7 votes

National Election Pool - Are the networks counting the votes?

A video analysis of this year's primary results, posted here in a discussion, exposes an arrangement worthy of aggressive investigation. Is this the fishy smell of recent elections all being very, very close?

The video asserts that the networks are relying on the same company for "exit polling", Edison Research, a company linked by an Iowa newspaper reporter to the National Election Pool, the latest iteration of the Voter News Service (formerly News Election Service), a consortium of the television networks and the Associated Press.

At 15:18, the finding of the Iowa reporter:

"In many years, the tabulation for the votes in Iowa was handled by the media" (emphasis mine)

Link to the video:

This Hoax Affects Everyone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OynCgwmD-HM

Here is a related article, available for many years online, and written before electronic voting:

A House Without Doors, by James Condit, Jr.
http://www.votefraud.org/chronicles_house_without_doors.htm

Are the networks united in a consortium controlling vote counts, linked to election fraud?




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I am so fricken pissed, Thank

I am so fricken pissed,
Thank you for the video

I've always thought 3rd party

I've always thought 3rd party candidates were under-reported. Before I stopped voting I would always vote 3rd party for everything and write in friends where there were only the mainstream parties. One year I checked the precinct results and saw that two of the people I voted for had 0 votes. They weren't write-ins, so they should have been counted. I stopped voting after that.

Add a little content

in your title and comment to help the search.

I don't necessarily agree with you that this video is "Proof of Election Fraud". But it is an interesting consortium to inquire about? What do they do? Has anyone vetted them? Investigated them?

ecliptic's picture

Here's how it went down

In the 1990's ...

An organization called "The League of Women's Voters" ran the United States presidential debates.

A new independent challenger Ross Perot had serious insider info regarding MIA's in Vietnam and how the trail of MIA's always lead to opium traffic and it's massive money-laundering.

http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Skull_Bones.htm

Rather than allow Ross Perot a "soapbox" to reveal what he knew about Vietnam MIA's . . .

The entire presidential debate infrastructure was re-made into the fraud that exists to today.

»»» http://riseforliberty.com/ «««

Skull and Bones...

How does this get us to verifiable voting and an honest election in 2012?

bumpity

.