56 votes

*NEW* IPSOS Poll: Mitt 28% Ron 22% Newt/Rick 16% among Independents+Republicans




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More importantly

He is running second among just republicans as well I think that is some of the biggest news especially since we have been relying heavily on independents and democrats switching for the primaries.

RedDot's picture

He's doing better in this one

He's doing better in this one I just found liked from Drudge:

http://www.dailypaul.com/212490/look-whos-polling-best-again...

↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓
Show your support for Ron Paul and inspire others at new grassroots site:
http://www.ronpaulpatriotnation.com
( Consider uploading a picture or video of your sign or event, etc .)

why not

why not put Paul vs Obama ?

----------------------------
Dr.Ron Paul's 2002 Predictions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

Romney is Obama - DONT vote for more of the same!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38

The trend is our friend

never put much stock in a single piece of data but the chart says lower left to the upper right..yea baby!!

Government is supposed to protect our freedom, our property, our privacy, not invade it. Ron Paul 2007

and Mitts numbers from 08 to 12

People watch polls

ESPECIALLY if they are undecided or think their candidate isn't "popular" enough. We've only had a few states to vote so far. A national poll showing Paul as the most popular "not-Romney" before Super Tuesday could be HUGE!

Remember the mob mentality. "I like this guy because he's popular." In this case, Mr. Popular is also Mr. Right!

not really

You think the TV is gonna show this poll? you think the 65 year old ignorant retarded pathetic sheep that sit on their ass and watch FOX news all day will hear about this poll? Its these people that go out and vote...

isn't that a sad thing...the dumbest people in the country are the ones that vote..

ron paul 2012

Actually

They did have this poll on Fox News, when Ron Paul did an interview with Cavuto. I'm not saying that everyone will have seen it, but it was there.

Billy Jack's picture

The truth hurts

The truth hurts

Cos Cob, CT

The problem is that there

The problem is that there will be no national media outlets reporting these #'s so how do we tell everyone, especially the people that don't use the internet...!?

I dont know if anyone mentioned this...

BUT... This is a national poll.... Which means for every state we get single digits in... there are states we will be in the 30+%...

An absurd poll with flawed methodology.

But still nice to see.

Oh yeah, and it's completely useless because there is no national primary.

This poll does not allow people to answer their party affiliation. It attempts to force people into the left-right paradigm. This is a flawed assumption that will give inaccurate results.

Furthermore, there is little basis for comparison in the poll if the head to head match up does not include all FOUR GOP candidates. The absence of Paul and Santorum on that question shows the pollster is biased and attempting to make it look like they are gathering statistically meaningful data, when in fact, they are simply using that as a ruse to publish slanted information in an attempt to unlawfully influence the election.

At the very least, any outlet which publishes this data or any analysis of it that does not chastise IPSOS/Reuters for their flawed methodology, should be sanctioned at the least if not taken to court on criminal charges.

I've had enough with this bullshit from pollsters and media outlet collusion.

It is long past time to throw the book at them, then lock them under the jail and throw away the key. Maybe NDAA the bastards while we're at it.

thanks for the heads up

I've commented on other polls before and in particular when people try to use crosstabs on small samples. It is just not doable. The error bars are just insanely large. And people really need to keep in mind that not all pollsters are created equally and even the good ones sometimes have bad results (not necessarily intentionallyl.)

There is a lot more to a poll than just reading the top line result. You have to look at the methodology - who were contact, how, how many, how were the demographics split and are they representative, etc. Most times you wont't get a fraction of what you need to see to 'believe' in a poll.

Nate Silver @538 developed a system which evaluated the pollsters overall and state by state, race by race to try to determine which are good and which are bad. He then uses this in his own modeling of races.

Its not easy stuff even when done right.

gedankenexperiment.dk views on finance, politics and science

You're spitting in the wind here

These are folks who saw the SC poll with Paul at 20% and said "how can he be so low? It must be a way to cover up vote fraud!". And of course it was an outlier on the HIGH side.

I evaluated just independents

I evaluated just independents and Paul does best at 26%, more than 3 times Santorum.

R P S G
29 21 18 19 %
116 84 72 76 400

28 22 16 16 %
140 110 80 80 500

24 26 8 4 100

Watch in amazement as Ron

Watch in amazement as Ron Paul's magical ceiling rises once again towards 25%!

Too late, he got 27% in Minnesota. I guess his "ceiling" is now

at least 30%.

Guess what happens when it reaches 50% +1?

Jinc's picture

Ron Paul polls at 100%

among 2 voters in my house. We just need more & bigger RP households.

According to reuters national poll

the other day we were 8 points behind Rmoney. Guess we are closing the gap :)

Mathew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.

IngotNews.com's picture

Same Poll

It's the same poll - this is just the results, including independents as well.

Oh..

Oops

Mathew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.

Isn't it amazing how RP can

Isn't it amazing how RP can poll 20%+ nationally yet not come even close to winning any states. Santorum polls less yet sweeps the last 3 caucuses...

Such obvious fraud going on.

It's the polls....

that are fraudulent.

Minnesota Mary

National polls are meaningless.

It is quite possible all or even none of Santorum's support in this poll came from the 3 states he won.

These types of polls are no basis for comparison of anything.

It's like looking up the "average global temperature" over the last week to decide if you need to wear a jacket or shorts when leaving the house a month from now. Completely MEANINGLESS for ANY purpose.

IngotNews.com's picture

I put together a graph and caption

Hi all, I put together a quick graph and article concerning the poll to help get it out there. Feel free to spread it!

http://ingotnews.com/post/17291151611/ron-paul-pulls-into-2n...

.

Actually, it's the same poll released Tuesday.

...

Among 400 Republicans only:

Romney-29; Paul-21; Gingrich-19; Santorum-18

...

Among 400 Republicans and 100 Independents:

Romney-28; Paul-22; Gingrich-16; Santorum-16

We need 100 people to send this to Drudge Report

posting on Twitter.

Website:
http://www.libertypoet.com/
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
“The most important element of a free society, where individual rights are held in the highest esteem, is the rejection of the initiation of violence.” Dr. Ron Paul

yes

yes

This is the second national poll...

...in as many days. Something is happening out there. Is Ron's surge finally coming?

it'll come and then...

they will release another newsletter blurb.