1 vote

HuffPo: Senate Votes to Let Military Detain Americans Indefinitely

They take lying to extremes when they defend Obama over at Huffington Post:

WASHINGTON -- The Senate voted Tuesday to keep a controversial provision to let the military detain terrorism suspects on U.S. soil and hold them indefinitely without trial -- prompting White House officials to reissue a veto threat.

The measure, part of the massive National Defense Authorization Act, was also opposed by civil libertarians on the left and right. But 16 Democrats and an independent joined with Republicans to defeat an amendment by Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) that would have killed the provision, voting it down with 61 against, and 37 for it.

bold mine
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/29/senate-votes-to-let...

Quoting Glenn Greenwald:

Let’s be very clear, though, about what the “veto threat” is and is not. All things considered, I’m glad the White House is opposing this bill rather than supporting it. But, with a few exceptions, the objections raised by the White House are not grounded in substantive problems with these powers, but rather in the argument that such matters are for the Executive Branch, not the Congress, to decide.

In other words, the White House’s objections are grounded in broad theories of Executive Power. They are not arguing: it is wrong to deny accused criminals of a trial. Instead they insist: whether an accused Terrorist is put in military detention rather than civilian custody is for the President alone to decide. Over and over, the White House’s statement emphasizes Executive power as the basis for its objections to Levin/McCain.
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/congress_endorsing_military_...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

In case anyone wants to leave comments

at Huffington Post...they only have about 15,000 last I checked.