1 vote

Matt Taibbi : If Ron Paul Wins Iowa, the Banksters' Money will "Derail" him since he wants to End the Fed

The 1% donors are remarkably tolerant. They’ll give to just about anyone who polls well, provided they fall within certain parameters. What they won’t do is give to anyone who is even a remote threat to make significant structural changes, i.e. a Dennis Kucinich, an Elizabeth Warren, or a Ron Paul (hell will freeze over before Wall Street gives heavily to a candidate in favor of abolishing their piggy bank, the Fed). So basically what that means is that voters are free to choose anyone they want, provided it isn’t Dennis Kucinich, or Ron Paul, or some other such unacceptable personage.

If the voters insist on supporting such a person in defiance of these donors – this might even happen tonight, with a Paul win in Iowa – what you inevitably end up seeing is a monstrous amount of money quickly dumped into the cause of derailing that candidate. This takes overt forms, like giving heavily to his primary opponents, and more covert forms, like manufacturing opinions through donor-subsidized think tanks and the heavy use of lapdog media figures to push establishment complaints.

And what ends up happening there is that the candidate with the big stack of donor money always somehow manages to survive the inevitable scandals and tawdry revelations, while the one who’s depending on checks from grandma and $25 internet donations from college students always winds up mysteriously wiped out.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/iowa-the...




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Not this time, Matt.

This time, we are the winners.

Thanks for sharing. This is

Thanks for sharing. This is information we all know very well, but hopefully Rolling Stones readers will wake up to the fact that our politicians are controlled by special interests!