| |
  
|
||||||||||
Hillary is DEAD IN THE WATER!!!
Submitted by GetBackToWhereY... on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 11:54
Did you see her speech last night? She's terrible, I can't even stand to look at her. And then for Obama to give one of the strongest speeches I've heard in years right after her. She's dead, after one debate, dead as hell. Paul vs. Obama in November. What a race that will be! » |
|
|||||||||
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
Iowa 0% correct on dems
Iowa 0% correct on dems side.....
Obama didn't win Hillary lost
If you understand how the Democratic caucus works, you'll realize this.
Obama is just Clinton lite anyway
Right
One voter bluntly told the interviewer this. Then she said she is going back to vote for Paul in November. That is why there was such a huge increase in voters, because they went out to vote against Hillbilly
Yeah, Obama's acceptance speech was very moving
NOT.
'Change' - they been using that one for the last 40 years (and nothing, of course has changed, at least not for the better). All that was missing was the JFK hand gesticulations (Gary Hart had it down pat) and the New England accent.
as long as hillary loses and
RP does well enough to gain respect I am happy.
O goodness
Me too!!
Obama sounded like MLK?
in cadence, tone, inflection, etc.... Somebody below mentioned this, and I heard that too, mentioned it to my wife. Seemed clear to me that he is trying to subliminally link himself to MLK.
While he is a charismatic speaker, I've never heard him say how he would do anything specific, just generalities like 'bring change', 'unite us', etc.
That's what I like about Ron Paul, he says how he'll do it.
--------
We don't know how to mind our own business
'Cause the whole worlds got to be just like us
Now we are fighting a war over there
No matter who's the winner
We can't pay the cost
-Steppenwolf 1969
'Cause there's a monster on the loose
Reading
He seemed to be reading off something on the left and then speaking to the right. He Never, ever, ever looked straight out front. It was funny. He seemed very uneasy to me and not genuine, very political and as if he was accepting the whole darn presidency.
d
d
d
d
I'm with you on that
I'm with you on that one.
Obama NEVER says how he's going to bring out "change".
We all know how Ron Paul will operate as President, because he follows the Constitution RELIGIOUSLY. That is exactly why I trust him and will vote for him.
I tell people exactly that. Even if you don't agree with Ron Paul at least you know exactly how he operates.
The Witch
She's like a Vampire she's not dead until the Stake is in the heart.......
Did anyone else think
that Obama sounded just like MLK in his speech last night? The cadence of his voice when he kept repeating "they said" over and over again sounded just like MLK's I Have a Dream speech. I had never noticed that before last night - they said he was having problems with his voice so maybe it was a coincidence.
I know this sounds funny, but....
...how about a Paul/Clinton ticket? Wouldn't this unite both parties? Would we not get alot done in the next 4 years??
January 03,2008.
"A people can move through the ages, and not disrupt time. A single man can take this movement of people and change history" Saul4Paul on Ron Paul, the coming civil war.
G_d bless
Attend a Church of your choice this Saturday
Sorry, I don't get the joke.
Sorry, I don't get the joke. Not funny.
Putting Hillary Clinton one heartbeat away from the Presidency, considering Vince Foster and a host of others, is a bad idea.
We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by
obama..
obama is for change, not sure what he means because he never really says just like every other democrat...
I'd like real, clear change. the kind that RP is pushing.
Obama will be harder to defeat, but there's still a % of america sadly that is racist and won't vote for him.
-----
A great empire, like a great cake, is most easily diminished at the edges. - Ben Franklin
Yes
But it is an incredibly small percentage, don't believe the crap about the South - they will sneak up and kill us. Obama is almost impossible to defeat at this point. He just won a state with 96% caucasian! (mostly central European decent and very Christian) Go Hitlary!
www.libertyrestorationproject.org
"We are the inheritors of the American Enlightenment, which tells us that Individual Liberty always trumps collectivism in all forms."
Go back to OZ, Hildabeast
"Ding, Dong the bitch is dead"...sorry, I read the post title and the song just popped into my head.... lol. But, Obama is far easier to beat. He has little experience and wants to double the amount of foreign aid. Can't you just see Dr. Paul grilling him on that during a debate! Obama is a good speaker, but lousy in debates. He can't think on his feet and doesn't know enough about the economy to work the Exact Change lane at a toll booth.
Obama is not a natural speaker!
Obama's speeches have always been effective and convincing when speeches were prepared. In debates, he has always been ordinary and mumbles a lot. Among democrats, Kucinich is the best when it comes debates and Richardson is the worst. Among Republicans, Huckabee is the best and Thompson is the worst. The similarity among all of them with the exception of Kucinich is that they whatever they speak of, whether articulately or in a mumbling fashion, is all bull shit.
Ron Paul is the only guy who speaks sense all the time otherwise he is not a real good speaker though.
That actually sucks!!
Campaign for Hillary!! (Well, at least to those of your friends who are "lost" anyway)
Obama is a much more difficult challenge. He has the "get out of jail card" of not being in the Senate to vote for war and can get Independents with that. I DO NOT want to face Obama in the general election. Hitlary on the other hand - easy pickin's! It's simple: Hitlary nominated/RP wins in a landslide. Obama wins/A close fight with a charasmatic empty-suit speech-maker (perfect for most Americans).
www.libertyrestorationproject.org
"We are the inheritors of the American Enlightenment, which tells us that Individual Liberty always trumps collectivism in all forms."
democrats
I did see her speech last night and what I recall was that she didn't speak of herself as the eventual winner of the D primary, she said we'll have a democrat in the white house. I think that was her first point.
Independents in NH are going to surge to stop Hillary for good
Unfortunately for us, many Independents in NH are going to flock to vote against Hillary instead of voting for RP on the 8th.
In Iowa, this is what happened that prevented us from getting the 15,000 I was hoping for.
In Iowa, even Republicans were registering as "Dems for a Day" so they could vote against Hillary.
Those weren't all real Dems you were seeing in the CNN Caucus videos of Dem caucuses