Massive Evidence of Vote Fraud In Nevada (video)
Submitted by emalvini on Wed, 02/08/2012 - 08:54Massive Evidence of Vote Fraud In Nevada (video)
The beneficiary of these recurring vote counting “mistakes” always seems to be Mitt Romney
http://www.infowars.com/massive-evidence-of-vote-fraud-in-ne...
















Here's the book he quoted at the end.
http://www.ldsfreedomnetwork.com/none-dare-call-it-conspirac...
--------------------------------------
The Law
by Frédéric Bastiat
http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html#SECTION_G001
http://twitter.com/#!/swifty_s
http://www.youtube.com/user/swiftysmithuk
No Massive Evidence in that cited Video
Only part of the vid pertains to the Nev caucuses.
The part that does simply rehashes the non-evidence that has been already purported to be evidence here.
First are the results from the special night caucus, which was packed with RP supporters who were called. The calls said that any Repub who missed out on caucusing early in the day could participate, not just religious participants. That vote was a big RP win, 58%. But somehow, the newsreader thought that ONE caucus result should be a representative sample of every one of the other 1800+ precincts. Sorry, that ain't possible.
Then we see screenshots of people crying voter fraud on the examiner.com. Sorry, that ain't evidence.
The we see the infamous Ron Paul vote count chart, the one that shows all previous caucus/primary raw vote totals for RP compared 2008 to 2012. The fact that the RP raw vote total was only up by a fraction is somehow "proof" of voter/election fraud. Nevermind that Nevada turnout was down by about 25% for 2012 as compared to 2008, and nevermind that RP's % of all ballots cast, 18.8%, went UP in 2012 compared to 13.7% in 2008.
Sorry, no "massive evidence" of vote fraud here.
Those crying vote fraud have the burden of proof---you will have to produce the smoking gun.
If someone could prove fraud
by, perhaps finding someone who would admit the guilt, this could literally blow the roof off for Ron Paul. But short of that, it'll be ancient history next week. Just remember the crazy antics that the GOP pulled on Paul last election in 08. They shut down the caucuses because of too much Ron Paul support! Why does the campaign not prepared for this? I just don't get it.
alan laney
My suggestion...
... the campaign needs to offer a $100,000 reward for anyone who can produce incontestable evidence of official voting fraud. A $100,000 reward would be too much for some to resist. Currently, there is no incentive for anyone involved to blow the whistle.
With such evidence, the Paul campaign could slap a $20 million lawsuit on the GOP.
Plano TX
It's a shame common decency isn't enough to compel people
.