Win New Voters Easily with Dr. Paul's Health Freedom
Submitted by Dr.K.Research on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 13:27Additional benefits of a Paul Presidency, from the Desk of Dr. Cass Ingram, full-time health freedom advocate:
Health Freedom, a system of health care by Dr. Ron Paul, is far superior to all other platforms. Unlike ObamaCare and RomneyCare, it won't bankrupt or rob the treasury, because it is based on free markets. This is based on freedom of access to a more wide range of health-enhancing modalities. Thus, the benefits of this plan will be immense, as follows:
* reduce costs of all medical care due to increased competition
* allow for legitimate, true health claims on dietary supplements
* eliminate of drug monopoly on health care, which will also lower costs
* eliminate unconstitutional forced vaccine policies
* allowance for the public vote: re freedom to sell and transport raw milk and label GMOs
* eliminate unconstitutional raids against natural medicine companies by federal agents
* improve the quality of health care by freeing up the free market and increasing innovation
* increasing the availability of natural, preventive, and herbal medicine by reducing the powers of the federal government to attack and undermine alternative care
* give people the right to choose the type of medical care they desire
* opening up the availability and use of alternative methods for cancer and other major diseases
Note: all these needless, politically motivated attacks and prosecutions by federal police/agencies are both destructive and expensive. Usually, it is small, privately-held companies which are undermined, the very basis of a healthy economy. Eliminating this draconian federal policing can only improve the quality of health care, while increasing the available options for care. By following Dr. Paul's system of adherence to the Constitution freedom of access to all that is good for human health will for the first time in history become institutionalized.
Note: you may spread this far and wide. Any comments are welcomed for adding to and upgrading this list. For a copy of a professionally produced newsletter called Health Freedom: The Dr. Ron Paul System in newsletter format, email me at drkresearch@hotmail.com. Or send me your address: I'll send you some to pass out.
Read more, here: http://healthfreedom2012.com/HFblog/2012/02/13/paul-care-rev... see exclusively RP videos: www.healthfreedom2012.com
BUMP!
Let all new people know!For Liberty!For all the new people just looking this man is the real deal for us!
President Ron Paul!
Freedom to Choose or Freedom to Create?
PaulCare is based on freedom of choice....
A reminder, everyone:
We've all heard the phrase "freedom of choice" many times for a long, long time. But that phrase is injustice to freedom because choice is second to creation.
Let us create our lives instead of choosing, choosing being a reaction, not an initiality.
For too long a time has freedom of choice been uttered. And so few times has what it derives from -- freedom to create -- been said. So few times, I recall no public person saying it.
1 therefore 2
action therefore reaction
create therefore choose
Let's sew up the space. That phrase can be refined. Let's refine it. Let's say it as often or more often than the second place phrase. Let's recognize and be first place. Let's be free to create: Let's be free.
School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of learning. -Me
You have a good point
It might be superior to say freedom to have "access" to the various modalities. I like the point. Changes noted above.
...first time in history
...first time in history become institutionalized.
Institutionalized? So, natural medicine would exchange places with today's practices? In other words, the structure (not to be confused with the players) remains and its contents change?
Because if so, sharpen your dollar stretching skills to buy that orange or banana or green pepper or turmeric root. Institutionalizing a modality consituted or construed as natural, let alone institutionalizing food, is a good idea? This proposal has ramifications and they are deep and wide.
Did you mean to use a word other than institutionalizing?
School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of learning. -Me
There may well be a better word
but institutionalized describes it to a degree, that it would be possible for natural medicine to be in the institutions, where it is now banned. Institutionalized does not mean replace, though. It means to "incorporate into" a structure or facility: an institutional system, like the hospitals and doctors clinics.
It does mean replace nor mandate. Will check the dict. if there is a better word.
The word Institutionalize
That's right, institutionalize doesn't mean replace. But the placement of natural remedies in institutions operating in the framework in the United States -- a framework law and regulation mostly are centralized and out of reach for local people to change, which isn't to praise local centralization, local centralization being unfavorable too -- would mean that what is in institutions would leave them, making the interaction a replacement.
My concern is that law and regulation are what you'd use to construct what you want in institutions.
Getting back to the word institution, sure, it's a harmless word, a word in fact I'd argue that is personable and private, wherein an individual creates his business and calls it a clinic, a practice, a hospital, an institute, a whatever.
When I read your use of institution, what it consisted of and excluded, what popped into my mind was, Oh, gees, his desire (I recall) is without discussion on how to achieve it, and because of that, I inferred laws and regulation would lead the way, making X replace Y, making natural remedies replace present remedies.
