Ron Paul Wins Again! Bachmann lied (again!) about Iran in debate.

http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/12/16/fact-check-is-iran-wit...

Points out that Bachmann was "false" on the exact same thing IN NOVEMBER and still repeated it. She admitted in the debate that she looks at politifact (or at least her staff points out when she's correct against someone else).

Michele isn't lying on purpose. She honestly believes Iran has threatened to nuke the US. If she's willing to say that multiple times on national television, she'd probably be willing to start a war based on similar false intelligence. That's why, at the very least, the Congress should openly debate such things before declaring war with a roll call vote.

If both Ron and Michele were telling the truth during the debate, it might not be clear who won that exchange last night. Sadly, many people watching will assume they were both honest. Given that Bachmann is basing her aggressive stance on false assumptions, it's clear that Ron won that portion of the debate. Now watch the complacent broadcast media ignore Ron yet again and not mention Michele's dangerous misstatements.

Trying to go to war under false pretenses? That's so 2003.

Shame on her. We're talking about real lives here not toy soldiers. So irresponsible.

The stupid persons candidate of choice.

Ron Paul describes this phenomenon better than I can. It just WAR PROPAGANDA. Remember the "Weapons of Mass Destruction"? It the latest reason that we need to bomb and attack someone.

By now we should be used to the lies: Y2K, "Global Warming", the "Hole" in the ozone layer, and on and on.

When Bachmann perpetuates war propaganda that is a lie, SHE IS LYING!!!!!!!

It is irresponsible and dangerous for Bachmann or Santorum to make the claim that the current leadership in Iran is exactly the same thing as the leadership in Iran 25 years ago. Sadly, those who support them believe them as do many of those who support Romney, Gingrich, & Perry.

The myth that Ahmadinejad has expressed a direct military threat toward Israel stems from false associations to Amadinejad’s professorial readings to students of the published words of the Ayatollah Khomeini in a historical context within an lecture on the topic of the Islamic Revolution at an institution of higher learning. All Dr. Ahmadinejad ever did was lecture to students regarding the mindset surrounding a time in history those kids were too young to remember.

The warmongers have distorted this fact to instead mean that words spoken 25 years ago by another man are in fact the same thing as the current President of Iran’s views and mindset today.

Just last night, Sean Hannity made the claim during his interview with Dr. Paul(without giving Paul sufficient time to correct the host) that Ahmadinejad is a ‘Holocaust Denier’. Of course, such a claim even if true, would not by any stretch justify going to war yet this claim itself is also baseless.

When Andrea Mitchell (Mrs. Alan Greenspan) of NBC News interviewed Dr. Ahmadinejad, and asked him about his perspective on the holocaust this rumor was then started simply because Andrea Mitchell was given by President Ahmadinejad, a perspective which did not agree with her own and she herself irrationally took that opportunity to imply that Ahmadinejad was denying that 6 million Jews died during WWII.

Dr. Ahmadinejad did nothing of the sort but Mrs. Greenspan simply did not care for his tone when he correctly pointed out that not just 6 million Jews were caused to die during WWII but in fact 60 million people were caused to die during WWII and that war itself is a bad thing and should be avoided.

Mrs. Greenspan again asked him for his sympathy for the deaths of 6 million Jews and Ahmadinejad then pointed out that 34 million non-Jewish civilians were also caused to die during WWII and none of their descendants were awarded an entire country as compensation for those deaths at the expense of land belonging to people who were not at all responsible for anything to do with the original conflict or the deaths of Jews thousands of miles away in Europe.

Andrea Mitchell might not have liked the tone of that answer but such a statement is not by any means a denial of the Jewish Holocaust and certainly not a justification for The US removing the current regime in Iran.

Bachmann with the Nuclear Football is a scary thought. The nuclear button in her hands would result in the end of mankind as we know it today. She will say anything or do any thing to get elected, that includes bombing any country Israel's leaders do not like. A vote for any of the establishment candidates is a vote for war with Iran and a destruction of our economy.

The campaign seriously needs to take these articles - I also saw one on MSNBC : http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45694263#.TutejNRSSLI - GET THESE OUT. I honestly thought that last night during the debate, that Michelle got the better of Paul. After reading this however, it TOTALLY changes the way I looked at last nights debate.

I have heard them say these quotes SO MUCH - that I took them as fact. If the campaign doesn't do it - some video creator on here should

Why is this same "truth-o-meter" result not in the Ron Paul column as true? When he's the one to say she's incorrect, shouldn't he get a True result?

"there is no tranlation in the persian language for 'whipe off the face of the earth"

Looks like Achmadinejad has a "chip on his shoulder"

A chip? on his shoulder? lol

I'm cracking myself up :p

I guess I will have to double my planned donation to the Ron Paul 2012 campaign!