If the establishment is so anti-Ron-Paul, then why is he in the media at all?Submitted by tonym on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 21:52
Obviously there is significant bias against Ron Paul in the media. But, rather than waste their time minimizing his achievements or calling him names, why doesn't the mainstream media just flat out pretend he doesn't exist? I know they do SOMETIMES, by excluding his poll results and excluding him from debates in the past and such. But the fact is, he's solicited for interviews, in the debates, and is very much a recognized face in the media. So, what's their game plan in showing him at all? Please list some reasons.