16 votes

The truth about Nevada

The Nevada Republican Party (NRP) does not deserve your wrath.

As in many other states, good Ron Paul supporters got involved at all levels in the party. For us it was personal because we were determined to not let what happened in 2008 happen again here in Nevada. As you may recall, the 2008 convention was abruptly halted when then state party chairman Sue Lowden realized a majority of the delegates to the national convention were going to be Ron Paul people.

NRP Vice Chairman James Smack (now acting chairman), Secretary Jim DeGraffenreid along with Treasurer Michael Bertrand specifically ran for those offices to assure a fair and open caucus and convention. My husband, Kurt Criss, is the NRP Rules Chairman and helped James, Jim and Mike stand against those who wanted to bend the rules in many ways. One rule they fought relentlessly for was to count the votes in every precinct meeting in front of all attendees interested in watching and then post the final tallies on the NRP website so all could check the results of his/her own precinct.

Dramatic issues in the Nevada caucuses were the special Saturday evening meeting (which ended up being a Ron Paul coup)and 1-2 instances in Clark County (Las Vegas) where ballots were apparently taken by the precinct chairmen without being counted in front of the attendees (not enough votes to change the results). What much of the time was spent on in the post-caucus hours was checking and rechecking to determine that 57 precincts in Clark County had 1 or 2 vote descrepancies between in signed-in attendance and ballots cast. These could largely be attributed to precinct chairmen and secretaries forgetting to sign in or forgetting to get late arrivals to sign in before receiving a ballot. The number of votes that could have been manipulated would not have changed the results. Jim brought these issues to the 4 campaigns. They all agreed to count these votes so as to not disenfranchise people due to a mistake by a volunteer chairman or secretary.

Another complaint I really take issue with is that they took a long time to report the official results. Wouldn't you rather have a correct tally rather than a fast tally? Jim and his team stayed up into the wee hours of Sunday morning, slept only 2-3 hours and were back at it again throughout Sunday working to GET IT RIGHT. Remember Iowa? If there had not been such a rush there, those several precincts may have been counted and helped Ron Paul's total. Also, look at Maine. What is their rush? Why not get all caucuses' results?

Another misperception was the timing of the resignation of the state party chairman Amy Tarkanian at midnight after the caucus. This had been planned for over a month because her husband intends to run for a congressional seat here in Nevada.

We were beaten by the surge given to Romney from Florida moving ahead of Nevada on the calendar (part of the RNC's plans to help Romney), Romney's fiercely strong LDS-led organization in Nevada and I hate to say it but here it is: Ron Paul supporters not turning out or not being able to vote since they missed registering as Republicans by the January 20th deadline.

I can't speak for what happened in other Nevada counties, but in Elko County where our gold-mining-backed economy is one of the best in the nation the turn out was very low. Even though there was an order of magnitude more support for Ron Paul over 2008 we only had 6 additional Ron Paul votes!! Trying to get 2008 people to help GOTV was a lot like "the Little Red Hen" story. Everyone wanted to eat the bread of Ron Paul's message, but wouldn't even come cast a vote at the caucus for him.

Hope this helps clear up some bad feelings toward Nevada's state party. Hope everyone will take to heart to be registered, be there, and be a delegate!



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thanks

Thanks for the post PatHenry

I also think many who wanted

I also think many who wanted to vote could not vote because they came after the caucus started (thinking that they could come at any time, like in a primary) - and could not be admitted.

http://www.dailypaul.com/213154/ben-swann-breaks-down-the-de...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_Iji3xF0e4

UFOs are real
4 Hour Witness DVD (radar operators, pilots, scientists, military)
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud49Gh9yYLs
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpHAxxRKksQ

Thank you much

for your efforts and considerate posting.

I'll be the first to admit feeling disappointed in a loss, but at least there is peace of mind

Not sure why this was down

Not sure why this was down voted. Nice post. Bump.

You've only been a member for 6 weeks...

hmmm...me thinks you are a RINO in disguise trying to rationalize why we lost Nevada. I don't think so~~~

No Ron Pauler would say what YOU said:

"Hope this helps clear up some bad feelings toward Nevada's state party."

I've only been a member of Daily Paul for 6 weeks, but

I was elected a Nevada delegate to the 2008 Republican convention for Ron Paul, but the votes were not counted until almost 2 years later! I could write a long story of how we took over our county party and by doing so removed the state Vice Chair who was as corrupt as Sue Lowden, kept Ms. Lowden from the Republican Senate nomination in 2012, spent endless hours working with the folks I wrote about in the original post to make the party follow their own rules, and get good people into office both within the party and as elected officials. Oh, and I collected hundreds of signatures for the C4L End the Fed and Obamacare petitions and other petitions to get rid of Cap and Trade.

If it wasn't clear in my original post, the people, i. e. "Nevada's state party" that did the careful recounting are OUR people!

Could you put into your post regarding

how many votes approximately were lost due to disinfranchisement. This was a significant issue and some of this was caught on tape. Each vote is a precious thing, and perhaps some of those who were turned away had desired to be delegates.

In such tight races these issues do make a difference.

Why were the causes held at the least convenient time for workers and young people to show up, who had conflicts in the work environment, while favoring the elderly, who might be included to the non-Paul candidates?

It's all about "who shows up

It's all about "who shows up on time and ready to go".

Thank you for the post....

It is important to hear from folks on the ground.