Eyewitness samples
Submitted by Dr.K.Research on Tue, 02/07/2012 - 21:03As a protection of peoples' privacy this has been removed. An analysis of the data versus GOP postings may follow, if possible.
As a protection of peoples' privacy this has been removed. An analysis of the data versus GOP postings may follow, if possible.
|
★
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here

GUYS GUYS GUYS!!! We worked our butts off!! ALL
delegates named on this list should be posted anonymous!! Names being revealed on here, do you think they are going to vote them through to the county and state level. Please remove your names.
Take these www.3StepsTowardFreedom.com to assist Ron Paul in becoming our next Commander In Chief. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-480OMya3U
OK; names will be removed and later posted with precinct #s
Thanks for the info.
Hello, the campaign needs the names you have, in case they
have not reported, plus if you have researched anyone who had voted at Adleson we need to inform them, either email me or call the campaign and I can explain a little further, but this needs to be done a.s.a.p. We also need to get in touch with those Paul supporters who became delegates for strategy. The campaign has ideas and those folks need to be notified privately if possible. The campaign can do it once they have their names.
You know what I am saying??!!
Take these www.3StepsTowardFreedom.com to assist Ron Paul in becoming our next Commander In Chief. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-480OMya3U
From Precinct 1677
My name is Bob Tracey. I post here as bobspirit. I got access to the campaign votertracker system in November, and that is when I started walking my precinct.
Out of the hundreds of registered republicans in my precinct, 16 showed up. 12 went for Paul, 2 for Santorum, 2 for Romney, and 1 for Gingrich. 5 delegates, all for Paul. Here are my observations and perceptions.
First and foremost, this is winnable. But it can only happen face to face, one heart and mind at a time. I learned this walking my precinct and talking to people. Phone calls, mailing, and e-mails are poor substitutes for a live human being.
31 precincts were gathered at Silverado high school, and a volunteer was needed for each to act as a caucus chair and run the meeting in which delegates were chosen, and the presidential poll taken. As we only has 10 volunteers, someone had to figure out who was going to chair all of these precincts. I took it upon myself to go into the other 21 precinct meetings and recruit a volunteer to chair, and a volunteer to assist, and then gave them a crash course on how to chair the meting, which was fun since I hadn't even done my own yet.
I began each meeting the same way. I expressed gratitude to every American who bothered to get up early on a chilly Saturday morning and show up to contribute to the change in leadership we seek. I stressed our unity as AMERICANS, not as republicans.
Do I think you have be pretty much brain dead to vote for anyone other than Paul, hell yes I do, and I have the equivalent of a doctorate in economics to prove it, but guess what? What you resist, persists, and you don't win over hearts and minds with anything other than love.
I handled my meeting pretty easily, and then went back to the cafeteria where everything was being tabulated.
I observed and assisted in collecting sealed envelopes with indiviual ballots inside them for all 31 precincts. Another Paul supported there took a picture of each one. While I did not total them, I am fast with numbers. it was clear Romney was ahead, and Santorum and Gingrich all zeroes and single digits. Clearly, from what I saw, Paul was going to take second. Lots of mormons here, and they were organized and plentiful, but few were willing to go the extra mile to be a delegate ($40 bucks please!). Paul will get a proportion of delegates far exceeding the actual votes.
I do not know how the vote count was swung over to Gingrich, but I do know the clark county party chair, Dave Gibbs, is an ardent Gingrich supporter. However it was done, we got beat, so I support the campaign decision to move on.
So what did I learn? I learned the people who we perceive to be our adversaries are also our countrymen, and it is only through unity with our countrymen that liberty will be restored.
We Paul supportes understand the nature of our debt slavery, but even the average politically active republican and democrat have no idea that they were born into a system of modern feudalism. They simply do not know.
They are not the enemy. Ignorance and fear are the enemy.
For if they did know, what would they do? They would join us, wouldn't they?
