9 votes

*Fox News Poll* Paul Surges Up 4 Points in latest National Poll - Gingrich 36%, Romney 23%, Paul 12%, Perry 8%

Gingrich 36%, Romney 23%, Paul 12%, Perry 8%, Bachmann 5%, Santorum 4%, Huntsman 2%

See Poll Here http://www.foxnews.com/interactive/politics/2011/12/08/fox-n...




Like this article? Get DP delivered to your inbox daily. Subscribe here:

E-mail address:  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

All polls reported by mainstream media are propaganda

Because the mainstream media is the propaganda arm of the establishment.

Newt Gingrich is a complete illusion created by the media; portraying him as going from the bottom to the top in weeks. It's all a lie. The poll is a fabrication.

How sickening it is when you know what is going on.

Skewed no doubt towards Fox's latest flavor of the week

Despite it being winter, current flavor Gingrich is going to start melting like an ice cream cone in the Texas summertime. And they have pretty much run out of other flavors.

It's going to come down to Paul versus Romney - and Romney has gone nowhere but backwards while our guy keeps steadily marching upwards.

Check out my new site to help promote and fund Ron Paul: http://www.bestronpaulvideos.net/

There is no way in hell Gingrich has 36 Percent.

Don't buy into this stuff, we have watched them manipulate the public with manufactured polls and media favoritism for over 4 years!

We were told all through 2007 that Guiliani was the clear front runner with 20+ percent, and when the primaries came around he finished almost dead last in every state he participated in, before dropping out early.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com


"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

I agree...

The media lies CONSTANTLY. Why should we believe them on this?

We'll never really know til the votes are cast.

Well, even then we won't know. Lyin', cheatin' bastards.

It wouldn't surprise me

It wouldn't surprise me in the least if they basically just made up the numbers to suit their purposes as they go along. If so, why would they give Paul anything? Well, as in all things, they can't lie TOO blatantly or the people will realize they're lying. If everybody's walking around seeing Paul supporters in a 20:1 ratio against all others combined, they can't give him 1% in the (fake) polls now can they?

If they are fake, then Paul's 12% is the minimum that some expert has decided most people will find plausible, without questioning the veracity of the polls. And the inverse with Newt.

A little bit more and Ron

A little bit more and Ron breaks the trend line ! Of course one should be skeptical of pills but it means something none the less.

The also did two Obama v. Romney & Gingrich but no Obama v. Paul.I smell fear but it's still getting to me ><.

"Give me Liberty or give me death." Patrick Henry

that seems low

hes gotta be at least 15 i think.

3rd place/12% nationally right now is AWSOME!!!

Despite the media blackout he has moved from 8% to 12%. That's huge, folks, it really is.

He's in 3rd place, NATIONALLY, four weeks before Iowa.

Where is the ideal place to be 4 weeks before Iowa? 2nd place in Iowa, and 3rd nationally sounds about perfect to me.

Gingrich might very well implode before Iowa, or even if he doesn't, Ron Paul's growth in support in Iowa very well might start accelerating. Either way he has a great chance to win Iowa, and more and more pundits are starting to recognize and say this.

But doing well in Iowa will lead to doing well in New Hampshire, and that is exactly what will bring him the attention, and taking-seriousness, required for his national numbers to start climbing at a much faster rate.

Just wait.


"Know what you know, know what you don't know, and understand and appreciate the distinction."

Minarchism
track

emalvini's picture

I'm not that enthusiastic about polls...

The first and meaningful poll will be taken on January 3rd in Iowa..followed by the next one on January 10..

In my mind, polls are generated for the most part by the bought and paid for corporate interests which are designed to steer (brainwash) voters toward a desired establishment, bought and paid for candidate, such as Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry.

Who is to say how accurate these polls are anyway. We don't even know how the questions were asked or structured.
For example, if Most of Newts support comes from aged voters over 65 years of age and that demographic is 37% for Newt, then you could say Gingrich is polling at 37%, even though that is for one specific age category or voting demographic.
In the same way, if Ron Paul is polling 12% for that same demographic, (65 -?)then that is what is posted on TV as his actual polling number. The public really doesn't know the who what where why and how of these polls. As far as I am concerned, you could just make up desired numbers for any given poll and make them come true by using rigged voting machines on the day of the election..

Exit polls are frequently taken just prior to a given election. That to me is a much better way to gauge the real outcome of any given election.

Bottom line here is work hard for you man or woman, have fun doing it and assume nothing and hope that when the caucuses and primaries begin all your hard work was not done in vain.

If

its not "likely Registered Republican" voters, or democrats, or indies - then it doesn't amount to a hill of beans.

Plus its from slant master FoxNews.

Not even legit. Nowhere near credible.

"It does not take a majority to prevail but rather an irate, tireless minority keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men."

--Samuel Adams

bigmikedude's picture

Being FOX's poll, that translates to:

"Ron has taken the lead."

8)

yeah buddy!