119 votes

CNN: Ron Paul Interview - Says Santorum Is A Liberal ! 01/02/2012

http://youtu.be/BlWoeEurAgU

Airing Date Jan.02 2012

PAULMENTUM !!!




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

LOVE IT

Paul was BOLD and CONFIDENT, sounded Presidential ;)

deacon's picture

laugh out loud!!!

just love how he laughs at them
talking heads
sure puts a smile on my face

setting your expectations to high,can cause depression

I've noticed

in a couple of interviews now (this one include), that when the interview is over.... instead of the camera going in for a close up of the reporter (who is wrapping things up). They are pulling the camera back so you can still see RP. He knows the interview is over, and probably assumes the camera is no longer on him, so you get to see him looking around, unbuttoning his blazer etc. It kind of makes him look a little lost or confused. Do you think that's one of those subliminal things to make him look less "Presidential"? Just starting to wonder....?

Dagny
"I don't know if the world is full of smart men bluffing
or imbeciles who mean it."

Double Paul Pwnage!!

Yes, treat her like an escaped mental patient asking questions not grounded in any kind of reality whatsoever.

He's declining in the polls eh? Repeat a lie, repeat it often enough... Crap, we're running out of time to lie about Paul.

Trick is, it's got to be the SAME lie over and over to work as propaganda. When you MSM fools keep changing it every three days, you confuse the herd.

classic!

Ron and Rand are simply dyNOmite!!!

I can't quite believe that any reporter would ask the 3rd party question. If I were Ron I would say "I've answered that a hundred times. Got any other questions?"

h-daddy

Get that man some Theraflu!

He sounds more sick today than yesterday. Great interview though, and nice job of shutting down their talking point on poll numbers.

Ron Paul needs to keep his cool


Ron Paul has to be careful not to brush off or look disrespectful to reporters, because that doesn't win you 'points' with the public-at-large.

If you noticed, Rand Paul was more cool, poised, and responded with humor and a sense of optimism. That plays better.

Ron Paul needs to realize that every time he is on TV now there is some new potential voter out there that he might either turn-off or turn on. The Rand Paul approach works much better.

No! I LOVED that Double-Smackdown!

I Haven't gotten out of my chair and airboxed at a television reporter in years, but I did it twice during that interview in order to vicariously experience the Doctor's double-smackdown.

It's time all the couch potatoes, brain-fried from overexposure to broadcasts, have the media's duplicitous tactics pointed out to them in plain view. If it weren't for these propagandists and their arsenal of dirty tricks, Ron Paul would be polling at 99 percent, with the 1% lobbying superclass supporting the Anti-Paul Candidate and begging us for a light prison sentence...begging US not to indefinitely detain THEM through NDAA powers they suddenly want off the books..

Seriously, don't you think these reporters will think twice about propagandizing if they know Dr. Paul will embarrass them on live tv?

And, even if we don't win, the Ron Paul Revolution will still claim victory in the final-analysis if the sheepskin is pulled back on all these wolves.

Public-at-large...

I think the public-at-large is STARVING for someone to put these jerks in their place!
But i understand your point...i wouldnt last 2 minutes in front of these liars before i called them on their corruption! Doug Wead, i found excellent at taking your advice. My hats off to the folks that can do that ;) That being said....RON CAN WIN simply as a PROTEST to the powers that be....So perhaps the more he protests, the more support He will gather?

I'm not sure what's worse;

I'm not sure what's worse; allowing the media to manipulate the political reality by creating their own facts or offending a few people by scoffing at the media's feeble attempts.

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

.

.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

CNN just sucks

they are always looking to start a fight with him, and they smear him with abandon no matter what he does.

Ron Paul did great this time. My only suggestion would be, decline interviews with CNN. They are the worst I've seen.

I disagree.

He has a responsibility to his campaign and to all of his supporters to call the MSM out on their lies, especially CNN. I feel it makes him look more presidential to not put up with their B.S. Plus, there was a survey done recently (can't remember exactly) that revealed a significant majority of the U.S. does not trust the MSM. Thus their continued decline in viewership.

