Home » Forums » Daily Paul Liberty Forum

Very positive clip on Fox about Ron Paul

Submitted by paul_power on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 06:36
in
0 votes

Greta Van Susteren defend his participation on the forum.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi_XBgzHxQs

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

incredible video!

Submitted by denpratt on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 13:59.

I never thought Greta was a thinker. They were all saying "Ron Paul brings real ideas that are important to discuss"!

Wow!

re[love]ution,
Dennis

—

Don't Vote For Ron Paul for anything less than
Re[love]ution & Renaissance
Dennis

it was good...but

Submitted by heart4wisdom on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 08:35.

fox is still dirty for what they did to Dr. Paul.

I hope the next money bomb is for buying a news channel that does not censor.

—

Jesus is the saviour of the WHOLE WORLD, "As in Adam all die, so too in Christ ALL shall be made alive." (ICor.15:22) All means all. The pagan 'hell' of literal fire & eternal torment is a lie and is SPIRITUAL TERRORISM. http://www.hopebeyondhell.net/blog

Wow...what a long rant

Submitted by adrianpn on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 08:24.

I'm surprised how long that was. I thought it would be about ten seconds.

Fox

Submitted by none on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 08:10.

We need to put this terrible excuse for a news outlet out of business. I will no longer click their links, watch their channel, or support their sponsors.

I don't have cable...

Submitted by paul_power on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 08:13.

My source of news is internet.

—

"If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." - Romans 12:18

Brilliant article that explains why we love Dr. Paul:
http://lewrockwell.com/orig12/farber-r1.1.1.html

Barely

Submitted by ShineTheLight on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 08:00.

If they would not keep say, "He is NOT going to be President." Good grief.

We need 100% exit polling done by "third parties combined" outside of the two parties. Simple, fast. It needs to get done now.

Once again, why we need to be different!

Submitted by FireTeamforFreedom on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 07:42.

Here's a couple things I see:

1. We need to concentrate on issues that distinguish us apart from the others.
A. Monetary Policy (the invisible tax)
B. Non-Inter. Foreign Policy.
C. The Economy and out of control government spending
D. Why another George Bush is going to be a disaster
E. War on Drugs.

Everything else, that in effect, makes us look the same, is not something to concentrate on.

Character is not built on easy, it's built on hard. In the initial months of the Revolutionary War, it looked hopeless, but they fought on! We need to show our character...just like Rocky Balboa...people admired him because he just won't quit! That shows them, the heart and the passion, we have for the issues that matter!!!

Mike
Who is Ron Paul? I am Ron Paul! We are Ron Paul!
"Fire Team for Freedom" on RonPaulRadio.com
Mondays and Wednesdays 10pm EST
or visit www.mikeandjake.com

—

Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom"
visit www.mikeandjake.com

[We need to concentrate on

Submitted by Veterans Abroad on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 08:08.

[We need to concentrate on issues that distinguish us apart from the others.
A. Monetary Policy (the invisible tax)]

Agreed

[B. Non-Inter. Foreign Policy]

He already stresses this to the exclusion of issues that could get him 40% of the Republican vote, such as opposing Internet regulation.

[C. The Economy and out of control government spending]

Needs to stress earmarks more. He recently allowed his opponents to win against him on that by pointing out that he put earmarks in himself. He should have brushed that off better and pressed forward on the subject.

He needs to show more follow-through when he gets a breakthrough on the public's attention span.

[D. Why another George Bush is going to be a disaster]

Better to explain specific freedoms that we have lost, such as the right to be anonymous when meeting others (online).

Just saying Bush was a disaster makes him equal to Joe Biden.

[E. War on Drugs]

Except for the general support for medical marijuana users, nobody really cares about protecting others rights to ingest substances. This is because, rightly or wrongly in terms of our rights, the public generally believes that an intoxicated person can drive over them while they are walking on the sidewalk. Prohibition did not work for alcohol, but it is not seen as a problem for smoked products. I am in complete agreement with anti-smoking laws (like the vast majority of the public of most countries) because someone else's smoke violently attacks me when I try to breathe (I understand the property rights argument but I also see it as insane for any business owner to think that their customers spend more when their appetites are being suppressed by smoke - it has been proven in country after country that food sales skyrocket when cigarettes are banned in restaurants).

In any event, Ron Paul would drop down to 3% support if he came out against smoking laws.

Better topic:

War on Men. Laws forcing men to be background checked just to be allowed to socialize. Laws making it easier for men to be falsely accused and convicted. These subjects have been proven to win the support of 2 out of 3 Republicans including Republican women.