The bankers have ruled over civilization now since 1693, over 300 years. It is a monetary system based in fear, fear that there is not enough so I must have more, and it is coming to it's unaviodable demise.
It is dying because it is man's nature to love, yet every day life presents us with the choice between fear and love. Every moment contains this choice, and we cannot avoid it.
If liberty will prevail, it is because we chose love.
This battle cannot be lost. It isn't possible. Yet along the way we are going to run into hardened GOP operatives, people in this system far longer than we, who will want to cling to the illusion of their power. They beleive to have power, they must take it from you. We know better.
We know liberty for all spreads and multiplies power, so that there is more than enough to go around.
So it isn't enough to show up. We must deal with our own fears so that THE REAL US shows up. The ones tapped into the divine source of power that lives in each of us.
Ghandi taught us that we must be the change we wish to see in the world. So ask yourself, how can I serve myself, my family, and my country, with love. Act on that answer.
If we show up with the power of love, what can stand against that? Look at our leader. He teaches us that every day. Are we not listening?
Me, I'm going to go find Dave Gibbs this week and see if he needs any help. Jeez, he supports Gingrich, I figure he's freaking desperate, lol.
So let's skip the troll fears, everyone who visits is our countrymen, and lets do what we need to do to manage OUR fears so we can help the poor schmucks who really believe IRAN is our most dangerous enemy, and not the SOBS that are printing our money.
Anyone wants to write to me, I am at bobspirit56@gmail.com.
Love to all my countrymen and women.
Peace out from Las Vegas.
GUYS GUYS GUYS!!! We worked our butts off!! ALL
delegates named on this list should be posted anonymous!! Names being revealed on here, do you think they are going to vote them through to the county and state level. Please remove your names.
Take these www.3StepsTowardFreedom.com to assist Ron Paul in becoming our next Commander In Chief. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-480OMya3U
Here is the Nevada Votes Broken Down by Precinct
http://www.nvgopcaucus.com/caucus-precinct-results
They are PDF files when you click on the counties.
REVELATION Chapter 13
Maybe this only...
verifies what the campaign is saying about delegates and not votes. Maybe thats what really counted was our delegates showing up.
please forgive me for
not reading all the wonderful posts below, i read about half.
i desperately need help in finding how to post an excel spreadsheet of the clark county votes.
this is excellent work you did and i'm adding it to the spreadsheet as VERIFIED on the individual precincts. if anyone wants a copy please let me know
GUYS GUYS GUYS!!! We worked our butts off!! ALL
delegates named on this list should be posted anonymous!! Names being revealed on here, do you think they are going to vote them through to the county and state level. Please remove your names.
You are giving away ALL RP names......!!!!!
Take these www.3StepsTowardFreedom.com to assist Ron Paul in becoming our next Commander In Chief. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-480OMya3U
Yes, I do want those results, thank you
Pistei, can you send me a copy? I can have someone hear if you approve put it all into an excel spreadsheet. But I'm post ignorant.
Regards;
K You may email it at, too: drkresearch@hotmail.com.
sent it to your email
it is already in excel form
Don't let them do it again.
Expect the D's and GOP to lie cheat and steal to stop Dr. Paul from getting elected.
Even though his strategy is to accumulate delegates, most people don't understand the process and judge success by the popular vote, so if they can make sure that Dr. Paul has a low percentage of the popular vote, it won't be too hard to yank delegates away. And that's why it's important for him to also make sure and get a larger percentage of the popular vote and not let the establishment take it away from him.
Delegates or other Dr. Paul voters need to videotape the results in precincts, especially elections with electronic voting machines. Revoutin pac is going to start exit polls but we need to protect the vote.
Four-minute video showing exactly what to do:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3_xFb1sWKU
blackboxvoting.org
These numbers cannot be correct!
Because the establishment says so! Just ask Brian Middleton....
(Satire)
By the way
Thanks for the hard work Dr K.
Any updates Dr K or news from
Any updates Dr K or news from the campaign regarding this data?