Well said

!

I'm

glad Ron Paul laughed at her when she said he was losing support...and he did it in an upbeat way, too!

O.P.O.G.G. - Fighting the attempted devolution of the rEVOLution
Ron Paul 2012...and beyond
BAN ELECTRONIC VOTING!!

This was great!

I wish Ron would tell the media stooges that their questions are very boring and that he wouldn't be surprised if many people are either changing the channel or turning off their TV...

He should say: "If you want to keep your viewers interested, why don't you ask me a new interesting question instead of the same silly questions your network always asks me?"

"So once and for all..."

Anyone wants to bet with me that CNN is going to ask the same stupid question (about 3th party run) again in the next interview?

I'm putting in $10,000. ;)

On that note..I notice they

On that note..I notice they have not asked Romney in all these interviews if he will run 3rd party if Ron Paul takes the nomination???
Why is that..
We all know the answer..they want to box him in that if the nomination is stolen from him they can attack him if he runs 3rd party.
This is your choice GOP..Ron Paul or President Obama. Personally I do not think you care if Obama wins because the policies will remain the same but if we do not get Ron Paul there will be no Romney in the WH come election time because we will not vote for him.

Who knew?

Even Mittens lurks here! ;)

I'll decline your bet, good sir.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Progress is precisely that which the rules and regulations did not foresee. - Ludwig Von Mises.

That reporter is such a tool. I bet she doesn't even know she's

a tool. (I would think most tools don't)

What ever happened to "journalistic integrity?"

What ever happened to the "five Ws" Who, What, When, Where, Why?

Why is there this obsession with "gotcha reporting?"

What assclown came up with the model of "considering this manipulated tid bit here, do you prefer evil option A or B?" or questions like "Do you still beat your wife?"

Please.

I'm glad to see the good Doctor put her in her place.

I wish I could have seen the look on her face when he called Santorum a liberal. I could tell she was incredulous. She has no clue about anything other than what her masters/handlers/tool workers tell her.

I recently read a piece on "journalistic integrity" and that traditionally, they were always reviled. It was only post civil war that the profession tried to raise their image after readership slumped so bad because their bias was obvious.

If you've ever read newsprint from the day, you'd be shocked to see just how few punches they pulled.

Perhaps they should be relegated once and for all to the bird cage.

She's apparently so wonderful...

that CNN's John King converted to Judaism for the privilege of marrying her.

I think of this quote when I

see/read these "reporters"

The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.
Thomas Jefferson

Read more: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/t/thomas_jefferson...

All of these media whores are

All of these media whores are programmed with the same script.

But hey... at least he gets to clarify over and over and over again.

Real Deal Right Here
“Give a man a gun, he can rob a bank. Give a man a central bank, and he can rob a country and the world.”
www.dailypaul.com/donate

I think

the politically correct name for today's MSM is Tabloid Media.

that 3rd minute in was great.

Ron is at the end of his rope with all the silly questions. These reporters operate in an alternate universe. They lose credibility every time they open their mouths. Ron just laughed and motioned with his hands to brush the whole silly question off. Good stuff.

Great get Dana

Now go GET a real job instead of asking mediocre questions of a man who you should be thanking for educating you. Another wannabee media hack.

beephree

This is great....

He laughs in their general direction now.

"You just pointed to all of me?"

"Great Get"

When the studio anchor said, "great get," she was talking about how competitive it is among reporters to "get" an interview.

How far we have come!

What do you think? http://consequeries.com/

The list of cheap shot questions from media

1) Will you run third party?
2) Electability? Your winning, but you can't win. Oh and are there any of your opponents that you could get behind if they were nominated?
3) 20 year old newsletter.
4) How do you feel about your poll numbers dropping going into the caucuses?

Thanks Dana

for digging into the septic tank for those questions, and then referring to the 3rd party question.
I really hope someone gets a video of her expression when Ron wins tomorrow!

But I did enjoy watching Ron & Rand together...they are so electric! Thanks for posting the video!