6 votes

Obama Eligibility …blow By Blow

[via Paul Bourgeois MeetUp Tampa/Clearwater (48)]

This is a court case that took place in GA today....it had a live
stream to it...Please keep it clean and remove all email addresses
before forwarding and use BCC please!

Thursday, January 26, 2012
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am

Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a
lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of
course, was Obama.

The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.

Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia
eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed
a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.

The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution
and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the
point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012
ballot in Georgia.

With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen
fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the
attorneys and the appearance of the judge.

Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was
nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing
in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.

Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had
attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He
first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant
to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under
the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later,
that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.

After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court,
Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State
attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was
not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.

Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later
telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate
but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.

Game on.

5 minutes.

10 minutes.

15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.

20 minutes.

It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all
go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s
chambers.

Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to
participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he
placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to
appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or,
non action?

Certainly not.

Court is called to order.

Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.

Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.

Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered
into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in
1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that
his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave
Kenya.

Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.

June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s
status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were
gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.

Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given
citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written
opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between
“citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the
Minor vs Happersett opinion.

It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the
definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out
that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court
opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett
opinion.

The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents
who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United
States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that
Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.

Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be
taken accordingly.

Carl Swinson takes the stand.

Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws
applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the
challenge to it by Swinson.

2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony
regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia
ballot and his candidacy.

Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.

Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.

RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.

DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified
while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to
establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not
qualified.

Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their
desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not
participate.

Dreams >From My Father entered.

Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.

Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into
evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of
Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.

This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.

At this point, the judge takes a recess.

The judge returns.

David Farrar takes the stand.

Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as
Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.

Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.

Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney
showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing
Obama’s last name something other than Obama.

State Licensed PI takes the stand.

She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social
Security number for him from 1979. Professional opinion given that
this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in
1979, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the
number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in
1890 and should never have been used by Obama.

Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.

Next witness takes the stand.

This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He
testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is
layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that
different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one
original document.

Linda Jordan takes the stand.

Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is
not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent.
This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.

Next witness.

Mr. Gogt.

Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.

Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama,
is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused
by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing
this, is considered to be a fraud.

States this is a product of layering.

Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would
not show such layering.

Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should
not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand
stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same
indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by
computer.

Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former
immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.

Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was
issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of MA. Obama never resided in MA.
At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.

Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others
issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others
and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.

Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr.
Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual
with regards to immigration records.

Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth
records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be
filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.

Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should
be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can
know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.

Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he
resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.

Taitz takes the stand herself.

Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he
is hiding his identity and citizenship.

Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.

Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence
presented, ineligible to serve as President.

And with that, the judge closes the hearing.

What can we take away from this?

It’s interesting.

Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.

One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.

WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?

Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security
number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in
question.

One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under
the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions,
to be eligible to serve as President.

What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems
nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence,
because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama
will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.

It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in
other states as well.

Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do
unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wow

IFf POTUS is found to not be above the law, then there is something in this country still worth saving for sure!

...............

...............

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

update: 5 states join in:

http://www.whiteoutpress.com/articles/q12012/obama-ballot-ch...

This court case and the evidence is now officially on record!

estanislao

the Skinny:

Expert Testimony and documents gained from the Freedom of Information Act:

1)Obama's certificate is a forgery.
2)Obama is using a fraudulent SS#
3)Obama's father was never a US citizen (POTUS must have both US parents)
4)Obama's last name is probably not Obama
5)Obama is not eligible to be on the GA ballot
6)Obama is not eligible to be President

estanislao

How is it that both parents

How is it that both parents must be citizens. The Constitution states nothing else than: "The President must be a natural born citizen of the United States, at least 35 years old and a resident of the United States for at least 14 years."

Yes, you have Minor v. Happersett from 1875, but then you have United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).

Some time, Rock, when the team is up against it, when things are wrong and the breaks are beating the boys, ask them to go in there with all they've got and win just one for the Gipper.

...

From my understanding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark had to do with whether or not he was legally a citizen. You can be a citizen and not be eligible to be president.

NOTE: I am not advocating violence in any way. The content of the post is for intellectual, theoretical, and philosophical discussion. FEDS, please don't come to my house.

http://naturalborncitizen.wor

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/09/minor-v-h...

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

Perfect

*and in Georgia's Case the Secretary of State WILL support the results. More states are certain to follow after ruling in the next few days.