-24 votes

Super PAC supporting Ron Paul is operated by a 9/11 'truther'

You just got to check this out from MS NBC...it appers as a hit job..I don't know.

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/09/10358155-s...




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I think this is good news

maybe people will start to question 9-11 and everything that has happened since then.

Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.

So I'm A NeoCon Troll, Huh?

Does this sound like the writing of a NeoCon or a Troll?

http://911blogger.com/news/2006-09-23/911-press-truth-local-...

The links have been deleted sometime in the past by ImageShack. As I wrote in a previous comment in this thread, when I have that computer back, I will post the newspaper clipping. I also under-approximated the homes reached, which was more accurately 10,000+. The troll/agent/idiot guy in that link saying I'm a Fetzer hater, he's ALL over the next thread about Fetzer (next link,) along with a couple other trolls/agents/idiots such as the Peggy person.

I was the FIRST person at 911 Blogger who called out former Bush admin member turned 9/11 "truther" Morgan Reynolds as a disinfo agent (I can't find the thread, it might have been deleted.) At the time, NO ONE was wanting to believe me. Then, a few months later, after Morgan Reynolds had further showed his disinfo hand (promoting HOLOGRAMS AND NO PLANES AT THE WTC,) what I had tried pointing out was realised as undeniable fact amongst most of the 9/11 truth community. And the Morgan Reynolds' purposeful disinfo self implosion occured shortly thereafter. Complete bullsh*t disinfo agent FROM the Bush admin.

I was the FIRST person at 911 Blogger to call out University of Minnesota professor Jim Fetzer as being a disinfo fraud. Read the thread here: http://911blogger.com/news/2006-09-25/easily-showing-jim-fet... One of the most crucial images in that thread has been deleted by ImageShack sometime in the past. What it showed was the Pentagon the day after 9/11, and what the real airline impact damage was. It was a high-resolution, daylight, unobscurred fairly close up photograph of the Pentagon impact zone, showing wood supports holding up the almost collapsed section where the left wing/engine impacted and smashed through the reinforced wall.

I found that picture at the United States Air Force official website, sometime in approximately 2005. That picture, and ALL other images from that set (which were quite revealing and destroyed the no plane at the Pentagon disinfo) have been completely deleted from publicly accessed .mil Air Force servers and completely scrubbed from Google's Wayback Machine.

Guess what Fetzer went on to promote (in his purposeful disinfo self destruction?) HE WENT FROM NO PLANE AT THE PENTAGON, TO HOLOGRAMS AND NO PLANES AT THE WTC, SAYING THAT THE WTC COLLAPSES/DEMOLITIONS WERE FROM SPACE LASER WEAPONS. Complete bullsh*t disinfo and completely purposeful. I called that POS out before ANYONE else. I would show you more links and comments of mine from 911 Blogger, but the search feature won't search my screen name: http://i.imgur.com/IYtwf.jpg

Here is a good reply in that thread about Fetzer, from a 911 Blogger user in 2011:

"Look at ugly attacks on this thread and no one answers for Fetzer's inaccuracies. And look at the juvenile attacks coming from the people insisting there was no plane at the pentagon. It's very clear what Fetzer turned out to be. We need to learn from these experiences in the movement. Sorry to bring back an old thread, but it speaks to the pentagon discussions that have been going on lately as well as how hurtful and divisive dis-information can be to the 9/11 truth movement."

I haven't used 911 Blogger for years. That website essentially crumbled, in my opinion, mostly from purposeful disinfo dissemination and nonsense spewing, divisive agents and trolls. I think that 911 Blogger might have been a purposeful crumbling, as in, it was a community not owned and operated by honest persons, and was meant to be infiltrated, destroyed and ultimately cause a disbanding, dispersal and failure. I wasn't really paying close attention to it the past 5 years (2007-2012,) so I can't say for certain. But that's what I suspect.

I have been paying attention to 9/11 truth (and 9/11 "truth") since 2003. And as I said, the 9/11 "truth" movement isn't going anywhere (that's the point of it - failure) and neither will the freedom/Ron Paul movements if you actively try mixing them with 9/11 "truth." If you promote holograms and no planes at the Pentagon or WTC, you're either purposely lying, have been conned to believe that nonsense, and/or have no idea what you're talking about. Twoofers, troofers, whatever you choose to call them, are just that. What they're saying isn't truth, so it's twoof or troof. You aren't a real 9/11 truther if what you're promoting isn't truth.

