148 votes

Videos: Ron Paul Sunday Jan. 1, 2012, 9am - Three (3!) Interviews: ABC, CNN & FOX!

Thanks to SaveOurSovereignty(3) for the videos:







Update: Dr. Paul will be in three places at once!

Check local listings for stations in your area.

Live Streams: http://tvpc.com/ChannelList.php


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

CNN just said

that up until now Ron Paul hadn't undergone front-runner treatment in a debate, so we haven't really heard him, so to speak, but that "he'll be getting that treatment in the next debate in New Hampshire."

We don't want to miss it.

Check Out the Set on Fox News- fake background

He was at home in his office for all 3 interviews. They didn't want to show the good doctor looking presidential.

What a bunch of sleeze. I'm still reeling over CPAC, switching audio, planting mics around...
I used to hang on every word that came out of fox, holding out for some hope, but they burn you everytime.

All these media whores are complicit while Amerika is being dimantled. Drugs, guns, detainment, grand theft, deliberate destruction of the economy They're running cover for all of these criminals.
My only satisfaction is that these useful idiots incorrectly think they're going to be rewarded down the road. No sirs, no ma'ams.. you're "getting yours now". This will be your undoing. As for your seditious behavior and betrayal... you will someday in one way or another have to awnser for that. Life is a test and you're not doing so well in the game of life

Did you notice the terrible distorted audio on CNN & ABC?

But only for Ron Paul's voice?

Nice catch Queen of Liberty

I missed the background.

"Life is a test and you're not doing so well in the game of life." Sweet!

Not 3 interviews, but rather 3 doses of propaganda

These propagandists are domestic enemies of our Constitution.

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

HOLD the Presses! Just watched all of them again,

for the 3rd time.

He dictated his own agenda, despite the loaded questions. He stayed on point.

The Doc ABSOLUTELY P0WnZd all three interviews.

I think my initial response & my own, and apparently some of my own fellow R3VOL's, anxiousness may be getting the best of our eagerness.

Verdict: Ron Paul WINS!

He absolutely kicked ass.

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

I can't stand to watch Chris Wallace for one reason.....

He does the traditional Fox "ask and cut off" also known on the Daily Paul as the "excuse me sir" method. For as obnoxious as the guy from ABC was and CNN's repeating out the newsletter junk, they both let Dr Paul defend his position. Even the ABC guy let Ron respond when he yelld nonsense at the staffer's claims about 9/11. Wallace cut Ron off on almost every response and then claimed "but we have to move along to give more time to the other candidates." Yes Chris, we need more time so Michelle my belle Bachmann can give us proof of the bribing. Does anyone know if Michelle even provided proof?

Thomas M. Gallion

ABC guy would fit right at National Enquirer

The country is in the biggest pickle it's been in since the Civil War, at least, and these "journalists" can think of nothing better to do than waste time baiting and drilling on, comparatively, trivial - if not nonsensical - issues? That ABC clown took the cake ... every one of his questions had a lead in which was, as another poster said, all modeled on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" rhetoric.

I think Dr. Paul did very well. He keeps getting stronger in his skills at circumlocuting the mine-fields. It is a shame the journalists aren't getting much better at doing real journalism on the really important question of national bankruptcy and federal corruption.

P.S. Dr. Paul seemed to be incredibly tired and suffering with a cold? I can scarcely imagine carrying his responsibility and schedule. He is my hero and even in situations such as these he shows me where I can be better in the New Year....

Bill of Rights /Amendment X: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Do you need a politician or judge to "interpret" those 28

A question to all at the

A question to all at the Caucuses: When did we stop using our Dilomats to resolve disputes? Every establishment candidate has made it crystal clear they will attack and bomb Iran if they are elected. I doubt most of what they promise but I take them for their word on this. An attack on Iran will result in many lives lost plus it will result in Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz shutting off much of the world's oil supply. The world economy is in peril, including the United States. Do we really want to support someone that advocates a disaster of biblical proportions?

Did i just watch the same

Did i just watch the same interview three times?

Debbie's picture




I have something for you that will lift your spirits

This video will make your day:

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

I'm sick and tired of the

"Have you stop beating your wife?" questions!!
Here's some breaking new for ya' mainstream media, it doesn't matter if RP gets 1st or 2nd or whatever in IA because WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY!!! When super Tuesday comes in March and all the wannabes have fallen by the wayside and RP is still standing tall against flip-flopper mitt then what are you gonna do, squawk about "the newsletters! the newsletters!" Well too bad that dog won't bark anymore and then we'll put to rest all of the crap about "electability" and w/e bs you try to peddle... HA HA It's great to be on the winning side no matter what!!