That interaction is opposite of the free market, the free market being the individual interacting with an individual (voluntarily, therefore mutually), which in time after enough such interactions because enough individuals have learned, what is uncommon becomes common. If I understood your desire, that is, to institutionalize nature in health care in any environment other than in a free market, there's no choice but for prices of food to whatever else natural to:
1/3) enable monopolies on nature, stripping out the remaining vestiges of the prime quality in these remedies' market, freedom, making their prices today their lowest (and you and I being RPers know the market's freedom mostly is top-down global corporate managed trade);
2/3) therefore, induce manipulation including artificial inability to supply the demand; and,
3/3) therefore, increase prices.
So far, little to no license is needed to purchase foods or buy many novel healing devices. Rather, the environment they are in is free, meaning the individual chooses to buy what he wants and isn't connected -- by taxes or any other manner -- to a product's creation. All that's needed for someone to access a natural remedy is what's needed to acquire any other thing in a free market -- looking, searching and studying. It's up to the individual to teach himself to acquire what he wants.
School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of learning. -Me
You know, you make a good case against MD licensing :)
Because it requires an institution, and the institution can then be corrupted by special interests...HEY that sounds like the government. You know, it's times like these that I remember the Jeffersonian ideal of the average person being able to understand his government. Shouldn't we have that same ideal for health? When you take away all the lies and the advertizing and the politics and the bullshit, health isn't that difficult to understand, is it?
Interesting that you'd say my
Interesting that you'd say my argument opposes MD licensing. It does and I do oppose its present form. My reasoning for my stance on it takes a while to explain, but my argument for it is my argument for anything else: lay out the free market process, how it works. Thanks for your compliment, RainbowPie.
Right, health isn't too difficult to understand. Maintain good blood flow, avoid dentistry and vaccines, exercise, sweat, eat well, consume sweets in moderation, learn acupunture points and meridians, learn acupressure and massage techniques, own a cupping set and a some other tools, and you'll be set to have good health and a long, joyous, fruitful life.
When it comes to health, books are nice, but I take this advice, advice long before I came across it tucked away in an old book on health and medicine: Study Nature, Not Books. (But use books to supplement studying nature.)
School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of learning. -Me
Love it!
Good stuff!
"It does not take a majority to prevail but rather an irate, tireless minority keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men."
--Samuel Adams
Bumping it again!
Thank You!Excellent!
nice-
I wonder if we could send your newsletter to every health food store in the country.
I'm working on that, but its a great idea
To get a mailing list and blast-em; I'll do it.
Brilliant!
The decision to seek alternative medical care for my wife in 2010, and the individual mandate on health insurance not including alternative care, is what lead me to Ron Paul in 2011. She is now 95% back from where we were for about 8 years, with about 18 months of alternative care and medicine.
You all, I would be happy to send you my PaulCare newsletters
if you want to pass them out.
just email me at drkresearch@hotmail.com
Let me know if you need any campaign literature.
You can also go to the Web site I designed, www.healthfreedom2012.com
Another great idea from Dr. K
Thanks!
Loving this idea! But I
Loving this idea! But I suggest we shorten the list and focus on just the key main issues-seems like short and sweet works better for people who are too busy to take out much time to read a lot these days.
I should say they are all main issues, but if we focus on the key ones that the general public is concerned about, might work better.
OK; I published a simpler summary
Thanks
SantorumUncare
Our non-smoking, non-carousing, intelligent, little-to-no booze Dr. Paul versus the UnFamily Candidate:
Big Tobacco and More
ntorum’s second-highest total came from the Altria Group, including predecessor companies like the Philip Morris Companies and U.S. Tobacco. The makers of Marlboro cigarettes and Skoal tobacco have spent more than $96,000 in PAC funds to advance Santorum’s political career.
Santorum, a member of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, opposed increased restrictions on the tobacco industry — joining with 39 other Republicans and two tobacco-state-Democrats to kill the 1998 Universal Tobacco Settlement Act.
The bill aimed to “prevent the use of tobacco products by minors” and to “redress the adverse health effects of tobacco use.” It also would have incorporated a settlement requiring the industry to pay billions of dollars to state governments. After Congress failed to pass it, a narrower settlement was reached between the tobacco companies and state attorneys general.
In addition, documents made public as a result of the tobacco settlement with the states indicate that representatives from Philip Morris communicated with then-Rep. Santorum in 1994 during the debate on the Clinton health care reform proposals.
A March 20, 1994, interoffice memo notes that several company employees attending public meetings with Santorum reported “very positive” conversations aimed at ensuring his opposition to an increase in the federal excise tax on cigarettes.