1 vote

Town Hall Meeting with Congressman Reed

Joined a local group on meetup and sent this to them today. What does you think?

I am new to the group but I just wanted to spread the word that I just came from the Victor Town Hall meeting with Tom Reed. I learned that I am young and wasn't assertive about my question, raised my hand multiple times without answer. I feel my appearance was threatening as my demographic (military age males) are known Ron Paul supporters, not to mention I was the youngest person there. I also sent up a paper question that I feel was censored by the Assemblyman who was selecting questions. I wanted to know what this guy intends to do about Sec 1031 NDAA FY12. I am 23 former noncommissioned officer and Iraq Veteran currently training to be an officer of the United States Armed forces. I wanted to express my concern over being used for martial law in preservation of the status quo, I will not obey orders if they tell me to arrest US Citizens without due process, but not only that the use of martial law is unconstitutional regardless. The wording in Sec 1031 of this bill does not explicitly exclude US citizens from indefinite detention by the US Military, under vague terminology such as "terrorists and associated forces." These laws are designed to construct and construe the bill however they would like to interpret it. Think about it. If a bill reads "Sec. -- may or Sec. --- may not." It means the same thing. If a judge says he may impose a fine or he may not impose a fine, doesn't that mean he can impose a fine either way? Is anyone else worried about this? Advice for attending future meetings?

With Liberty and Love,
Cecil

SEC. 1031. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.
4
(a) In General- Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the law of war.
(b) Covered Persons- A covered person under this section is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
1
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.
(c) Disposition Under Law of War- The disposition of a person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may include the following:
1
(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
(2) Trial under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code (as amended by the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (title XVIII of Public Law 111-84)).
(3) Transfer for trial by an alternative court or competent tribunal having lawful jurisdiction.
(4) Transfer to the custody or control of the person’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity.
(d) Construction- Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
4
(e) Authorities- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities, relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.
(f) Requirement for Briefings of Congress- The Secretary of Defense shall regularly brief Congress regarding the application of the authority described in this section, including the organizations, entities, and individuals considered to be ‘covered persons’ for purposes of subsection (b)(2).