0 votes

Something to think about: We legitimize the Fed when we talk about the "National debt"

Seeing as:

1. Federal Reserve Notes are not public money, but private credit
2. The Constitution demands only gold and silver as lawful money
3. The "money" owed when we speak of the "National debt" is nothing more than a loan of private property from a private cartel to a so-called "government" that has stepped outside of its constitutional bounds

No wonder Kennedy was offed. He must have known this.

As the baby says in that ad campaign: "It's not my debt!"

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Northwest Ordinance 13 July 1787 Federal debt originates

Art. 4. The said territory, and the States which may be formed therein, shall forever remain a part of this Confederacy of the United States of America, subject to the Articles of Confederation, and to such alterations therein as shall be constitutionally made; and to all the acts and ordinances of the United States in Congress assembled, conformable thereto. The inhabitants and settlers in the said territory shall be subject to pay a part of the federal debts contracted or to be contracted, and a proportional part of the expenses of government, to be apportioned on them by Congress according to the same common rule and measure by which apportionments thereof shall be made on the other States; and the taxes for paying their proportion shall be laid and levied by the authority and direction of the legislatures of the district or districts, or new States, as in the original States, within the time agreed upon by the United States in Congress assembled. The legislatures of those districts or new States, shall never interfere with the primary disposal of the soil by the United States in Congress assembled, nor with any regulations Congress may find necessary for securing the title in such soil to the bona fide purchasers. No tax shall be imposed on lands the property of the United States; and, in no case, shall nonresident proprietors be taxed higher than residents.

I'm definitely no fan of this

I'm definitely no fan of this kind of terminology, either... nor of constructs like "Each household's share of the debt is (insert absurd amount of money here)."

Sorry, not my debt. I know they repeatedly rob me to pay off their own profligacy, waste, and corruption, but they can't get me to intellectually accept this debt has anything to do with me personally.