Thank You Dr. K .
It sure looks like Ron Paul came in second in Nevada, from your research.
And doesn't it seem very strange that Rick Sanitarium went from a distant 4th place, to 1st place in the three events held yesterday, the 7th of Feb. ???
By the way, have you completed the "Paul Care" research paper yet? I'd really like to get a copy.
beesting
It's the Churches that skewed the vote plus some dirty tricks
In Minnesota the big player was the Churches and congregations. They came as large blocks to the caucuses, mostly people who have never caucused before, as I have from eyewitnesses. Those blocks were huge enough to distort the vote. Even so, no one can rule out a degree of fraud: we should all look for it.
Send me an email and I'll fire off all such articles:
drkresearch@hotmail.com bless you!
Dear Dr.K.Research, Thanks
Dear Dr.K.Research,
Thanks for all your work. Can the campaign help you get individual precinct info? Supposedly each candidate could have a representative at the recount. The GOP has to have numbers by precinct.
Thanks for compiling this data.
Maybe forward your findings to the campaign, they might have use of it.
I count 1800 precincts, but close enough.
My question would be why are there only ≈ 1800 yet there are precinct numbers in the 7600+ range?
Are they simply not reporting results from 5900+ precincts?
Or is there some weird numbering scheme. 7600 does sound like a large number for a small state.
I talked to the county elections boards
and they said that one county doesn't communicate with the other, and has no idea of what the other does for numbers. The poster is right and it has been corrected. Thank you for alerting me to the fact that these numbers were duplicated. It is fortunate that you know so much about the details of the election process, considering that the Board of Elections didn't even know about this duplication (see below). Who would have known, otherwise?
That does not detract from the suspect methods/tactics used by the GOP, as follows:
The NVGOP said it was going to use google and especially twitter to get out the results. According to reporters at the Las Vegas Sun the GOP sent a bunch of tweets out, because of the "delays" in the count to "give an idea" of how it was going.
A note about this current data: We are asking all people who attended the caucuses to come forward. It is actual caucus attendees who have independently posted the data you see. The request for additional certifiable results that they truly witnessed, zeros or not. If there are zeros, they will be listed. Let's go ahead and urge all Paul witnesse to come forward, low numbers or not.
I, like many others, am so hopeful to see Ron Paul elected that perhaps in this case I was overzealous. But that doesn't mean that chicanery doesn't exist: it does. There are violations upon violations, Rand Paul himself alluding to being cheated in 2008 with ballots being kept secretly in a safe. So, now, by your post I have confirmed the two 7532 precincts. When I contacted the county officials, they themselves were suprised at the duplication. So, now that this is on the table are you willing to work together to confirm the data? The fraudulent activity in Nevada is widely reported, not just on this post.
The GOP tweeted out numbers without proof of preservation of the chain of custody. How do we know these numbers are real? This is the first post attempting to document this. Why don't we work together to prove whether their results are real or not? People are spreading these out on the sites as official. As I have verified with numerous authorities these were sent by the GOP to the news-outlets in the midst of the election "to give an idea." Bogus or Real? Let's find out.
There's a lot of work involved in this. Let's work as a team and do it. Thanks for all your efforts.
I'm all for your efforts. I was never against them.
And perhaps you also mistook me for someone pointing out duplicate precinct numbers. I can't take that credit, I wasn't paying that much attention, must have been someone else.
Anyhow, that is odd. And boy, what a mess that could cause!
Glad to see someone is trying to verify the vote.
Keep up the good work!
p.s. why aren't you showing county numbers with the precincts? Or county names?
I do agree with you
about the caution. At least we are keeping them honest. I just coallated the material the best I could from Paul voters on the net. It's all that was available. But, now, GOP has released precincts. So, far they check out. I'll fill in the gaps, thanks.
Each county numbers their precincts independently
That's why the twitter data reported from each precinct the day of the caucuses had both a county number and a precinct number. The precinct number may not be unique.