Me, a NeoCon Troll?! LOL! Hilarious! BigT, you're an idiot!

Ron Paul will win 2012. Get ready for it. :)

ecliptic's picture

our criminal government

... spent 140 million to investigate Bill Clinton's blowjob.

- versus -

~ 3 million and change to investigate 911.

»»» http://riseforliberty.com/ «««

Isn't it funny that "truther" has now

become a bad word. How about a 9-11 Liars supporter? Ohhh watch out.......I tink I saw a taliban.

alan laney

Billy Jack's picture

It would be funny if the vast

It would be funny if the vast majority of dopes in this country didn't fall for it.

How come they didn't go with Truthist, or Birthist...like Conspiracy Theorist?

Cos Cob, CT

a-piece-of-the-remnant's picture

Weak minded losers can't handle the truth

It takes a strong mind. Thank God there are some of us who can handle the truth, and will fight for it our entire lives.

ecliptic's picture

Thank you

... for those words. I am soooooooooo sick of the honorable word "Truth" being used as a pejorative... words cannot describe my anger . . .

»»» http://riseforliberty.com/ «««

a-piece-of-the-remnant's picture

John 8:44 - Jesus talks about Truth

(The Devil) has always hated the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, it is consistent with his character; for he is a liar and the father of lies.

How can you not be a

How can you not be a "truther" if you are into economics, or being fiscally sound- when you learn that 2.3 Trillion dollars was announced "missing" by the Pentagon the day before the biggest blunder in their history.

That's 5 years Pentagon budget at the time combined.

Total cost of Iraq War: 800 Billion (that we're told about)

Yeah ...

... there go those "round Earther's" again.

I can't wait till they try and sail out too far. Then they'll all fall off the edge into the void where they belong.

Tin-foil hat wearing idiots, all of em.

Thank god he's

ecliptic's picture

have you heard

... the one about the 19 Saudi "terrorists" who, armed only with box-cutter knives, managed to defeat the multi-trillion dollar US military and fly around US airspace unchallenged for 90+ minutes?

Who actually believes this shit???

»»» http://riseforliberty.com/ «««

ecliptic's picture

I support Gary Franchi

I'm a proud "truther". Anyone who attempts to use the term "truther" as a pejorative is itching for a fight... and when any lame-stream media liars attempt this it only accentuates their lies and makes them even more of a joke!

Core of Corruption ( 10:55 trailer )
http://vimeo.com/14930000
http://coreofcorruption.com/

A Noble Lie ( 1:36 trailer )
http://vimeo.com/33435167
http://www.anoblelie.com/

»»» http://riseforliberty.com/ «««

Only a propagandist

Can take a word as beautiful as "truth" and twist into something to be hated and scorned.

Too Much Evidence Now

There's just too much evidence that supports foul play.

It's like Obama's Birth Certificate... obviously fake, just waiting on the process and public support.

estanislao

It is a very telling

It is a very telling indictment of our society that the phrase "9/11 truth" is a pejorative

It's sick, isn't it?

But unfortunately, to be expected. People tend to know when their beliefs are faulty, but rather than change their POV through research, they remain willfully ignorant (not just with 9/11).

It's basically sticking one's fingers in their ears and going LALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU.

A signature used to be here!

Whatever

Whatever. Your "expose" just shows what Ron has said is true: Freedom brings people together. For this purpose or for that purpose, someone wants truth. You want it for "this" and that person wants it for "that." The environment truth is attained in is freedom. But thanks for playing. Have a nice ride home. Bye.

School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of learning. -Me

What?

Don't shoot the messenger.

A signature used to be here!

What a What

As a gambler does to a gambler on suspicion of a bluff, he says "I call you." Well, I don't call you, but I do what your what. "Don't shoot the messenger"? What??

School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of learning. -Me

NANOTHERMITE- Nuff-said..... Except....

Gary has my full support and endorsement!

A patriot must always be prepared to defend his country from his government.

I sure hope he is!

I'd like to think all RP supporters are too smart to accept the fairy tale spun by those supposed to be protecting us for their massive failure (or was it success?) on 9/11. Maybe someday they'll give us an explanation for bldg 7 which imploded without any plane ever hitting it.
SSsssshhhhh...mustn't speak truth...or you'll be called a "truther"! Down is up.....

I agree

So true. Down is up.

ecliptic's picture

that's thought crime

The Ministry of Truth has issued an alert over Skynet on this ...

