BREAKING: Twitter Trail Confirms "China Jon" Video as "False Flag", Points to Huntsman Campaign

Wow is that some piece. Of course it will get buried by msm.

An even more enlightening, almost 'smoking gun' type piece implicating the vast conspiracy against RP and exposing the machinations and manipulations, is linked below. Whomever is behind theendrun.com I'd like to kiss.

http://www.theendrun.com/something-rotten-in-iowa-the-hackti...

I think we already know the answer. In short, FAT CHANCE!

That's why I hope Ron Paul pursues this lawsuit like a keenly focused, ravaging grizzly bear to expose the perpetrator(s), likely to be Huntsman's daughters. Then once exposed, I'd love to see Ron Paul go Cujo on the lamestream media's a** in front of a national audience for disseminating such horsesh** without even a cursory check.

And if it does turn out to be Huntsman's daughters and Jon having any knowledge or involvement than I think child protection should take his children by using them as objects for personal gain. Because that would be deplorable!

Of huntsman speaking Chinese to his daughter? Explain this to me and I'll tell you who did it. And hashtagging jon2012girls in the first tweet, wow that's pretty sloppy if they did indeed do it. Haha. Whatever comes of this remember: we are victorious, still in the running while huntsman is now the chairperson of his billionaire daddy's foundation. Haha, karma!

By far and away the biggest shame in all of this is the media's willful blindness toward the fact that this was CLEARLY not a legitimate "ad" and therefore not a story at all. The media put this story to the general public even though they KNEW the source was anonymous and likely a plant.

Nobody can look at that video and NOT think right away that this was faked. You can't stop crap like this from getting made, but you CAN be a real journalist and not propagate obvious slander.

Maybe this is enough for a subpena?

So...the reporters/professional Paul-haters who first covered the story MUST have known it was an "inside job," because it was immediately sent to them.

Based on the info in the second article, it looks to me like Huntsman's daughters did it.

They [Huntsman'st daughters] were apparently so quick to the draw that only 39 people on all of Twitter had tweeted the already-going-viral video. If you look at the list of the first 40 Tweets provided above, you’ll see that the last one says, “@jamemiami @Jon2012Girls This video has nothing to do with Ron Paul or his supporters”. This person likely saw Huntsman’s daughter’s tweet and was responding to it.

Less than 24 hours earlier:

JON HUNTSMAN: Just tell Dr. Paul that I owe him a tweet in return, and he should be– he should be expecting one some time soon.

PIERS MORGAN (CNN): I think you should do what Mitt Romney does and get the dirty work done by somebody else. In your case maybe your daughters could unleash themselves on Twitter on him. I think that might be a better way of doing it. Keep your hands out of it.

JON HUNTSMAN: They’ve got plenty– they’ve got plenty up their sleeves Piers, and you might be surprised at what they release in the next few days.

Think about the timing...

I read the whole thing. It was really long, but I'm really glad somebody wrote about this in depth.

So, what does this whole thing really say? Whoever made that video is an evil, dark-hearted person and I'm sure that person's life reflects the kind of person they are. I kind of feel bad for someone with that kind of vapid soul. Honestly, I don't know or care if it was his daughters or not. They have some people in the campaign that are new-media savvy and apparently without conscience.

Anyway, one thing that this article lacks (I know, I know...) is a probable scenario of how the whole thing really came to be. Even though the video was poorly made, it still must have taken some time to put it together. I know the prevailing thought was that this is in retaliation by his daughters from a tweet from the RP campaign about the Iowa caucuses, but I don't think so. That tweet was not all that bad or harmful to Huntsman and at this point they could care less about a personal feud with Paul.

No, the more likely scenario is that the Hunstman campaign had schemed and devised this false-flag attack months ago. It was clearly part of a bigger strategy.

* Think about the timing of this video. It was released AFTER Iowa (Jon was ignoring) and BEFORE New Hampshire (Jon's first real contest). If you were to pick the perfect time for something like this to go viral within the entire campaign season, would it not be at this very time? Down to the day? The very day! This is not a knee jerk reaction to a tweet!

* The video said absolutely nothing about Ron Paul. The video was all about Hunstman and Ron Paul's name was just tacked on at the end. Most likely this video was cleverly crafted to have the right look and emotional feel and also touch upon three key points that Jon wanted to boast about. Any honest person with a brain can see that this video was designed to garner sympathy for Jon Hunstman, have shock news value to create buzz, and to give Jon an opportunity to get into the news cycle to brag about himself (disguised as defending himself against a viscous attack). No, I'm sure the campaign was ready to tack on the name of any opponent who Hunstman wanted to target one week before the NH primary. Could have been Bachmann, Cain, etc. but Jon's biggest rival happened to be Ron Paul.

Jon's daughters may be young and hip with tech, but that does not mean they necessarily did this. Anybody close to the campaign could have, but it is clear there was a strategy to it.

Man, I hate liars.