Sick of the term "Isolationist?"...I sure am!Submitted by LibertyBleeds on Mon, 12/12/2011 - 03:19
I read this article "Ron Paul, Spoiler" by George F. Will, [I do not know what the "F." stands for but I have some ideas]and just had to say something.
Here is the comment that I posted at the "Washington Post"...
I am so sick of pundits referring to Ron Paul's ideology as "isolationism!"
There is a HUGE difference between an isolationist and and a non-interventionist.
Ron Paul is a "non-interventionist."
Non-interventionism is the ANTITHESIS of isolationism!
Obviously George F. Will is a paid "SHILL" for the "ESTABLISHMENT!"
His job is to, try and destroy any candidates credibility, who rebukes the "status quo."
The better Ron Paul does, the more the attacks will increase. Mark my words.
If you feel inclined to learn something continue reading...
>>> Borrowed from "Wikipedia."
Non-interventionism, the diplomatic policy whereby a nation seeks to avoid alliances with other nations in order to avoid being drawn into wars not related to direct territorial self-defense, has had a long history in the United States. It is a form of "realism".
Non-interventionism on the part of the United States over the course of its foreign policy, is more of a want to aggressively protect the United States' interests than a want to shun the rest of the world.
Non-intervention, sometimes referred to as military non-interventionism, seems to some to be the antithesis of isolationism.
Participating in global economic affairs would likely boost trade and expand US diplomacy.
GET IT? GOT IT? GOOD!
I believe that Americans are tired of all the WARS and LIES.
Ron Paul has been speaking TRUTH to POWER for 35 years.
It is time for this Great Nation to Change Course!
Please do the right thing...
Vote for PEACE, LIBERTY and PROSPERITY.
Vote for RON PAUL 2012
Feel "free" to comment...