, I'd bet Sabrin and RP are more than mere acquaintences. There was an air of familiarity about RP in the speech.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/sabrin/sabrin-arch.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Sabrin
"If you want something you've never had before, you have to do something you've never done before." Debra Medina
WOW! this is awsome
Thank you for posting this. I going to watch it again!