104 votes

The Judge with Rand on What Happened to Ron Paul's Vote in Nevada

(these graphs look awfully similar!)

http://youtu.be/RtZfKfaqczE




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Not sure if it was the end of the interview

Not sure if it was the end of the interview or not. It may have been and he allowed Rand to finish as much as he could before commercial. Though it seemed by his response (called him Congressmen at first instead of Sen.) that he was distracted by Rand's answer, producers telling him to go to commercial or they cut the interview unusually short.

Jeremy D Hoover
Please check usnotes.net for more
"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers." - Thomas Jefferson

I was taken aback.

I was surprised at how short this part of the interview was. Especially after the Judge promoted the fact on Facebook that Rand would answer "What happened in Nevada?" This was a let down.

I think it was just a matter of poor time planning by the Judge or his producers. It is very common for the Judge to say "Got it," when he wants to signal to a guest that their time is up.

They seem to be on a very tight time budget and want to fit a lot in so guests are not allowed much time. It was just unfortunate that it had to be just when I was hoping Rand would shed some light on the subject of Nevada.

I look at it the other way

You don't want to press him on this issue - he can't exactly elaborate without coming right out and accusing Nevada of fraud - which would be a big problem for him. So the judge just leaves it as a parting shot - the last thing people hear. That's what people remember - and the seed has been planted.

I'm pretty sure the judge was

I'm pretty sure the judge was getting yelled at in his ear mic...."WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING?? CORPORATE IS GOING INSANE RIGHT NOW OFF OFF!!!"

No way. You must not watch

No way. You must not watch his show much. Everybody needs to stop the paranoid conspiracy crap. It doesn't help.

I created my own graph

I created my own graph including the results from last night(MN only reporting 95.2%). Maybe he's just fizzling out where we expected him to excel?

http://www.krythis.com/frontierskydivers/files/images/RP_08_...

There's No Way That He's Fizzling Out!!

Have you seen the crowds that he attacks at his speeches. It' standing room only and out the door. He has more supporters now who are wakeing up to his messages. He has received more MSM exposure than, past elections due to the debates. But, we know overall the least amount of time to speak at the debates.

Oh, their definately was fraud involved. We should of had a plan in place to combat this problem. The Causus are intentional flawed. And, they passed legislation to cover themselves by being labeled as "A Private Party". So, they make the rules and they can change them at anytime and not be held liable. Some free election process that we have here in the U.S..

So i am supposed to believe

He is fizzling out when Nationally for the first time he is polling second coupled with all the polls lately that have showed him having the best chance to beat Obama ?
Sorry but it just doesn't make sense. None of this does.

"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams

Excellent!

Thank you!

"A little worried about it"?

"A little worried about it"? Really, "A little"? Why not "deeply concerned"? This is what I am so tired of. This mealy mouth approach from the campaign. They just don't seem like they really care about winning, especially Rand and Jessee and Doug. Prove me wrong.

Sorry, but the Judge cut Rand off

This was at the end and he was going to say more, but it is clear he was cut off.

This Is Just The

End of the interview folks!!

buddy

What the hell is this?

What the hell is this? Where's the outrage!?

'I think they're surprised'
'Got it' thank you goodbye

That was bizarre. No one

That was bizarre. No one would choose to plan an interview that awkwardly short. I can't help but wonder if either Rand had to leave immediately or if the Judge was told to cut the interview immediately.

Judge cut him off mid

Judge cut him off mid sentence with 'got it' so I'm assuming he either had a hard stop or was told the interview needed to end. Rand looked like he wanted to continue.

Well

one things for sure. I really hope we haven't heard the last of this but if you don't have the nuts to say or do anything about the Establishment and their obvious Fraud and Trickery how can you ever expect to beat the machine?
Isn't standing up to the corruption and the machine where it all starts anyway? If you are being robbed and you refuse to defend yourself you are only opening the door for more abuse. Its just the way it is...beat them or they will beat you by any means necessary!
Somebody needs to get these guys some new Teabags because obviously theirs are all used up and running on empty...

"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams

Well Said

I wrote the following response to another Daily Paul member two days ago on another thread:

I strongly believe that it is not only counterproductive but very destructive to the future of our nation when Paul supporters refuse to get "absolutely side-ways angry at the [obvious] suppression of their votes." The criminal behavior will never stop if the primary goal of too many Paul supporters is to "look presentable or 'mature' to 'polite' society" (I'm 51, by the way). I agree with that sentiment in most social situations, but not when it comes to exposing fraud.

I have found it very refreshing and invigorating to see that the majority of Daily Paul members who commented on the Nevada Caucus Results & Open Thread have joined me in my outrage. Having studied election fraud extensively since 2004, I knew full well what was coming in 2012, and I feared that most Paul supporters would not question any election-night anomalies, even when they clearly resembled obvious fraud. However, the general outrage here at Daily Paul over the Nevada GOP's unacceptable and all-too-obviously sneaky behavior has brightened my day. I no longer feel so lonely in my long-standing outrage.

you know the judge was grilled for this ..

God bless the judge for knowing his job is second to liberty

The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?

That was just bizarre. Why was Rand cut off - is that all the

judge had to say about it?

I'm guessing

that there is probably some pressure behind the scenes from the GOP, that if anybody rocks the boat too much, Ron will be thrown out of the GOP, and the race. And that might extend to Rand too.

Remember, political parties use exortion and coercion as part of their every day activity. It is silly to think they aren't twisting people's arms with threats behind the scenes.
They most certainly are, and I don't need to see it to know it.

so what! Rand needs to stop

so what! Rand needs to stop worrying about his future and worry more about election fraud!

For all you people out there

that are not convinced there was fraud in NV: How do you argue with that chart?

Well

There are a few arguments one could make if so inclined such as, "Shit happens" or "the turnout in 2012 is way down from 2008" or, "the vote was divided more ways this year than last in NV." I'm not sure why the judge cut Rand off, probably the producers of the show/network telling him to cut to commercial. Rand seems like a good guy who is playing the game. He knows that as a US Senator he must keep some semblance of "establishment marketability" or they'll toss him next election. I'm not sure if Rand is the guy to inherit Ron Paul's flock and message, either.

WTF

That's it? Looks like the judge asked the question and didn't give Rand time to say anything! Is the judge now in on the Fix News bs or what ? Very important question and the judge cuts him short?....whatever...

"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams

yea... but I dont think that was apart of his script

I think the judge kinda pulled a fast one on fox here... not the other way around

The role of a farmer, in Fukuoka's mind, is an observer, not an intervener, of the natural order in his/her particular landscape. How is that any different than Hayek in regards to Economics?

I sure

hope your right. That does make sense but why ask the question if your not gonna give time for the answer?

"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams

I watch the Judges show regularly

and that is just his style with everyone when he is up against a commercial break. Not supporting it, just pointing it out

Can someone clarify this

for me. In 2008 the republicans put votes in a safe and didn't count them until recently. What does that mean. Is Rand saying there is actually election fraud in Nevavda and they have been caught?

He got it mixed up or was sensationalizing.

The votes they didn't count and put in a safe was from the state convention where we were kicking establishment @$$ and sweeping all the national delegates.

The state convention occurred MONTHS after the caucus vote though.

I think he was just trying to make a point.