War IS peace

Freedom IS slavery

Strength through UNity . . .

Your monetary credits have been removed from your World ID. Go directly to the nearest FEMA camp and turn yourself in for re-education immediately. You are hereby declared ETS:

"Enemy of The State"

»»» http://riseforliberty.com/ «««

And Gingrich's super pac

was funded by Adelson who has now stabbed Gingrich in the back and is supporting Romney.

Why is that OK?

There is no denying that 9/11 ("a new Pearl Harbor", as PNAC so elegantly refers to such an event) changed this country forever.

Why must we ignore the elephant in the room?

“The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.” Ron Paul - The Revolution

You know you're over the

You know you're over the target when you start taking the flak. Good job Gary and rEVOLution PAC!

Blessings )o(

Notice how this thread

dragged the anti-truth trolls out of the woodwork, and now they are trying to poke a knife in the back of Ron's Super-Pac.

It doesn't take much to see that these people are anti-RP.

bullsh*t

You do understand that users who post supportive Ron Paul comments, who then post comments about no planes, holograms, etc. are the real anti-truth trolls? You're intelligent enough to understand that, correct? Please don't tell me you're too stupid to understand that.

In 2006, I had my local newspaper publish a highly visible editorial comment for me that was pro-911 truth (in regard to the film 9/11: Press for Truth.) This was published on the 5th anniversary of 9/11. The newspaper at that time had a readership of 20,000+. When I have that computer back, I will post the clipping.

The previous commenters in this thread who have posted about no planes, holograms, etc. are troofers or any other insulting name you choose to call them. I say cull them. They're divisive to the freedom movements, and they're divisive and ultimately destructive to Ron Paul's campaign, and viewed by most as idiots.

Anyone who posts at the DailyPaul about no plane at the Pentagon, holograms, no planes at the WTC, etc. is either: [a] Purposely lying. [b] Has been conned by liars, and are just repeating what has been told to them that they believe. [c] Shouldn't be involved in any matters of politics or world events, both foreign and domestic.

Terrorists are real. Al Qaeda (whichever way you want to spell the name) wasn't some fictional entity. To say or think otherwise is idiocy at best, and retardation at worst. Is the U.S. government (Bush admin) version of events, and the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, an honest, complete and factually correct account? No. Not by any means!

Was 9/11 an inside job? Yes, in part. A major part, I conclude (after years of research!) But because a commenter attacks or doesn't agree with a nonsense spouting 9/11 twoofer idiot doesn't mean the attacker or disagreer is a troll or somehow anti-Paul. A plane hit the Pentagon, two planes hit the towers, and there were no holograms.

This comment was not in defense of ANY other commenters in this thread - who might be trolls - who commented in attacks or disagreement about 9/11 idiocy, either new comments or in reply.

Ron Paul will win 2012. Get ready for it. :)

Dr.K.Research's picture

Liars, trolls, cursing, twoofers, plenty of mud-slinging

Now, the whole world knows building 7 was imploded by wired charges at 5:30 p.m.

By the way when in the entire history of plane crashes has there been a crash without massive plane wreckage? Give one example if you will.

Those 47 Steel Columns of tempered Japanese steel. How did those come down, without massive use of cutter charges, nanothermite, or other explosive ordinances? After all, we have the vivid example of WTC 7 as an example.

And which "part" of 9-11 was an inside job and which wasn't, if you have those facts with all that "intensive" study?

Is it possible to discuss this without slandering people? And how does free discussion of any issue "harm" a presidential campaign? Isn't there something called the 1st Amendment?

Okay

You're a Pro-contributor to the DailyPaul. That's good. You're trying to combine controlled demolition of the towers and #7, with no planes and holograms. That's not good. I hadn't said anything about CD of the towers and #7. Why write a reply, about my having attacked the holograms and no planes bullsh*t, trying to infer I somehow argue against CD of the towers and #7? You're trying to combine them. That's suspicious. And there is no way I'm writing a detailed explanation about what I believe the truth of the 9/11 attacks is. I wouldn't have even wrote any reply if you weren't a Pro-contributor. You help support this site, so you deserve that much. The 9/11 "truth" movement isn't going anywhere, and the same will happen to this freedom/Ron Paul movement if you try to actively mix them. Is it okay to talk about 9/11 at the DailyPaul? Yeah, in most respects. Is it okay to promote holograms and no planes bullsh*t? No!

Ron Paul will win 2012. Get ready for it. :)