That's also why the "absolute proof of fraud" article that got deleted, and replaced with the text you see above, was bogus. (But, seriously, when someone grabs a comment off of some anti-Paul blog and claims that it's "absolute proof of fraud" everyone's BS detector should be going off. How do you get 120+ up votes for something that can't survive even a few moments of critical thought?) Look below for a response of mine to the article that was deleted and replaced with the current text for one example of duplicate precinct numbers, and a link to the page explaining how to interpret the twitter data submitted by the precinct chairs.
I see now. That makes perfect sense.
Why he isn't showing the county or county number is a mystery, I must say.
bogus + bogus = truth?
Now that you mention it I see that "doctor" K is STILL posting the precinct numbers without the county name or number. So instead of learning anything from the first mistake, the one that caused him to delete the article in haste, he's repeating that mistake and compounding it with analysis that makes elementary statistical mistakes!
Oh, gawd. Looking even more closely at this I see that "doctor" K is STILL making the bogus claim from the deleted article! Search for "7532" to see where he posts it here, and then keep searching for "7532" in the comments and you'll find my reply explaining why it's bogus. There are TWO precincts numbered "7532", one in Clark and one in Washoe.
In case "doctor" K gets the idea of deleting the embarrassing part again, here's what it says as of now:
And for convenience, here's the key part of my reply from below:
Someone below posted two tweets showing vote counts:
https://twitter.com/#!/NVVoteCount/status/166131424766861312
R 03 7532 GIN 4 PAU 4 ROM 4 SAN 0 NOV 0 (1/1)
https://twitter.com/#!/NVVoteCount/status/166104864097701888
C 16 7532 GIN 13 PAU 4 ROM 17 SAN 6 NOV 0 (1/1)
You can see more that have "7532" in them as well:
https://twitter.com/#!/search/nvvotecount%207532
How to interpret these?
https://dev.twitter.com/docs/special-events/nvvotecount-twee...
The first character is "R" for results, "C" for correction, and other possible codes.
Of course, 7532 is the precinct number. What is the "03" and "16"? That's the county. 03 is Clark. 16 is Washoe.
Why is it there? The precinct number is not unique in Nevada. Each county numbers their own precincts however they want. Here's a list that shows a 7532 precinct in Clark:
http://www.clarkcountynv.gov/Depts/election/Documents/Report...
Here's a page where you can verify that there's a precinct 7532 in Washoe:
http://www.co.washoe.nv.us/voters/precinct_district_maps.htm
The vote totals for Clark were 4/4/4/0.
The vote totals for Washoe were 13/4/16/6.
Two Flaws
1. Trust it or not, the media does exit polling, so even though there may only be a small percentage reporting, the news outlets can compare that to their entry or exit polling and decide how accurate it is and then ball park what the results of unreported precincts could be. And if you have a double digit lead, it's easy to call. Compare it to (and you can agree or disagree with the results, I'm not arguing that)Nevada where all night they talked about the race for 2nd was too close to call.
2. I would expect that precincts that favored Paul would show up on some message board more often than ones that didn't. Obviously most of us are die hard. That means we're going to drag a few friends with us, blanket our neighborhood, give an impassioned speech and run straight home and post our results. I assume many of the precincts that have not been and may never be posted have totals on average less favorable for RP than the statistics that you are reporting.
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams
Exactly
We know that none of the precincts where Ron Paul got zero votes ran home to report that result here.
What a good idea! Maybe we should be reporting results on Romney forums--oh, no, wait, there won't be anyone there.
You can reach voters in California, here: http://consequeries.com/California-voter-guide.php
Not just the ones with zero votes
The lower the number of Paul votes, the less likely it is that someone would post the results on DP or other pro-Paul forums. The more supporters who witness the results, the more likely it is that one or more of them will post. That's what selection bias looks like.
Damn, It Would have Help
Shucks, that would have been great to get some result from the Romney forums to post, that would have help a lot.
REVELATION Chapter 13