3 bad interviews

They should be asking about the real issues people care about and not about what Gingrich says about Paul or about the fabricated stuff related to the news letters.

Debbie's picture

You don't understand, they have an agenda, why do you think they

all ask the same scripted questions and try to put words in RP's mouth? Fortunately he is onto all of that and is way smarter than they are, so they can't "get him" and I think that makes him even more popular.



One idea might be to focus on the "Media quotes, including their own Governor discrediting ALL IOWAN VOTERS!!"

Then, have your quotes of the following ready to read:

CHRIS WALLACE~~Ron Paul winning "will discredit the Iowa caucuses!"

RACHEL MADDOW~~Ron Paul winning "does not matter very much & makes it irrelevant & that it makes it more corrupt & that the results would mean...roughly...nothing!"

ED ROLLINS~~said on RP winning that "Iowa doesn't matter!"

CHRIS MATTHEWS~~on RP winning "If they do that, I think Iowa may lose its power politically if they do that this time!"

BEN WHITE~~"Maybe Ron Paul wins Iowa, but who cares!"

JUDITH MILLER FoxNews~~said, "If Iowa took him seriously, & Iowans took him seriosuly, maybe we shouldn't take Iowa all that seriously".

And, finally one last pundit comment:

"If RP wins Iowa, we just "take it out"....???" Need I say more.

Use these quotes for your CONCLUDING REMARKS! Plus,you can add: Why is the Media doing this? Because they represent the BIG BANKING INTERESTS & they're trying to get you to vote for THEIR ORDAINED CANDIDATE rather than for you to vote for the candidate YOU feel is best for the PEOPLE, not the banking interests which got us in this mess. In conclusion, I have one thing to say to my fellow Americans~Have you had enough?!

Or, you can say some variation of the above. Hope this helps!! :)

Get over it~~the interviews are done!

And, 90% of all Ron Pauler's were happy with Dr. Paul's responses, given the vitriolic hatred spewed forth the size of a 44 magnum!

If we don't have or can't edit the TV AD I mentioned below with the "DISCREDITED" IOWAN VOTERS, then, I would repeat the DOG ECONOMIC TV AD, as ~~

Iowans don't give a crap about these other issues. They know they can trust Ron Paul with his record. Iowans want somebody who can pull us through this ECONOMIC MESS, NOT increase BIG GOVERNMENT like Mitt RUMMY!

DO THE DOG TV AD!! over & over & over again & again MONDAY

Bob Chapman: "Ron Paul Polling at 50% or higher in Iowa"

The state GOP of Iowa know that this true so they have now decided to count the ballot in secret. This is the only way they can destroy him is to cheat him out of a win..

Can you imagine Ron Paul polling at or over 50% in Iowa now. The MSM is obviously suppressing this fact..

Remeber, Bob Chapman was a former Army Intelligence officer in the 1950's and he has reliable contacts in Iowa confirming a Ron Paul landslide..

Does any other candidate have

Does any other candidate have to go through an assault like this? Jeez, that was crazy, but I guess we have to expect this because Ron is going against the status quo machine.

Debbie's picture




From here..

..I watched these three interviews and walked away feeling like they were some of the best. I didn't feel like FOX or CNN was really engaging in demagoguery or yellow journalism. Even when the CBS tool started to, Paul handled it perfectly! He displayed that tone of strength that I feel has been hiding behind Paul's intellectual passivity.

It's that respect that he's not capable of reigning in that allows "journalist" to spurt nonsensical lies ad nauseam that puts him on the defensive and makes him look terrible.

I've been afraid that if people don't believe he's a racist homophobe then they'll view him as weak for allowing the inane questioning to go on.

These made my day. I hope he continues to handle himself so well.

I ask you this however,

why are these irrelevant topics even being discussed? After 30 years and hundreds of interviews with these same fools, nothing has changed. They already know he is a person of character and the answers to all of their ridiculous questions. These interviews are strategic to try and destroy a good man. Everyone one of them should be ashamed for not standing up with a spine and telling the truth. They all want to keep their jobs pimping the military industrial complex, which oh by the way owns all the MSM. The only issues that should be discussed are the almost overwhelming challenges to the future of our entire species on this planet and the fact that Dr. Paul has solutions how to restore prosperity and actually live in peace as human beings. It is astoundingly ignorant and childish of them to have someone as brilliant as Ron sitting in their presence and these are the topics they bring up? They have someone that can change the course of history and be the conduit to facilitate this happening and they waste everyone's precious time. Everyone go back to American Idol, Survivor and your football games, nothing to learn here.


because the global elitists

because the global elitists most threatened by Ron Paul own the media.

so these so-called "journalists" have to do as they are told, no matter what they think personally.

