Ron Paul Campaign Statement: There was no voter fraud in Nevada"

that Paul's campaign issued that statement for the soul purpose of moving on simply because they can not prove there was fraud so its a waste of time for them. I believe without a doubt from the circumstantial evidence i have seen and witnessed that there was indeed fraud against Paul in Nevada!
I will go on to say as corrupt as the GOP is there has more than likely been fraud in every state so far....you seriously think these scoundrels are playing fair?
Don't make me laugh.....

Does anyone know where or with whom I can check the results of a precinct in Iowa? I volunteered there before the caucus and observed at one precinct, but when I tried calling in to report the results to the number I'd been given for the RP Iowa campaign, it was first busy that night and the following day when I tried again, and then later when I called it had been disconnected. I'd still like to go back and check whether the tallies I took that night match up with what was officially reported.

Also, can anyone recommend a good site with a balanced, factual account of the evidence for fraud in various states (Iowa, Nevada, Maine)? There's nothing more frustrating than to have these rumors going around when they seem credible but lack thorough substantiation.

For instance, I've heard that there were exit polls in Iowa showing Ron Paul winning. Certainly the supporters I spoke with before the vote were expecting him to do better, partly because polls of "likely GOP voters" were more likely to exclude crossover independent and Democrat voters supporting Ron Paul. Then there's this story on this page of a "hacktivist" guy (who? name?) posing as an RP supporter and convincing GOP officials to hold the vote count at a secret location, despite his being arrested(?) for protesting *against* Paul. But I was also told that the campaign knew about the secure vote location and would have representatives there monitoring the count. How much of this is true? Of course we all know about the screw-up(?) that had Iowa officials first declaring Romney the victor and then later saying it was actually Santorum.

I've heard that there were many precincts in Clark County, Nevada, where votes were not counted (why not?), and that Ron Paul was expected to win, based on his victory in one precinct that was filmed by the media due to voting taking place at an unusual time for Jews who couldn't vote on the regular caucus day due to it falling on the Sabbath or something. Given Paul's lack of pandering on support for Israel, it does seem logical that if he can win among a group of observant Jews, that he should have done as well or better among other voters in that county. How much of this is true?

And now this story about the vote in Washington County, Maine, being cancelled due to mostly non-existent snow, when Ron Paul was expected to win enough votes there to give him a victory in the state. True? If so, where are the polling numbers or other data to back this up?

It does seem to me that there are just way too many suspicious happenings for it to all be on the up-and-up, but spreading stories of fraud without having solid evidence may not help us, even if there really was fraud. That of course is the dilemma.

I'm tired of the campaign telling us to back down.

I'm tired of the campaign telling us to not trust our instincts.

Before Iowa voted, MANY supporters here on the DP were talking and formulating plans to closely watch the voting sites to prevent fraud. Days before Iowa voted, the campaign released a statement saying to not worry about that, things were being handled.

Despite Paul's awesome polling numbers before Iowa voted, he ended up with third place and NUMEROUS reports that something fishy was going on in Iowa.

Why do I get the feeling the campaign KNOWS fraud is going on, but is deliberately dissuading us?

Does it makes Paul's campaign look bad in front of the MSM to speculate on voter fraud?

Has the campaign been hijacked?

Something's not right...

To all those doubting that fraud took place: RE THINK THAT NOW.

Read this article, watch the video, and spread like wildfire.

http://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/newsmax-acciden...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMYgOaTEezQ

Turns out, AP accidentally printed a story titled
"Romney Wins Nevada in Quiet Caucus" TWO DAYS BEFORE THE CAUCUS TOOK PLACE.

The caucus was certainly not quiet. And it wasn't written in innocent anticipation because how could they have known for certain it would be Romney?? Paul was positioned to make it a battle if not landslide.

=RIGGED

they mean: no solid evidence of voter fraud.

that's a big difference from "no voter fraud"

I've spoken with the campaign twice now in the last few days about Nevada. Call them up and ask about Nevada.

Headquarters Phone (Toll-Free): 1-855-886-9779

They have a legal team checking into it and weighing options.

I'm not sure why Bunce said that other than that was a quick statement.

Edit: The second call was made today BTW and I got the same answer.

I suggest doubters and people who are holding up Bunce's statements, call for themselves.

Where did he come from? Can he be trusted?