If any of Ron Paul's campaign advisors think that discussion of "men's rights" would hurt the "women's vote"...then they are dooming the campaign.

This is the area where most of the bipartisan action is going on against real freedom.

Hitler accurately predicted that he would come to power via laws that "protect women and children".

There are dozens of topics at www.mensnewsdaily.com that Ron Paul could use to get everyone but the most rabid feminists to be on his side about. The other Republican candidates really do support radical feminist positions regarding men. It would be a turkey shoot to oppose them on it.

Thank you Greta

Submitted by JohnKing on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 07:38.

Greta is the only principled talking head at FOX.

Thank you Greta.

—

Socialists are Everywhere

Kudos but methinks along this line

Submitted by azminuteman on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 08:01.

She got tired of the "put Ron Paul on the forum" emails, now she wants "Thank you" emails.

She sounds like a supporter!

Submitted by paul_power on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 08:28.

Hahaha!!!

—

"If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." - Romans 12:18

Brilliant article that explains why we love Dr. Paul:
http://lewrockwell.com/orig12/farber-r1.1.1.html

Fox in a Box!

Submitted by soulmantim on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 07:38.

Who the hell are they?
TWO separate forums?

Let's put it this way, if Ron Paul was black and they suggested 2 seperate forums, one for the white candidates and one for the black candidates there would be a little protesting there wouldn't there?

To hell with them, our call isn't a beg or a plea, ITS A DEMAND!

To hell with Greta and that baby faced a##hat.

I bet they spent 45 minutes saying "Huckabee" 1000 times straight, and this is probably the 3 minutes that they spent out of the 24 hour day actually talking about Ron Paul.

It only showed the

Submitted by dcalifano on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 07:33.

BAISED idiots they are all the more if you ask me. The only REASON that Dr. Paul did not do better in Iowa than he did was because the MSM has pretty much blacked him out.

My daughter called me the other night, and said "MA! I have so and so on the phone, and I'm telling her about Ron Paul and she's saying 'I DONT KNOW WHO RON PAUL IS' WHAT DO I SAY TO HER? SHE LAUGHING! ...

So I gave her some talking points before she clicked back over to her friend.

Do you want my honest opinion? I think after the last money bomb many of us got lazy, and I think that some of us thought that Iowa was going to put us on the map.

We have a lot of hard work to do people. Do I think 10% is great considering the black out of our fine candidate? Yes, but we need to do better.

Faux

Submitted by MashTheGas on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 07:05.

Yes, good clip. Faux is being forced to at least mention RP. It was very telling when Greta questioned about RP being left out of the debates she said, "At the risk of getting in trouble", that spoke volumes to me! Shepard immediately tried to fix it by saying no no they won't get in trouble. BS, these dolts have been briefed not to mention RP. Last night they had no choice.

Thanks for posting the clip.

RP08!

It's my pleasure.

Submitted by paul_power on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 07:24.

Thank you for commenting. I think the media will start to treat Ron Paul with more respect now.

—

"If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." - Romans 12:18

Brilliant article that explains why we love Dr. Paul:
http://lewrockwell.com/orig12/farber-r1.1.1.html

More media

Submitted by MashTheGas on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 07:30.

I hope so, but don't bank on it. I'm watching the morning shows and they are all skipping around mentioning RP, it's pathetic. It has been very clear before now, but this morning it screams that they are 100%, purposely marginalizing RP.

Yep, good ole MSM still at it

Submitted by HellraiserSix on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 08:24.

Yes they are purposely marginalizing Dr. Paul. I was listening to the Fox News channel on Sirius radio on my way to work this morning and got so angry as the reporter read the results from last night. He did the usual listing of the candidates in finishing order along with their percentages, but what really set me off was the way he chuckled as he started to read Ron Pauls numbers (as in disbelief that he could possibly have done so well) but restored his serious tone while reading Rudy's poor percentage. WTF?

Maybe we have to win the hard way

Submitted by paul_power on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 07:39.

.

—

"If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." - Romans 12:18

Brilliant article that explains why we love Dr. Paul:
http://lewrockwell.com/orig12/farber-r1.1.1.html

The MSM is going to start

Submitted by free4all on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 07:00.

The MSM is going to start putting a positive spin on RP now that the only real primary is over and he finished 5th. Almost all the other primaries rely on those damn Diebold machines, and they are most certainly rigged. So it is now safe for the MSM to praise RP.

I hope You are wrong.

Submitted by paul_power on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 07:05.

I'm afraid you are right.

—

"If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." - Romans 12:18

Brilliant article that explains why we love Dr. Paul:
http://lewrockwell.com/orig12/farber-r1.1.1.html