Called For: "Attack"-Ad against RP's most Formidable Foe..

1. We acknowledge the MSM's importance by placing our attack ads on the MSM.

2. We fork over tons of cash to the MSM.

3. The MSM can always decline our ads if they don't like them.

ripped John King's face off in South Carolina:

http://www.thewrap.com/media/column-post/fox-news-analysts-c...

I like your idea of "exposing" the MSM rather than "complaining" about them. Complaining gives them "power". We want to discredit and disarm them;take away their power to spew lies to the trusting public.

I like another DP'rs idea. We should contrast each MSM
lie with a truth (from RP,stats,flip flops,etc). Contrasting the lie with a picture of the truth seems to enhance the realization of the blatant lie and leaves a more lasting impression.

How are you going fit all of the lies, distortions, misrepresentations, omissions, slander, and degradations into one commercial?

to your endeavors:

www.reddit.com/r/RonPaulCensored/

what I have in mind would be something like this:

It's late at night. The camera pans through quiet streets in a rural village, a town, and a large city. The flickering lights of televisions emanate from most of the livingroom windows of these homes and apartments. Suddenly, as if it is occurring on a nationwide scale, windows are thrown open and there is the audible sound of mass retching as person one angrily yells "I'm (sound of person one retching)", then person two from another window in a different locale yells "mad as (sound of person two retching)", person three yells "Hell (sound of person three retching)", person four yells "and I'm (sound of person four retching)", then person five yells "not going to take it anymore! (sound of person five retching)". Dissolve. Obviously a twist on the famous scene in the movie Network.

The phrase "earlier that night" appears on the screen.

Scene two opens with the inhabitants of various other abodes ensconced in their Lazyboys reading their laptops while watching various broadcast and cable news outlets on TV. One by one focus in on what stories these people are reading about the Paul campaign on the internet while switching back and forth to the slanted news accounts of these same stories the people are watching at the same time on their televisions. Jump cut from laptop screenshots to TV news screenshots and back with increasing tempo until the pace is so rapid it becomes strobelike and visibly induces a feeling of nausea in the inhabitants (and us). Literally show their faces turning green. Meanwhile as the jumpcuts escalate the music from the shower scene in Psycho is playing in the background, gently at first, then louder and louder. At the end of the scene show the various inhabitants cupping their hands over their mouths and rising from their seats. Cue the sound of windows being thrown open all over the various neighborhoods. Dissolve.

Scene three opens. A random solitary figure is seen dilatorily peddling a bicycle through one of the above neighborhoods. As above it is late at night and the lights of televisions are flickering in the windows of the houses up and down the street. The camera focuses in from behind the rider. The man on the bike is reciting something from memory. We hear only odd bits, and only the last bit is understandable. He says "We hold these...". The sound drifts away. Suddenly lights begin to come on as windows all over the neighborhood (upstairs windows too) are thrown open and the mass sound of retching and the sickening sound of vomit (not shown) raining down on the shrubbery below is heard. Upon noticing this phenomenon of mass vomitiousness the rider, again shot from behind, stops short, stands up, dismounts and reaches for something (unclear what it is) from the basket or pannier of his bicycle. Dissolve.

The final scene, a series of shots of doorbells ringing and front doors being torn open by the residents above with green faces and hands cupped over their mouths. Clearly shown in the background of each shot is a TV showing a recognizable MSM news personality delivering a biased newsstory or ignoring him during a debate, asking a loaded question, etc. Just as clearly shown is another person (not the person opening the door) vomiting, copiously vomiting, projectile vomiting all over the image of the lamestream news figure on the TV. Only then does the camera focus on the mysterious caller standing on the stoop before the front door. At first we see him from behind shot torso down. He's holding a black satchel. As the door opens up we hear his voice and he says "I'm Ron Paul. I'm here to help."

End.

what a wonderful ideia...if I may suggest ...put images and dialogues from both sides ..first from the MSMand then from Dr PAul..like the ones with the MSM discussing about RP in a very shameful way and for every image and talking heads doing their lies and smears you would put images from the good Dr doing his best including that one when he was desperatly waving in a sort of comic way to the interviewer as well his kindness with the babies in his hands and other images of he is being gentle and sweet and things like that?what do you think?
regards and best luck for all of us
from Brazil with respect

... (just a minute ... need to wash the throw-up out of my mouth) ...OK, Newt on Fox just insulted them too. I think he believes this will help him by going after the media ... be care full. This may backfire on him ... the media is already bias against Dr. Paul ... I don't think going after them now will help. Pointing out the non-coverage on the internet is good; doing an ad maybe not ...Dr. Paul is not a cry baby like Gingich.

There is a lot of evidence of media bias out there, much of it scattered thoughout DP. The problem with trying to make the case of media bias against Paul in an advertisement is that an ad is too short to methodically and convincingly lay out all the evidence. It will be dismissed by critics in an ad of their own who will adduce counter-examples of "fair" or "neutral" coverage. No, some clever documentarian needs to take this project on at length, one who can demonstrate in context that the counter-examples the MSM and its defenders will produce were too little too late to undo the greivous damage already done to the campaign and were deployed merely as figleaves to protect the media's supposed journalistic modesty. You have to layout the timeline. You have to compare and contrast the media's coverage of Paul to that of the other candidates and demonstrate how the fortunes of their respective campaigns rose and fell depending on the tenor of the reportage.

Attacking the media worked for Newt only because they were both in on it together. It was GOP Jersey Shore. It was T-Ball. ABC set it up and sanctimonious Newt hit it right out of the park.