I wish just ONE of them would say "i'm not doing this anymore" and change the whole interview at the last second.
But that won't happen bc even if they did that in a live interview, in just seconds they'd cut to commercial & the interviewer would lose their job.

Working for US policy in the mideast that serves AMERICA's interests http://www.councilforthenationalinterest.org/

I agree. The MSM is

I agree. The MSM is undoubtedly against Paul. It's evident in their continued berating of his character regarding racism and homophobia. It's as apparent in what they DO report as it is in what the DON'T report. And it's infuriating.

The point though was that Paul took charge of the situation when the CBS clown brought up the ex-aid and his lies. And it was really impressive.

My fear is that if he doesn't shut them down BEFORE they have a chance to go on spewing lies and presenting it as their "journalistic duties" he will be viewed as weak and lose the argument by default.

Excellent job

Ron Paul doesn't hide, he addresses the issues straight on.

Personally I'd prob punch these jerks for their rude and offensive questions, interuptions and implications.

Ron Paul is superb because he knows what he believes. He is not hiding, he is not second guessing himself, he is not just vomiting a talking point.

Ron Paul is the real deal and it may take a while for that to sink in, but once people get it they are not prone to the latest sound bite.

Excellent job

Ron Paul doesn't hide, he addresses the issues straight on.

Personally I'd prob punch these jerks for their rude and offensive questions, interuptions and implications.

Ron Paul is superb because he knows what he believes. He is not hiding, he is not second guessing himself, he is not just vomiting a talking point.

Ron Paul is the real deal and it may take a while for that to sink in, but once people get it they are not prone to the latest sound bite.

I watched the interviews

I watched the interviews again and he did good.. There were no bombshells. as you can see form the news following...

If you disagree with me on anything you are not a real libertarian...

you know, I too have the same response on 2nd viewing.

call it overzealous & built in pro-bias, but whenever I watch the Doc on any MSM interview, I always want to throw something at the TV!

call it pent up questions that I would've loved to have asked or answers not being posed, to shoddy 'journalism,' or feeling like the Doc should've answered it in a, b, or c manner, or whatever. then, I watch it again: it's NEVER as bad, nor frustrating as my first reaction.

my only qualm is, we're his supporters and respond this way. so, just think how strangers, or an uncommitted potential voter would respond when watching his interviews.

experience has shown that my personal initial impression IS usually how others respond as well. and because I cannot be completely be objective about it, as at this point, for all intents and purposes, whenever I see MSM smear the Doc, it's like them smearing my own grandpa, and I will under no circumstances let that slide. so who knows?

and, it's not like unless one is a R3VOL, they're not likely to watch, and re-watch the same interview to deconstruct and analyze it like political junkies & wonks tend to do.

also, as I'm not in Iowa, at this point, all I can do is pray and hope that all the insanely grueling amount of groundwork all the R3VOL in Iowa laid, and short of them STEALING the Caucus, he'll win in a Ron-slide, which is the only practical way to prevent them from getting away with stealing the caucus results, in which case the exit poll and their 'reported' result will have such high discrepancy, that they CANNOT lie about it.

IF they do steal it, yet the exit poll show insanely high discrepancy, the best they could do to ameliorate that is to just let the Doc have his day & have Wrongney come in at a close 2nd, as to spin to their idiot RINO & neocon constituency & the sheeple public at large that 'see Iowa still kinda matters, as Ron Paul only won by a just a few points.'

hope the campaign in Iowa is ready for anything, especially the RulingClass' attempt at votefraud or outright theft.


We'll WIN this!

Believe it!

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

bigmikedude's picture

I tend to disagree with most of the "He did great" comments

out of deep support. Maybe to us it was great.

Fact is his stance even as he explained it, won't sit well with on the fence voters. Not that what I think matters, but I don't know what the hell they were thinking by letting him do those interviews right before Iowa. And THREE of them to boot.

The campaign knew better. Don't tell me for one second they thought these interviews by media that's been so desperate to attack him, wouldn't be total hit jobs with one day before Iowa.

They knew damn well the media has been shuffling through every word Ron has ever said to find anything they can to take him down.

They also knew damn well he should have declined these interviews right before Iowa.

I don't care what anyone thinks, these coordinated hit pieces only hurt his numbers by bringing only the negatives (and cleverly out of context ones at that) to the front of peoples minds.

This was probably the absolute worst decision of the campaign so far.